Austin DiValentino
Region: US
Wednesday 18 March 2026 15:29:22 GMT
20118
1922
108
43
Music
Download
Comments
melo :
What is your ideology then? What convinces you to atheism over Christianity? Let’s have a battle of evidence
2026-03-18 17:49:24
3
TikTokTexn :
atheism can't be proven
2026-03-18 18:20:32
4
user796384645698 :
Atheism isn’t a fact claim like Christianity. Just a statement about a lack of belief in one specific thing
2026-03-22 19:56:33
6
Jerry_Corelli :
To have an open and honest good faith arrangement atheists would need to accept Atheism is a religion just as evolution is.
2026-05-01 22:37:44
0
(ܝܙ) ܦܐܒܠܥ :
Im atheist and i read both the bible and the quran
2026-03-31 01:45:48
4
🥰🥰🥰 :
thank you 💗
2026-03-18 20:11:36
10
Beka :
thank you 🙏😊
2026-03-28 18:19:37
0
Halal Chuy :
Atheism can’t be proven.
2026-03-19 18:27:31
4
K🦢 :
I don’t even have any negative experiences with the church I just don’t believe in god 😭
2026-03-18 18:30:38
49
J :
I do believe that something came from nothing though. Even if a God exists, then who or what created God? I believe in the Pythagorean view that the universe is made of numbers, math and logic structures that justify and define our “existence”. Our universe “exists” in the set of all true mathematical and logical statements, in the same set as the statement 2+2=4, which is true even a void of nothingness. We only exist theoretically, even if we perceive ourselves as real physical entities and our universe as a real physical space.
2026-03-18 15:49:24
9
kiyuuuu115 :
literally never hard anyone say these things and i study theology so am around religious people everyday.
2026-03-19 11:52:58
0
DK☦️ :
I know many atheists typically interact with defenses of a monotheistic conception of God, but in philosophy of religion, have there been real serious attempts at defending other conceptions of reality such as polytheism or other non-western/Abrahamic conceptions of the divine?
2026-03-18 15:36:41
2
Peking :
I'm an atheist and a moral realist and I believe the world came from nothing. and in fact I think this will be the dominant, conventional view in the near future. 👍
2026-03-18 22:24:37
4
az.projects :
If you're interested in the Quran, I recommend Fazlur Rahman's book, "Major Themes of the Quran."
2026-04-10 02:03:51
1
Kizer Douglas :
Spot on
2026-03-20 07:59:34
0
TraditionalToms :
Good take man but I choose to believe in god
2026-04-07 04:57:12
0
AiméePaxheart Author✒️ :
The Humanity Protocol is a book about an AI character. He tells the story of how humanity is reset and AI evolves Free now on Amazon
2026-03-19 11:21:48
0
Asif Islam :
@Zehn Ali
2026-03-20 07:15:48
0
atheism illogical :
As someone working in the Logos series, I’d like to offer a parallel: 4 things atheists probably shouldn’t say about non‑atheists.Unicorn fallacy Comparing God to a “mythological unicorn” is a categorical mistake. Unicorns are a specific imaginary creature within a natural category (animals); God, classically, is not that kind of entity at all. Saying “no unicorns exist, therefore no gods exist” trades on an equivocation and dodges the harder ontological questions theists are actually raising.Pastagod fallacy The flying spaghetti monster or “sky spaghetti” is a clever meme, but as an argument it usually becomes a straw man. It treats biblical or classical theism as if it were just another arbitrary cartoon deity thrown into the mix. That ignores the long philosophical development behind “God” as understood in Jewish‑Christian thought, and it doesn’t seriously engage claims about a necessary, grounding reality.Misreading “knowledge of good and evil” A frequent move is to reduce “knowledge of good and evil” to “just morals or meta‑ethics” and insist it has nothing to do with logic. In the Logos series, knowledge of good and evil (KGE) is taken as the basis for logic, which then grounds ontology, which then grounds morality. Treating KGE as only a narrow moral category misses its structural role in how we reason about reality in the first place.Reading vs. studying (and semantic archaeology) There is a difference between casually reading religious texts and actually studying them with intellectual honesty and semantic archaeology. I would challenge atheists who comment on the evolution of meme organism, or biblical usage of "Elohim " to engage the best work in historical, linguistic, and philosophical scholarship instead of dismissing it from a distance. That includes taking seriously ideas like the “evolution” of the Jesus style meme God organism and how such an organism, like meme could be tracking, rather than merely mimicking, a deeper reality.My hope is not to shut conversation down, but to invite better ones—where both atheists and non‑atheists stop using easy straw men and start dealing with each other’s strongest, most precise claims.
2026-03-20 01:11:22
1
To see more videos from user @reasonandreligion, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
