@doutordicassaudaveis: Siga o doutor para mais conteúdos!

Dr. Dicas Saudáveis
Dr. Dicas Saudáveis
Open In TikTok:
Region: BR
Saturday 28 March 2026 15:44:22 GMT
4001
186
12
22

Music

Download

Comments

ednarodrigues9407
ednarodrigues9407 :
só não gosto da gema 😏
2026-03-29 10:26:42
0
robson.carvalho293
Robson Carvalho :
gosto muito
2026-03-29 07:30:20
0
fernandooliveira016
𝔽𝕖𝕣𝕟𝕒𝕟𝕕𝕠 𝕆𝕝𝕚𝕧𝕖𝕚? :
top de verdade 👏👏
2026-03-29 13:10:15
0
mariameres160
ne segue para ganhar 1 milhão :
euzinha gosto muito
2026-03-28 21:23:19
0
escorpio.negro61
escorpião negro ☯️♏ :
🥚 ovos
2026-06-25 11:57:01
0
solnas.25
Sol🌞 :
ovo
2026-05-06 00:23:25
0
maria.zilda309
Maria Zilda :
ovo
2026-03-29 12:36:49
0
marta_francisco3
Marta_FranciscO :
ovo
2026-03-29 11:32:05
0
lucianocastrobapt
Raimundo Florêncio :
ovo
2026-03-29 03:44:00
0
cristinatandela86
CRISTINATANDELA 💝 :
ovos
2026-07-15 22:36:25
0
antoniasousa33
D'Maria :
👏👏👏
2026-03-28 20:14:54
1
To see more videos from user @doutordicassaudaveis, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

anti communist action Graham’s number is one of the largest numbers ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It was defined by mathematician Ronald Graham in the 1970s while working on a problem in Ramsey theory. Why does it exist? Ramsey theory asks questions like: “How big does a structure have to be before a certain pattern must appear, no matter how you try to avoid it?” Graham was looking at a specific problem involving hypercubes (higher-dimensional cubes) and coloring their edges with two colors (say, red and blue). He wanted the smallest dimension n such that any 2-coloring of the edges of an n-dimensional hypercube is guaranteed to contain a monochromatic planar square (four corners all connected by the same color). The exact number that solves this problem is unknown, but Graham proved that it must be smaller than a certain ridiculously huge number — now called Graham’s number (often denoted G). He also showed it has to be at least 11 (later improved slightly by others). So G is an upper bound, not the exact answer. How big is it, really? Extremely big. To give you perspective: •  The observable universe has roughly 10^80 atoms. •  A googol is 10^100. •  A googolplex is 10^(10^100). •  Even numbers like TREE(3) or the Busy Beaver function grow faster, but Graham’s number was (for a while) the record-holder for “largest number used in a proof.” You literally cannot write Graham’s number down in ordinary decimal notation — there aren’t enough particles in the universe to store all its digits. In fact, you can’t even write the number of digits of Graham’s number using ordinary notation.  #anticommunist #communism #edit #politics #thirdposition
anti communist action Graham’s number is one of the largest numbers ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It was defined by mathematician Ronald Graham in the 1970s while working on a problem in Ramsey theory. Why does it exist? Ramsey theory asks questions like: “How big does a structure have to be before a certain pattern must appear, no matter how you try to avoid it?” Graham was looking at a specific problem involving hypercubes (higher-dimensional cubes) and coloring their edges with two colors (say, red and blue). He wanted the smallest dimension n such that any 2-coloring of the edges of an n-dimensional hypercube is guaranteed to contain a monochromatic planar square (four corners all connected by the same color). The exact number that solves this problem is unknown, but Graham proved that it must be smaller than a certain ridiculously huge number — now called Graham’s number (often denoted G). He also showed it has to be at least 11 (later improved slightly by others). So G is an upper bound, not the exact answer. How big is it, really? Extremely big. To give you perspective: • The observable universe has roughly 10^80 atoms. • A googol is 10^100. • A googolplex is 10^(10^100). • Even numbers like TREE(3) or the Busy Beaver function grow faster, but Graham’s number was (for a while) the record-holder for “largest number used in a proof.” You literally cannot write Graham’s number down in ordinary decimal notation — there aren’t enough particles in the universe to store all its digits. In fact, you can’t even write the number of digits of Graham’s number using ordinary notation. #anticommunist #communism #edit #politics #thirdposition

About