“Technically legal” means 2 groups of lawyers are going to spend 8 years and make yacht money battling it out in court.
2026-04-11 14:20:04
968
galazon.xyz :
Anthropic don't want to poke too much at the legalities of ai creating code based on other code.
.
2026-04-11 15:39:02
321
Aleq de Villiers :
That’s extremely funny but also very troubling for several reasons. It’s really weird that ripping the source code directly to a design doc like that works, I don’t think a human can legally rip a design doc like that in the first place. But I might be wrong.
2026-04-11 16:05:49
17
user183938737294 :
Where to find source code / remade code?
2026-04-11 18:31:22
5
The 3DPrintifer :
They also wrote it in Python and then rewrote it in Rust based on that Python 😂
2026-04-12 07:20:35
6
hahsh68g :
Eh so i assume this will be challenged. Pretty sure that if you summarise a book then write that book from the summary you are 100% going to run into issues (even if its 2 people doing it)
2026-04-11 14:28:50
2
ugvudtdugiduhufygvuf :
this is the plot of "halt and catch fire" season 1 👍
2026-04-11 14:54:18
3
thats_a_bot :
Oracle v Google must be so pissed rn
2026-04-12 17:47:01
2
Heavy Mod :
I thought you couldn’t copywrite AI content
2026-06-05 13:38:24
1
Christ is King :
most of Claude Code was vibecoded anyways is anyone surprised by this in the slightest? hat on a hat type situation.
2026-04-12 02:34:57
2
Vulon-Zahkrii :
"you are technically correct the best kind of correct"
2026-04-11 15:23:34
2
rick304918139090 :
companies been doing this for years
2026-04-12 17:44:22
1
The Prince Charles :
WHO HAS THE GITHUB REPO😭😭😭😭
2026-04-12 06:44:05
4
Absolute Dingus :
This is also how PC clones became a thing. If Compaq didn’t do a clean room reverse engineer of the PC in the early 80s we would not be where we are today
2026-04-11 18:50:08
9
Dennis Shelgren :
I love that the acronym "clean room as a service" is CRASS, works both logically and ethically.
2026-04-11 19:08:37
10
lukehebb :
claude code was vibe coded according to anthropic. i thought ai output can’t be copyrighted?
2026-04-19 19:48:29
1
boofus :
I hate AI jfc
2026-04-11 23:25:27
1
Matthias Wichert :
Just like how Compaq was able to re-engineer IBM's BIOS, kicking off the computer architecture we still use today.
2026-04-14 20:32:52
1
Heero Yuy356 :
your technologically correct, the best type of correct
2026-04-12 04:07:44
1
Chad Herbert :
Are we getting into the AI version of Intellectual Property Ship of Theseus debate now? 😂 I’d call what’s happening Meta-code. Meta-code is the code for writing the code. Oh, but isn’t that Instructions? What is code, if not Instructions? 😂 One could say that Meta-code is just encoded instructions and the second AI is the Key. IP in one form is still the same information before and after it’s been encoded… The encoding method might be IP though, I suppose… 🤔 Wouldn’t it be ironic if they could break the code patents and patent their method for copying code? 🤭
2026-04-17 09:36:35
1
Krobravodor :
Yeah
2026-04-25 15:25:07
0
michael.tiktok :
Where is it?
2026-05-29 13:01:04
0
Ruben_Kelevra :
Same technically legal level as printing source code in a book to export it 🥲
2026-05-21 21:38:49
0
Wiktor Zieliński270 :
it is only if source code isn't in training data. But it probably is
2026-05-04 10:45:35
0
WingDingKing :
that law is literally in place so copyright laws can't be used to kill competition
2026-04-11 17:13:00
0
To see more videos from user @alberta.nyc, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.