@luanguyen.ld: Mối quan hệ giữa VÀNG-USD-DẦU MỎ #luaochina

Lụa ở China
Lụa ở China
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Monday 13 April 2026 13:09:58 GMT
179081
5631
110
311

Music

Download

Comments

halinhh0301
Hà linh :
K nói ai cx bjk. Toàn câu thừa
2026-04-13 22:49:24
2
dydzkql0aptw
K H :
😂em nói có lý hay 👍
2026-06-04 03:35:43
0
thanh.nguyen0226
Thanh Nguyen :
em kiến thức em quá giỏi anh rất bội phục em em nhớ rất tiệc vời quá
2026-06-06 21:33:47
0
bet5339
bet :
Bạn giỏi lắm, vấn đề cao sâu, phức tạp vậy mà bạn nói rất dễ hiểu, người chưa học hết phổ thông như mình cũng vỡ ra một chút. Cảm ơn bạn nhiều . Nếu dịp nào bạn về VN, mình muốn mời bạn ăn phở, uống cà phê !
2026-04-17 05:57:29
4
hoaihuong031069
hoaihuong1969 :
Trang của bạn này phân tích nhiều khía cạnh cuộc sống, riêng mình thấy hay !
2026-04-16 02:31:46
9
user9fxxhu8bq4
Khương Đức Thưởng :
em nói tiếng việt giỏi thế em ơi, anh thấy cái gì em cũng biết hết nhỉ,anh cung đa mua nước giặt của em rồi đấy?….
2026-05-30 16:38:45
0
ph.zen.11
Phú Zen Eleven :
Cảm ơn Bạn!💯❤️🥰
2026-05-19 04:42:33
0
tieucarot15032018
Quan Thiên Mệnh :
Thứ vàng đen này lợi hại lém á. Bạn này ptich một phần trong đó thui mà đã thấy nhiều thứ liên quan nhau. Cảm ơn bạn đã chia sẽ để mọi ng hiểu,nhiều khi tui hiểu mà ko thể nói một cách dễ hiểu như bạn chia sẽ cho mọi người. 😂
2026-04-21 10:09:45
1
userweahxisfpt
trantho :
bốc phét lấy tương tác 🤣
2026-04-14 05:07:21
0
ledung881977
Phố Vẫy TRẦN DUY HƯNG :
Tôi biết bạn biết… nhưng nghe bạn chia sẻ cũng hay
2026-04-13 13:23:54
8
peace.qtv
Boss Door Composite ✅ :
Nước giặt đừng tăng nhé kk
2026-04-13 15:08:38
1
32022357409
Lương Tiến Minh :
Hay
2026-05-04 01:21:56
0
phong.vi76
phong vi Thanh :
sao e biết hay vậy
2026-05-04 03:37:02
1
pham.nguyet779
Pham Nguyet :
Cháu nói chuyện rất hay và chuẩn cháu rất là thông minh ! Bà cảm ơn cháu ❤️❤️❤️🥰🥰🥰
2026-04-15 23:09:48
2
thnh.l.ngc76
Thành Lê Ngọc :
em này giỏi đấy , rất hiểu biết
2026-04-13 13:54:25
5
h.li109
Hờ Li :
cho hỏi tại sao cái gì cũng tăng lương không tăng
2026-04-13 13:34:40
0
diep24081988
Điệp :
Em này có chịu đầu tư tìm hiểu về kiến thức khá tốt
2026-04-15 02:39:39
1
tho_the
vo hien783 :
thông báo răng giá nước giặt hay quá
2026-04-13 13:50:54
1
pham.vu347
Rice_Smoothie :
Tình là máu, xưa máu rơi vì nhau... Tiền là giấy, ta mất nhau vì đây !
2026-04-21 08:02:58
0
dinhluoc1977
dinhluoc1977 :
b noi dung ban dc 9diem hi hi....
2026-04-21 07:52:51
0
duydung1979
Dũng Dấm Dớ :
rất hay
2026-06-01 15:22:08
0
thanh.l1846
Thanh Lê :
mình cảm ơn bạn
2026-07-25 14:46:36
0
nguyetnek35
hoanghiep817 :
cái gì chị cũng hiểu cảm ơn chị đã cho em biết về ý nghĩa cuộc đời
2026-05-15 09:12:58
0
anh.ba340
Anh Ba :
vẫn theo dõi bạn cũng được đấy
2026-04-13 14:10:20
0
To see more videos from user @luanguyen.ld, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

