@lliinnhhllyy:

Muốn làm học sinh lớp10
Muốn làm học sinh lớp10
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Saturday 21 March 2026 13:26:07 GMT
50313
6174
28
646

Music

Download

Comments

mvanessa.vroom
TDat :
Trời ơi dễ thương quá chịu ko nổi
2026-03-21 14:11:18
0
ducduongchat
duc duongg :
ơ kính đâu r người đẹp :3
2026-03-22 01:18:01
1
nn_mh_dc
『𝐓𝐨𝐫𝐢』 :
~do u want some pizza~
2026-03-21 15:18:02
0
minhquy521
Hoàng Minh Quý ☑️ :
biết xinh rồi khỏi
2026-03-26 00:24:10
0
animeforyoup
•‿• :
In4 áo ạ: BNR-TCQ-TLB
2026-03-21 14:21:57
4
ngotrhqjy1y
Trọng đời thường 🫟 :
Ee
2026-03-25 06:16:38
0
kyy.duyn_2
kyyduyenn. :
tut tóc
2026-03-22 16:16:59
0
rgvghgfdee
Nam :
đầu tiên
2026-03-21 13:27:55
0
pan_24.02
24th2 :
K rep ai luôn
2026-03-22 19:14:22
0
vua.vim
Vua Viêm Đế :
chiij toi nay giận r:)))
2026-03-21 14:53:21
0
thucquyenni01
QuyênxQin :
sao thấy lạ lạ ta
2026-03-21 14:34:17
0
do_hgiabaocuti
HoàngGiaBảo :
bxa giận hả
2026-03-21 15:47:08
0
khang1322007
Bảo.Khang :
Chị bảo mất kênh rồi mà
2026-03-21 13:48:44
0
mip1246
Mip🎀🐶 :
🥰Đầm cổ xinh ạ🌷 AST-LEK-QMJ
2026-03-23 07:39:40
1
quangnguyen03111
Người tình mùa đông☃ :
I love youu
2026-03-24 03:27:14
0
gahasi07
Mimi :
Dạ váy ạ🎀 CHV-KJK-EWG
2026-03-22 00:16:57
3
nguynhongphong29
px :
ai bảo xinh quá cơ
2026-05-14 04:32:57
0
tranmanhhoang2016
tranmanhhoang2016 :
xinhh yht🥰🥰🥰
2026-03-21 13:30:51
0
nnghia99.9
NNghia :
😂⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ 😂⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ 🤣⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀😂 ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀  ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ 😂⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀🤣 ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ 😂⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ😂⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ 😂⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ😂⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ🤣⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀😂 ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎😂⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎😂 ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀😂 ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ 🤣⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ 😂︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀😂 ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀😂 ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ᅠᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀🤣ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ😂⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀😂 ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀😂 ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀😂 ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀😂ᅠ⠀︎ ︎🤣⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀😂 ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ 😂⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀😂 ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀🤣 ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ 😂⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ᅠ⠀😂 ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎😂⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎🤣⠀ ⠀ᅠ😂⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀🤣 ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ😂⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀😂 ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ😂⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀😂ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ 😂⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ😂⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ 😂⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀😂 ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ 😂⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀😂ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀🤣 ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ🤣⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ 😂⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀🤣 ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀😂ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ 😂⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎ ︎ ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ᅠ⠀ᅠ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀ 😂⠀ ⠀ ⠀︎⠀ ⠀ᅠ⠀︎ ︎⠀ ⠀😂🤣 😂 🤣ᅠ︎⠀ ⠀ 😂⠀🤣ᅠ︎⠀ ⠀ 😂⠀ ⠀ ⠀
2026-03-21 13:27:55
0
minh_chou02
𝖒𝖈. :
Link váy bả vớiiii
2026-03-21 15:29:05
0
hoitinloaibobietbay02
Trai đẹp kẻ ăn trộm hòn dái hx :
Sao sốp đã có khung bts r 🤓
2026-03-22 03:51:19
0
uynn5208
uyen :
Xin link ốp vs nàng oiii
2026-03-21 14:40:55
0
To see more videos from user @lliinnhhllyy, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Graham's number is a very large number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form abc⋅⋅⋅, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g64,[2] wheregn={3↑↑↑↑3,if n=1 and3↑gn−13,if n≥2. Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. Fanart only. This is just an anime edit of Yuri, not real and does not support or promote any violence, extremism, nuclear weapons, or real-world harm. #yuri #dokidoki #animeedit
Graham's number is a very large number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form abc⋅⋅⋅, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g64,[2] wheregn={3↑↑↑↑3,if n=1 and3↑gn−13,if n≥2. Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. Fanart only. This is just an anime edit of Yuri, not real and does not support or promote any violence, extremism, nuclear weapons, or real-world harm. #yuri #dokidoki #animeedit

About