@addison____3:

addison.traviss
addison.traviss
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Tuesday 07 April 2026 18:43:11 GMT
21782
492
6
9

Music

Download

Comments

haleejo3
Haleejo :
Girl I love your swimming suit where is it from?
2026-04-07 21:49:31
2
chaney_traviss
chaney_travis :
Now this is what the fans wanna see
2026-04-07 19:02:34
5
mollcanter
mollie canter👑👑 :
@chaney_travis your laugh in the back. right…
2026-04-08 15:14:13
1
To see more videos from user @addison____3, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Australian Greens Senator David Shoebridge criticizing the AUKUS security pact, a trilateral defense agreement between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. ​In the clip, Shoebridge argues against the massive financial commitment required by the pact—specifically Australia's plans to acquire nuclear-powered submarines. Here is a breakdown of his key arguments and the context behind them: ​Key Arguments in the Video ​Political Consensus as
Australian Greens Senator David Shoebridge criticizing the AUKUS security pact, a trilateral defense agreement between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. ​In the clip, Shoebridge argues against the massive financial commitment required by the pact—specifically Australia's plans to acquire nuclear-powered submarines. Here is a breakdown of his key arguments and the context behind them: ​Key Arguments in the Video ​Political Consensus as "Ritual Humiliation": Shoebridge targets major political parties (mentioning Labor and One Nation), accusing them of participating in what he calls a "ritual humiliation of Australia" by selling out the country's national interests. ​Bankrolling Foreign Defense Industries: He asserts that spending hundreds of billions of dollars under the guise of AUKUS does not serve Australia's strategic needs. Instead, he argues the funds are effectively "bankrolling" the domestic weapons and defense industries of the United States and the United Kingdom. ​Prioritizing Domestic Spending: He concludes by stating that this massive expenditure comes at a time when the money should be spent directly at home for the immediate security and benefit of Australians. ​Context of the AUKUS Debate ​The Greens have been vocal critics of the AUKUS agreement since its conception. While proponents of the deal argue that nuclear-powered submarines are essential for maintaining a strategic balance and deterrence in the Indo-Pacific region, critics like Shoebridge highlight several major concerns: ​The Price Tag: Estimated to cost Australia between $268 billion and $368 billion over three decades, making it the most expensive military project in the nation's history. ​Sovereign Capability: Critics express concern that relying on US and UK technology and maintenance frameworks ties Australia's foreign policy too tightly to Washington and London, potentially reducing its independent decision-making in regional conflicts. ​Opportunity Cost: Many argue that these funds would be better directed toward pressing domestic issues, such as housing, healthcare, climate transition, or alternative regional diplomacy and conventional defense capabilities.

About