Jessica Burbank
Region: US
Friday 27 March 2026 16:52:19 GMT
10996
1533
52
56
Music
Download
Comments
Lauren Taylor :
the insurance company’s rationale is broken here. if they’re removing risk from the balance sheet remaining policy holders premium should go down not up. All corporate greed.
2026-03-27 20:55:44
35
Luke M :
Why don’t they update the building code in fire prone areas to include fire prevention and mitigation systems? Genuinely curious.
2026-03-27 17:20:34
4
pastorbethtime :
and now Fannie Mae is going to accept crypto backed mortgages. can't see any issues there
2026-03-27 17:14:36
51
closerproximity :
There is more to this: coastal areas as example were never paying an appropriate amount for insurance because lobbyists were busy keeping rates low. If the rates were relative to the actual risk, there would have been less development in high risk areas
2026-03-27 23:16:36
1
gigikov :
Yup our insurance company dropped us in FL mortgage went up by $600/mo because of forced bank insurance
2026-03-27 17:19:00
5
Zac Bringhurst :
Utah just passed a law that protects companies from litigation for damage to the environment. HB222.
2026-03-27 18:01:40
2
Tubz :
So we want to fund the protections against the downstream effects of climate change with the companies that will have to inevitably be put out of business in order for the effects of climate change to be truly mitigated. What a brilliant idea.
2026-03-28 07:30:22
0
-𝔇ℭ- :
I sell homeowners insurance (agent). it's nearly impossible to sell to CA & OBX and almost all my callers are from CA at this point. its rough.
2026-03-27 18:30:12
6
Craiggers :
Move your money to a credit union
2026-04-25 05:06:09
0
Meat Popsicle :
Florida is real bad
2026-04-20 23:18:57
0
Kairyn Potts :
Your hair looks particularly nice in this video ❤️
2026-03-31 07:30:18
1
William :
? ATMs are a loss leader? Why would I care where my atms are, I want you to bank with me. Insurance different question/issue
2026-03-28 06:37:52
0
Domina :
Signed 🥰
2026-03-28 05:11:33
0
ted finkleman :
Hair looks great! 🤩
2026-03-27 17:35:06
0
Whiskerstache :
we should definitely just keep building the homes the same way in the same spots as before and not make any adjustments due to fire/flood/etc. a brilliant strategy to be sure
2026-03-27 18:35:36
8
The_RZH :
If homes are uninsurable due to climate risk, less expensive homes must be built. That way reconstruction costs are affordable after floods, fires, or whatever destroys them.
2026-03-27 21:11:50
3
Adam Eriksen386 :
Holy hair Batman.
2026-03-27 19:04:43
1
Atown Hommie :
You’re so hot!❤️
2026-03-28 04:21:20
1
Mia the Jester :
It’s like war crashes world markets
2026-03-27 20:02:39
0
mrhere2m :
Meanwhile the Trump Administration is defunding subsidies for renewable energy because he “doesn’t like them.” In other words, the Saudis and American oil companies pay him to eliminate renewable energy programs.
2026-03-29 14:45:28
1
Justin :
Also, oil companies knew about climate change decades ago and actively lied about it.
2026-03-27 18:44:43
1
name :
I'm voting for lo lo for insurance commissioner. let's abolish private insurance all together!
2026-03-27 17:32:18
1
ayeyomosho :
i signed and left a comment. tax the rich or the hungry will eat.
2026-03-27 18:50:11
1
Frank :
denying reality works really well up until the insurance adjustors get involved. adjustors have ALL the numbers, like every number ever, they got 'em all.
2026-03-27 17:28:01
1
Kyle :
you're an intelligent woman. you have studied history and some economics. the problem isn't the climate (there is data to support this) the problem is that many areas susceptible to disasters are no more populated (so no disasters go rip through completely unpopulated areas) and the value of losses are higher because construction and existing structure costs are higher. expected value of losses =p*v*u where p= probability of getting hit (📈) v = value of units (📈) and u=units (📈). both in economics where the principal is to always pick the solutions that solve the underlying problem or as close to the problem as you can get, and historically policies like this have not solved anything and often cause worse problems or unintended consequences. v needs to decrease. and the Federal reserve doesn't want to focus on that since they're the problem with value and cost of replacement increasing.
2026-03-28 21:40:22
1
To see more videos from user @kaburbank, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
