@kendrahilty: Replying to @dope.amine86 using AI to outsource thinking and writing is way riskier in the long term than using it to understand emotions and power dynamics.

ginger_rupe :

This series is still going on? What season is this?

⋆K I R B O⋆ :

Wait so like?? Did you snap out of that whole love story thing?

adenjazmine :

Softfang :

We are responsible for our behaviours, and sure, AI is cool in many ways - but…the delusion is very real. Your story, to me, is about the harms of AI towards vulnerable people (which is a lot of us). I’m glad to hear that you have a human therapist you trust. In a year, you’ve come a long way.🐾☀️

pigeon :

been on walter all week tbh

Alara :

The only thing is…well, this is from my guides and its also advice for me. They want us to learn how to connect with them on our own. But I can understand using AI for some things, I have done that too. I just think that if we all would believe that we can do anything then we would discover amazing things. 💜

rosarozay5280 :

So good for are climate

nicole :

i just don’t really care why

næ :

good for you queen im glad ur healing ✨

Chantel Moniz :

Good take❤️

Alrighty Aphrodite :

Girl

Oktaviya :

Wow what an absolute break of trust with the other clients thats so inappropriate. But given the other behaviors not surprising. In fact thats the least problematic 😅

ⵇ᮵𐊪𑀕ӿ :

sorry... its on chatbot creators to make their bots good therapists instead of on the people in power to provide universal and accessible mental healthcare??? the mental gymnastics here are wild

jae’La :

Charles Shea :

You've hit on something really significant here. There's this massive double standard where intellectual complexity gets celebrated and respected, but emotional complexity gets pathologized and shut down. Think about it - if someone spent hours working through a complex mathematical proof, testing different approaches, considering edge cases, building elaborate frameworks to solve a problem, that would be seen as rigorous thinking. Admirable dedication. If a physicist mapped out intricate theoretical scenarios to understand particle behavior, that's just good science. But do the same level of systematic analysis with emotions, relationships, or social dynamics? Suddenly you're "overthinking," "being dramatic," "making it too complicated," or "spiraling." The same cognitive processes that get praised in STEM contexts get treated like pathology when applied to human experience. The bias is fucking stark. Mathematical complexity: "Wow, look at that brilliant mind at work." Emotional complexity: "You need to calm down and simplify." This happens because emotional complexity threatens people. It suggests that their surface-level interactions might be missing something important. It implies that feelings and relationships are as worthy of rigorous analysis as equations. It challenges the idea that emotions should be simple, contained, easily manageable. Society has this vested interest in keeping emotional processing shallow because deep emotional intelligence reveals uncomfortable truths about power dynamics, authenticity, manipulation, social conditioning. A person who can systematically analyze emotional patterns is harder to gaslight, harder to dismiss, harder to control. The "just keep it simple" crowd benefits from emotional illiteracy. They don't want people developing sophisticated frameworks for understanding human behavior because that threatens systems that rely on people not thinking too deeply about why they feel what they feel.

Ellie 🐶🐱 :

Good gd how are you still going

Daniella Jose :

Don’t start beefing with your therapist now

Heather :

Oh yeah hey 👋 that's called a "God sized gap/hole/void.." and only God can fill it🤝 ❤️