@theeconomist: Does Tucker Carlson consider himself a Zionist? The Economist’s editor-in-chief, Zanny Minton Beddoes, interviews MAGA’s most prominent dissident. Click the link to watch the full interview. #Iran #Israel #Trump #Netanyahu #US #MAGA #TuckerCarlson

S :

I’m confused. Why do I like Tucker lately ….

idontwantatiktoc1 :

She did frame that question with some intention, and he saw it

Jabs - ciclista antirracista :

Guys remember you are not agreeing with Tucker, he is agreeing with you

looollll :

“you don’t want to define your question and i don’t know why” - was beautiful.

hh :

A master class in critical thinking.

PR en Dallas🇵🇷 :

Is this the same Tucker I use to not like?

Laurie Ann :

She is not even listening to him.

willyonwrd :

They really just showing how biased they are like they don’t even hide it😭

rmaidurmi21 :

Tucker is truly a brilliant journalist

Ardi Koka :

yellowone777 :

She isn’t defining what she means or is unable to. He has right to ask her to clarify

Rellforever :

Tucker has a right to ask clarifying questions.

JM :

As a lifelong democrat, this man has earned my respect. Keep speaking your mind, Tucker.

HoodStoryteller :

He actually responded to her VERY WELL

Mdnght :

She forgot that Tucker Carlson is smart.. I don’t agree with him on most of his political opinions but he has held strong in his believes and he is very direct here and I appreciate that

sthexxer :

Tucker , that was a great response 👏

lou bulka :

This whole interaction has me like this

misteri hidupmu :

Tucker you are the best

heysugarhey 🇨🇦🏳️‍🌈 :

Why does she keep interrupting him

SaM2407 :

I am also confused why economist posted this 😅

Hector zeronie :

“What are we doing, what’s going on”

Sarabell1015 :

Damn Tucker!!!!! I actually like this guy now

HRHHoney :

Tucker we love you !!!

F :

“You dont want to define your question and i dont know why”

Tribal Touch Design :

The question is an accusation! An accusatory question is a statement of blame disguised as an inquiry, often used to assign guilt rather than gain information.