Battmann :
I see clearly your point, though it sounds a lot like the classic lament of old-school developers who never bothered to adapt and are still desperately clinging to the past.
For years, many in this industry got way too comfortable cultivating that 'tech-hipster' persona—commanding CEO-level salaries while operating with a level of bohemian aloofness that frankly rarely translated into actual efficiency. They lived in a bubble where they needed armies of QA testers to catch bugs for months, endless detailed reports, and constant hand-holding from project managers just to remind them of basic timelines and requirements.
And even with all that infrastructure supporting them, the final products—with very few exceptions—were often just bloated, spaghetti-code messes. They were riddled with patches, technical debt, and bugs, and they frequently missed the mark on the team's initial vision entirely.
When I started using AI, I didn't jump straight into the deep end. I began by asking for ways to solve specific problems; it gave me code snippets with detailed explanations, and I realized the potential immediately. I didn't stop there. I kept pushing, and today, I don't just write code—I supervise the process. I have Claude handling the branches, forks, and pushes directly to Git, complete with immaculate documentation for every change.
The results speak for themselves. The UIs are cleaner and more intuitive because the 'designer'—the AI—doesn't have an ego; it respects every single one of my requirements to the letter. I get iterations delivered in seconds, not weeks. At the end of the day, the tools I build now hit 100% of the project requirements because I am the planner, the project manager, and the client. The bottleneck is gone.
2026-06-11 03:46:46