@iambelogai: кто помнит текст? го в комменты ⬇️ #дубцова #гагарина #комузачем #караоке

ИЛЬЯ БЕЛОГАЙ | BELOGAI

Open In TikTok:

Region: PL

Monday 13 April 2026 15:33:43 GMT

494756

12658

128

1103

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (3.63MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (5.67MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Дарья :

нарананананана

2026-04-14 13:44:35

1115

Компас Джека :

Почему с таким же успехом в моем мозгу не хранятся более важные вещи? 😂

2026-04-14 20:05:34

1055

Леся Здеся :

Когда уже что то сложное будет

2026-04-14 05:22:03

341

Faya b'yet tatu :

Какой уровень тяжело . Это БАЗА ЭТО ОСНОВА всего караоке 😅

2026-04-14 19:57:33

253

Мари :

Я пропела всееееееее😁😂

2026-04-14 17:46:46

157

тгк: Ангел :

я зумер, но я наизусть ее знаю не знаю, может дело в том, что мои родители бумеры(?) 😁

2026-04-14 01:48:16

127

Julianna :

подождите, я ещё не допела.. ))

2026-04-14 16:53:13

88

milrom13 :

Пьяная я эту песню наизусть знала….

2026-04-14 22:16:50

53

Снежана Вшивцева :

Я буду за руку тебя держать 💞

2026-04-18 23:01:50

12

🤍Єрош🤍 :

Это не тяжело… вот Фадеева «Танцы на стёклах»…не каждый вспомнит, уверена!)

2026-04-24 07:50:59

9

Віка 🇺🇦❤️‍🔥 :

Я только распелась, чего вы так рано закончили 😂😂

2026-04-22 19:01:08

37

dashakylikova :

блин, только набрала воздуха чтобы спеть припев и облом😁

2026-04-16 09:20:38

15

Kubichka :

Не, нужен припев и второй куплет

2026-04-14 18:24:40

30

🌻s u n f l o w e r🌻 :

Я проорала на всю квартиру в 3 часа ночи 😂

2026-04-14 21:31:55

7

Anarushi :

На самом интересном оборвал

2026-04-14 15:37:38

13

Mary :

На самом интересном месте, блин

2026-04-14 12:23:40

38

🫡Душнила🫡 :

Ни одного слова не вспомнила 🤣

2026-04-20 06:42:58

71

kroxa :

этот текст на столько у меня в голове,что я подумала,что там есть бэк-вокал ахахах

2026-04-24 20:32:38

5

aurelia :

Эй, я хочу дальше петь!😡🤣

2026-04-14 00:05:23

15

Fifynya :

не все слова пропала....но почувствовала ....спасибонахерВыпопались

2026-04-14 21:06:35

9

Daria_Iana :

в смысле сложно?

2026-04-14 14:16:11

5

ТГК: Марго.Больше,чем таролог :

наизусть🥺

2026-04-14 03:10:49

6

Танюшка :

Ира Дубцова 🥺🥺🥺🥺

2026-04-27 02:27:42

4

М🤌 :

эээй, я не допела

2026-05-05 13:02:19

3

Алиса Климова 🇺🇦 :

Я буду за руку тебя держать 🥰

2026-04-24 20:29:20

3

To see more videos from user @iambelogai, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Stay inspired by the path you are on. Dr. Aristotle #inspire

Stay inspired by the path you are on. Dr. Aristotle #inspire

Teri Meri Kahaani #foryou #vampire_queen1 #my_cat #indiansong #fypシ

Teri Meri Kahaani #foryou #vampire_queen1 #my_cat #indiansong #fypシ

HELLNAH, something simple#owm #onewheatmark #mikewheeler #byler #fpyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy @TikTok

HELLNAH, something simple#owm #onewheatmark #mikewheeler #byler #fpyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy @TikTok

A man in South Korea took his dog to the vet. What happened next almost sent him to prison. In 2017 he brought his dog to a clinic for treatment. He believed the animal was put through excessive testing, steered toward a surgery it didn't need, and left at risk of losing its sight. He wanted to do what any person does after a bad experience with a business. Write down what happened, name the clinic and the vet, and post it where other pet owners could read it and decide for themselves. But in South Korea, doing that could send you to prison for up to two years. Even if every single word is true. The law is Article 307, Paragraph 1 of the Korean Criminal Act. It's called defamation by stating facts. Paragraph 1 punishes anyone who publicly damages another person's reputation by alleging facts: up to two years in prison or a fine of five million won. Paragraph 2 covers false facts with a heavier maximum of five years. Truth lowers the ceiling on the penalty. It does not erase the crime. There is one exit. Article 310 spares a true statement only when it was made purely in the public interest. But the speaker has to convince a prosecutor and then a court that their motive was public rather than personal. That's a judgment about an interior state nobody can fully see, applied after the fact, by someone who was not there. The man challenged the law in front of the Constitutional Court. In February 2021, he lost by a single vote. All he wanted was to give other pet owners enough information to make their own choice about where to take an animal they loved. The law's answer was that the choice was not his to hand them. So the question becomes: whose reputations are being shielded, and what exactly are they being shielded from?

A man in South Korea took his dog to the vet. What happened next almost sent him to prison. In 2017 he brought his dog to a clinic for treatment. He believed the animal was put through excessive testing, steered toward a surgery it didn't need, and left at risk of losing its sight. He wanted to do what any person does after a bad experience with a business. Write down what happened, name the clinic and the vet, and post it where other pet owners could read it and decide for themselves. But in South Korea, doing that could send you to prison for up to two years. Even if every single word is true. The law is Article 307, Paragraph 1 of the Korean Criminal Act. It's called defamation by stating facts. Paragraph 1 punishes anyone who publicly damages another person's reputation by alleging facts: up to two years in prison or a fine of five million won. Paragraph 2 covers false facts with a heavier maximum of five years. Truth lowers the ceiling on the penalty. It does not erase the crime. There is one exit. Article 310 spares a true statement only when it was made purely in the public interest. But the speaker has to convince a prosecutor and then a court that their motive was public rather than personal. That's a judgment about an interior state nobody can fully see, applied after the fact, by someone who was not there. The man challenged the law in front of the Constitutional Court. In February 2021, he lost by a single vote. All he wanted was to give other pet owners enough information to make their own choice about where to take an animal they loved. The law's answer was that the choice was not his to hand them. So the question becomes: whose reputations are being shielded, and what exactly are they being shielded from?

aimons nous vivants #motivation #conseil #developpementpersonnel #pourtoiii

aimons nous vivants #motivation #conseil #developpementpersonnel #pourtoiii

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy