1. Home
  2. Detail

@silvercopvisionario00: @Thiago Brava lembrancinha e olha lá 😂 #thiagobrava #thiagobravaclipfy #clipfyleague #esposatrofeu

silvercopvisionario00
silvercopvisionario00
Open In TikTok:
Region: BR
Wednesday 18 March 2026 01:07:23 GMT
1578
29
0
2

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.58MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (1.42MB) Watermark .mp4 (1.66MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @silvercopvisionario00, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Cách viết iPhone đúng chuẩn chính tả! #vulaci #learnontiktok
Cách viết iPhone đúng chuẩn chính tả! #vulaci #learnontiktok
plng waktu nya Daddy 🥰#Aktor China Liang siwei#
plng waktu nya Daddy 🥰#Aktor China Liang siwei#
كلهاذ الجمال و ب400 الف #explore #الشعب_الصيني_ماله_حل😂😂 #fyp #foryo
كلهاذ الجمال و ب400 الف #explore #الشعب_الصيني_ماله_حل😂😂 #fyp #foryo
Sáp thơm ô tô cao cấp đủ vị cuộc sống #sapthomoto
Sáp thơm ô tô cao cấp đủ vị cuộc sống #sapthomoto
Throughout history it has been said that female hormones are too variable, too noisy, and too complicated to study. In this conversation, Dr. Jennifer Garrison points to research that challenges that assumption directly. A researcher named Emily Jacobs ran the same kind of longitudinal study on a man that had previously been done on women — tracking brain activity and hormone fluctuations over the course of a month. The result: just as much dynamic fluctuation. In a male. The regions of the brain were different. The hormones were different. The time scale was different. But the amount of variability? The same. Which raises an obvious question: if the variability is equal, why has it only ever been framed as a female problem? As Dr. Garrison puts it, the idea that female bodies are too noisy or that cycles make data difficult to interpret — is just not supported by the science. Tune into the full conversation, out now on all major streaming platforms.
Throughout history it has been said that female hormones are too variable, too noisy, and too complicated to study. In this conversation, Dr. Jennifer Garrison points to research that challenges that assumption directly. A researcher named Emily Jacobs ran the same kind of longitudinal study on a man that had previously been done on women — tracking brain activity and hormone fluctuations over the course of a month. The result: just as much dynamic fluctuation. In a male. The regions of the brain were different. The hormones were different. The time scale was different. But the amount of variability? The same. Which raises an obvious question: if the variability is equal, why has it only ever been framed as a female problem? As Dr. Garrison puts it, the idea that female bodies are too noisy or that cycles make data difficult to interpret — is just not supported by the science. Tune into the full conversation, out now on all major streaming platforms.
#120fps || She so🔥❤️ #Typhoeus #ArknightsEndfield #EndfieldCreators #WindSnowDream #huylor #bakerysqd #hanasq
#120fps || She so🔥❤️ #Typhoeus #ArknightsEndfield #EndfieldCreators #WindSnowDream #huylor #bakerysqd #hanasq

About

Legal