#ball #spiral #funny #balls Graham’s Number: A Deep Dive Graham’s number is one of the largest numbers ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It was introduced by mathematician Ronald Graham in the 1970s while studying a problem in an area of mathematics called Ramsey theory, which investigates how order inevitably appears within large enough structures. Although Graham’s number is unimaginably huge, it is finite, well-defined, and far smaller than many numbers explored in modern logic and set theory. The problem involved coloring the edges of a high-dimensional cube. Graham needed an upper bound on the dimension where a certain pattern must always appear. His original proof produced Graham’s number as a safe upper limit. Later research dramatically reduced that bound, but Graham’s number remains famous because of its extraordinary size and elegant construction. To understand why it is so large, begin with ordinary growth. Addition grows steadily, multiplication grows faster, exponentiation grows even faster, and repeated exponentiation creates power towers. For example, 3^{3^3} is already much larger than 3^3. Mathematicians generalize this process using Knuth’s up-arrow notation, invented by Donald Knuth. One arrow represents exponentiation, two arrows represent repeated exponentiation (tetration), three arrows repeat tetration, and each extra arrow creates a vastly more powerful operation. Graham’s number is built recursively. First define a number g_1 using 3 with an enormous number of up-arrows between two 3s: 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 This alone is already so immense that writing its decimal expansion is impossible. Next, define g_2 as 3 separated by g_1 up-arrows and another 3. Since g_1 itself is unimaginably large, the number of arrows explodes beyond comprehension. Continue this process so that each new value determines the number of arrows in the next. After repeating this construction until g_{64}, the final value is Graham’s number. Its decimal representation cannot fit inside the observable universe. Even if every particle stored billions of digits, there would still be nowhere near enough space to write the number completely. The number of digits alone is vastly beyond anything physically representable. Despite its enormous size, Graham’s number has interesting properties. It has a definite last digit, which is 7, and mathematicians can compute several of its ending digits using modular arithmetic. This demonstrates an important principle: numbers can be too large to write yet still possess computable characteristics. Many people mistakenly believe Graham’s number is the largest possible number. Mathematics has no largest finite number, because adding one always produces a larger value. Even expressions such as TREE(3), SCG(13), or values arising from the On Numbers and Games framework dwarf Graham’s number by an incomprehensible margin. These numbers emerge from different branches of mathematics involving combinatorics, graph theory, or logic. The importance of Graham’s number is therefore historical and educational rather than practical. It illustrates how abstract mathematical reasoning can naturally produce quantities far beyond physical intuition. Rather than being a curiosity invented for shock value, it represents a genuine milestone in combinatorics, showcasing the extraordinary scale that rigorous mathematics can reach while remaining perfectly precise and logically defined. #polyesteredit
#ball #spiral #funny #balls Graham’s Number: A Deep Dive Graham’s number is one of the largest numbers ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It was introduced by mathematician Ronald Graham in the 1970s while studying a problem in an area of mathematics called Ramsey theory, which investigates how order inevitably appears within large enough structures. Although Graham’s number is unimaginably huge, it is finite, well-defined, and far smaller than many numbers explored in modern logic and set theory. The problem involved coloring the edges of a high-dimensional cube. Graham needed an upper bound on the dimension where a certain pattern must always appear. His original proof produced Graham’s number as a safe upper limit. Later research dramatically reduced that bound, but Graham’s number remains famous because of its extraordinary size and elegant construction. To understand why it is so large, begin with ordinary growth. Addition grows steadily, multiplication grows faster, exponentiation grows even faster, and repeated exponentiation creates power towers. For example, 3^{3^3} is already much larger than 3^3. Mathematicians generalize this process using Knuth’s up-arrow notation, invented by Donald Knuth. One arrow represents exponentiation, two arrows represent repeated exponentiation (tetration), three arrows repeat tetration, and each extra arrow creates a vastly more powerful operation. Graham’s number is built recursively. First define a number g_1 using 3 with an enormous number of up-arrows between two 3s: 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 This alone is already so immense that writing its decimal expansion is impossible. Next, define g_2 as 3 separated by g_1 up-arrows and another 3. Since g_1 itself is unimaginably large, the number of arrows explodes beyond comprehension. Continue this process so that each new value determines the number of arrows in the next. After repeating this construction until g_{64}, the final value is Graham’s number. Its decimal representation cannot fit inside the observable universe. Even if every particle stored billions of digits, there would still be nowhere near enough space to write the number completely. The number of digits alone is vastly beyond anything physically representable. Despite its enormous size, Graham’s number has interesting properties. It has a definite last digit, which is 7, and mathematicians can compute several of its ending digits using modular arithmetic. This demonstrates an important principle: numbers can be too large to write yet still possess computable characteristics. Many people mistakenly believe Graham’s number is the largest possible number. Mathematics has no largest finite number, because adding one always produces a larger value. Even expressions such as TREE(3), SCG(13), or values arising from the On Numbers and Games framework dwarf Graham’s number by an incomprehensible margin. These numbers emerge from different branches of mathematics involving combinatorics, graph theory, or logic. The importance of Graham’s number is therefore historical and educational rather than practical. It illustrates how abstract mathematical reasoning can naturally produce quantities far beyond physical intuition. Rather than being a curiosity invented for shock value, it represents a genuine milestone in combinatorics, showcasing the extraordinary scale that rigorous mathematics can reach while remaining perfectly precise and logically defined. #polyesteredit

About