@user.ahmyahya: #الشيخ_محمد_بن_علي_الشنقيطي #الأوقات #الشياطين #رسول_الله_صلى_الله_عليه_وسلم #سبحان_الله_وبحمده_سبحان_الله_العظيم

𝓐𝓱𝓶𝓮𝓭 𝓐𝓛𝓨𝓐𝓗𝓨𝓐
𝓐𝓱𝓶𝓮𝓭 𝓐𝓛𝓨𝓐𝓗𝓨𝓐
Open In TikTok:
Region: SA
Saturday 28 March 2026 18:31:20 GMT
1413869
89315
1902
34526

Music

Download

Comments

aliakeel32
Ali Aqeel :
اللهم اني عبدُك ابن عبدِك ابن امتِك ناصيتي بِيدِك ماضيٍ في حكمك عدلٌ في قضائُك اسألك بكل اسماً هو لك سميت به نفسك او علمته احد من خلقك او انزلته في كتابك او إستأترت به في علم الغيب عندك ان تجعل القرأن العظيم ربيع قلبي ونور صدري وجلاء حزني وذهاب همي
2026-03-29 04:56:51
81
yasmin.alsharkawi
yasmin alsharkawi :
الثلاث اوقات الاولى عند غروب الشمس في المغرب والثانية العتمة وهي بعد صلاة العشاء وحتى الثلث الاخير من الليل او حتى الفجر او الصبح ولم تقل الثالثة يا شيخ في احد يعرف الثالثة رجاءآ ولكم جزيل الشكر. آللهم اعز الاسلام والمسلمين آمين
2026-03-30 10:30:12
83
1.nikabi.ifaa
نقابي عفة :
كلما جاني اشعار اعرف انك صليت على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم
2026-03-31 05:59:21
90
messaoudkh706
messaoudkh706 :
اللهه يا مقلب القلوب ثبت قلوبنا على دينك
2026-03-29 06:17:09
51
ahmat.youssoubo
Ahmat Youssoubo :
2026-03-29 12:30:21
7
youssouf.moussa432
youssouf moussa :
اللهم إنك عفو تحب العفو فاعف عني وعن كل مسلم 🥰🥰🥰
2026-03-30 05:04:48
18
rafat16.0
رافت :
اخي كلام.من ذهب لكن صوت الموسيقى مع قراءة القران جزاك الله خير
2026-03-30 18:20:05
10
quran_ksa9
(قرآن يُتلى) QURAN :
2026-03-30 18:30:40
9
nasri.carol
Nasri Carol :
لا اله إلا انت سبحانك اني كنت من الظالمين اللهم صلي وسلم على سيدنا وحبيبنا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين وسلم تسليما كثيرا إلى يوم الدين
2026-03-30 19:50:51
9
wahibabenlaardj
biba :
استغفر الله العظيم و اتوب اليه استغفر الله الدي لا اله الا هو الحي القيوم
2026-03-29 19:32:35
13
fakhama015
فاتي :
سبحان الله وبحمده سبحان الله العظيم
2026-04-02 20:58:58
7
abdouliesonko2
أبو صالح :
اللهم إني أسألك حسن الخاتمة
2026-03-30 18:16:21
5
sarwgan
شروق :
اللهم صلي وسلم على نبينا محمد عليه الصلاة والسلام
2026-03-30 18:54:38
10
abd.alwahed78
العفيفة الطاهرة :
سبحان الله وبحمده سبحان الله العظيم ❤️❤️❤️
2026-04-01 13:34:29
7
dya4qq2vf8td
mohamed galal :
عليه افضل الصلاة والسلام
2026-04-01 09:26:34
8
user437308030116
عنتر عنتر :
صلي الله عليه وسلم
2026-04-03 16:27:00
6
bouramadiallo271
إبراهيم 271☪️✨️ :
اللهم صل 💖 وسلم وبارك على نبينا 💔 محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم 💔 💔
2026-04-03 15:13:29
6
qxipm
منال :
سبحان الله وبحمده سبحان الله العظيم
2026-03-31 08:31:11
8
alrhudalrhud
الرشيد عبد العزيز🍃 :
:لا أعرف من المحظوظ الذي سيقرأ تعليقي لكن أسأل الله العظيم أن يجبر بخاطرك جبراً عظيماً يتعجب منه أهل السموات والأرض ويرزقك من حيث لاتحتسب وأن يشفي مريضك ويرحم ميتاك ويرد غايبك يارب العالمين اللهم صل وسلم وبارك على سيدنا ونبينا وحبيبنا وشفيعنا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين عدد ماذكره الذاكرون وغفل عن ذكره الغافلون وعدد الحركات والسكون وعدد ما يكون اللهم يامغير الاحوال غير حالنا الي احسن حال وسخر لنا من حظوظ الدنياء ماتعلم انهو خير لنا واصرف عنا كل ماهو شر لنا انك على كل شيء قدير سبحان الله وبحمده سبحان الله العظيم لا اله الا الله وحده لا شريك له له الملك وله الحمد وهو على كل شي قدير اللهم لك الحمد كما ينبغي لجلال وجهك وعظيم سلطانك سيؤتينا الله من فضله انا إلي ربنا راغبون واستغفر الله العظيم واتوب اليه عدد خلقه ورضا نفسه وزنة عرشه ومداد كلماته🤲🏻🤍🤲🏻
2026-04-01 15:37:52
7
itzyusrv
yusra :
رب اجعلني مقيم الصلاة ومن ذريتي ربنا وتقبل دعاء
2026-03-30 02:15:26
6
user2816986708081
ابوعمار شنكالي :
اللهم ثبتنا على دينك
2026-03-29 12:19:53
27
aromaticelegant
برونزية :
صارت هذي الاوقات للبشر من اجمل الاوقات الله يحفظنا
2026-04-01 06:13:26
9
khalid___zakri
♓khaLid🇮🇹 :
اللهم إنك عفو كريم تحب العفو فاعف عنا
2026-03-29 11:08:09
8
nanna6524
Hanin 💖💖🇹🇳🇹🇳 :
الحمدلله اللهم اجعلنا من ااهل القران والعبادة والمستغفرين بالاسحار وذكر الرسول والصلاه والسلام على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم
2026-03-31 05:30:00
8
ismail.niger2
على ابن عيسى الراشدى :
سبحان الله وبحمده سبحان الله العظيم استغفر الله واتوب إليه
2026-03-28 22:24:37
9
To see more videos from user @user.ahmyahya, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form  a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is  g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if  n = 1  and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if  n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid #napoleonbonaparte🦅 #ishowspeed #napoleon #fyp #meme
Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid #napoleonbonaparte🦅 #ishowspeed #napoleon #fyp #meme

About