@newscientist: Is it possible to *build* a fourth dimension? 🧊 We only ever experience three spatial dimensions, but quantum lab experiments suggest a whole new side to reality – weird particle apparitions included. Tap the link in bio to find out more #fourthdimension #physics

Harry S. Colon :

Ettore Marangi :

It’s still a three dimensional object

AiPriest :

You guys just getting to the 4th dimension? Good grief 😂

royc233 :

so is time travel possible yet

reklus :

real question doesn't time negate the other space dimensions?

maravelous77 :

‘Synthetic’ would be the key word in “synthetic fourth dimension”. Still neat tho, just not a dimension operating beyond 3d space

_🇳🇬🇯🇲 :

So yall are just going to drop this video just like that ?? Say more. Now. 😅

BirthrightCtzn :

So the 4th dimension is a view into every possible interaction past, present, and future? That's an easy way to sort of understand it for me.

Bheki Ginindza :

why do we use space as more real than time. this is the limitation that locks our reality to 3 dimensions. time has dimensions too near the speed of light in space.

Leftist :

jpbebbington :

Higher dimensions hurt my brain. I am not good enough at maths to follow any if the more advanced stuff.

Mister Pak-3astoni - Phantom :

Interesting 💙🖤🫶✨️

jeager-lonewolf :

MOST OF THESE POSTS IN PARAGRAPH FORM WERE MADE FROM CHAT GBT

Phongleq :

Isn’t the fourth dimension just a movie?

OU812 :

I think it's a mistake to think such things have any connection to any objective reality. It a useful conceptualisation. Just an IT we have always programmed multidimensional arrays with many more than 3. In the 80s when I was first learning this it took a leap of mind to break from trying to visualise these arrays & move past my mind trying to relate them to physical directions. Once I realised there isn't such a connection it became easy. Most, if not all, of physics & maths is the same, that's is, it's extremely useful & highly accurate but not 100% accurate as it's simply a model that for the same inputs produces highly accurate predictions but internally the model likely has no connection to any objective reality at all.

Alain Jean-Baptiste :

Digitalmooney :

Nice! Thank you for sharing 👍🏼

Brant :

Chaz :

Excellent!

andrew sampson :

What a brilliantly simple idea. Assume that computationally it’s… large.

Eric Butler :

Yeah……I’m not as smart as I thought I was….

MD sohel :

ভ৷

Mr.3ig3oss :

โครงสร้างนี้มันขยายได้เรื่อยๆ ไม่มีจุดเริ่มต้นตายตัว ถ้ารู้ลำดับเส้นทางมันมีโครงสร้างสมบูรณ์แค่รูปแบบเดียวเท่านั้นผมกำลังรอลุ้นอยู่ว่าจะมีโอกาสได้เห็นไหมในช่วงชีวิตนี้ 😬

Digital News 24 Horas :

Interessante 👏