@sandymason19834: LAWYER If Cops Say I'm Calling For a K 9 Say These Words!#fyp #law #lawyer #cops #viral

Sadist :

geee. thanks. 3 videos and no answer

gvexcavationllc :

if they didnt have probable cause for the stop, they can not create probable cause after. They still need a warrant for a search and seizure.

Scott H :

3 videos and still says nothing

jatx1823nt2 :

So I didn’t learn anything. I guess I’ll block you

Matt G :

Dude that was annoying!!

Dammit :

there are no words move on, no like

Inward Jim :

I DO NOT CONSENT TO ANY SEARCHES, EVER.

:

I didn’t see the other video so I don’t know if he’s talking about Rodriguez versus the United States but that’s the case where they tell you that you cannot bring dog out to extend the traffic stop unless you have clear probable cause

Chris Zandarski :

I’ant did nuffen

derekmkv :

Narcotics don’t need to be present for a K-9 to alert!

AmyAnn :

To any officer who thinks they can drag out a traffic stop just because they don't like what someone says, or to go fishing for something else:The Supreme Court has been crystal clear since Rodriguez v. United States (575 U.S. 348, 2015): A routine traffic stop is a limited seizure under the Fourth Amendment. Its duration is tied strictly to the "mission" of addressing the reason for the stop, verifying license/registration/insurance, checking for warrants, and writing a citation or giving a warning. Once those tasks are done, the authority to detain someone ends. You cannot prolong the stop, even by a few minutes, to: • Wait for a drug dog to arrive for a sniff. • Ask unrelated questions hoping to generate new suspicion. • "Fish" for other violations. • Punish someone by making them wait because they exercised their rights (like remaining silent, refusing consent to search, or saying something you find disrespectful). Adding any measurable time to the stop for off-mission investigations requires independent reasonable suspicion of a crime, not just a hunch, attitude, or "something feels off." The prolonged detention is an unconstitutional seizure, and any evidence obtained can be suppressed. You also cannot force them out of the car and then use that as an excuse to extend the stop or start a new fishing expedition just because they said something you didn't like. .This isn't opinion, it's settled federal law. Ignoring it risks civil rights violations, suppressed evidence, lawsuits under §1983, and department liability. Do your job, handle the violation efficiently and let them go. Anything more without real reasonable suspicion is illegal. Know the law. Respect the Constitution.

michaelscott3704 :

you can never trust the police

Mike Rabig :

Now I’m going to unfollow you. Do better.

Barry :

Get to the point geez. And no I’m not going to your other videos!

user40333853308 :

You forget about cops who don’t care about the law they will just lie and say you where nervous same way they will search you for saying they “smell” alcohol on your breath

~ 🌼 ~ Sheila ~ 🌼 ~ :

‘Officer are you detaining me or am I free to go’

mextex :

GEEZE..I felt that you was detaining me...waiting for the answers..less words ..you not in court ..🤔🤔

charlie :

Fake alerts

dan :

that's because the handler makes the dog alert so they can search your car

✌️ :

If you do any violence towards a police K-9 you are charged with a crime as if they are actual police. Therefore if a police dog scratches up your car you should be able to file a claim against them. A cop could not just walk around your car scratching it

donsterp66 :

I’ve seen videos where a cop gets a dog to jump on the car and they’ll say the dog alerted to something. I’ve seen police dog trainings, military & civilian where when a dog alerts, they sit. Not jump on the car.

gvexcavationllc :

Kenny Henning :

You don’t have to be the pink panther to figure out they are clearly signaling to the dog and really if it’s wrong that consistently I don’t see how they are still aloud to use them

HOSS ❌️ :

complete waste of time