@jakevsthestate: No faults so far. Immaculate

Pookums :

it ended the chase didnt it?

jackofallfacts :

safer =safer for police

f1mv7 ³ :

Aren’t pit manuvers also extremely unsafe in the first place? Why blame the police instead of the driver who decided to start a police chase? It feels like you guys just find any reason to paint the police in a bad image.

OwnedbyCow :

“It failed one time! See how bad it is!”

KevMoMoney :

Even safer!!

Doogle Crochets :

These are so cost effective, the installation doesn't cost much and there is no on going prison costs

tattooed.dad1585🇨🇦 :

nothing is 100 percent guaranteed. pit maneuvers fail too.

Cabdono :

nothing of value was lost anyway

Bort :

Police probably won’t even pay for the property damages

..samule :

They been using these for ten years, less accidents happen using these then the pit manoeuvre

Lukas :

To be fair, that was entirely on the cop’s poor driving.

Just-Ïçë :

this design is very human 🙏🏽🫩

Noc Mellow :

this has to be satire right?

Lauren :

You forgot it safely glided across 4 lanes

Dazzz :

well atlases he's safe right?

Batmeringue 🇳🇿 :

Sixty percent of the time it works every time!

Eddie :

safer for the cops at least

USSR :

bdon cowan :

And also save the court time 🤦🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️obviously a win win , right ?😳😅

Jeebus :

the car stopped didnt it.

217 filmz 🇨🇦 :

that was 100 percent operated error

dstef :

I know he’s being sarcastic, but I choose to take what he says literally. I agree. 100% safer.

kendallbrowne5 :

it stopped the chase, the cops safety in the job was safe, local council could have had better walls

Lukeness :

Lmad_kpn :

It wasnt done properly