@miixiggai.115: #xh #cte #dangiu

𝓝𝓰 𝓜𝔂 💋
𝓝𝓰 𝓜𝔂 💋
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Tuesday 14 April 2026 05:25:53 GMT
4979
291
80
216

Music

Download

Comments

vnhat_24102010
sùng a lú(vnhat) :
hay nha ní
2026-04-14 05:31:15
2
wh.uan
nguyenhuy. :
còn làm ở đó kh e
2026-04-14 05:46:32
0
dovantrieu2212
Đỗ Văn Triệu :
Dặ
2026-04-19 03:22:56
1
2303giaminh
gia bin :
thương với chạ yeu
2026-04-14 05:48:54
1
peiuu_plk
𝐁𝐚𝐨𝐨 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧 :
thơ qá
2026-04-14 11:33:41
1
bunskhung
bún :
hoa mà cũng biet đăng ảnh à
2026-04-14 10:28:33
1
tunglamdz27810
Tùng Lâm :
tốt b😁
2026-04-14 11:42:58
0
user2255005511
. :
mi iuuuu 💓💓💓
2026-04-14 06:50:37
0
nqb141110
NQB :
okkk
2026-04-16 04:09:43
1
_tr4.mj
tra my :
huu duyên bl
2026-04-14 05:34:16
0
n_thien_2405
𝕟𝕥𝕙𝕚𝕖𝕟😉 :
đgaii quá nèeee
2026-04-14 16:17:02
0
_quynhtram.021
Quỳnh Trâm :
iu dấuu
2026-04-14 05:55:00
1
meoiuoil
mi :
capybara
2026-04-14 05:28:37
2
meo21.3
Mèo :
trúng tiếng ⚡️ái tình
2026-04-14 05:27:49
0
vinhtin03012010
𝕍𝕚̃𝕟𝕙 𝕋𝕚́𝕟 :
bôi
2026-04-14 05:30:05
1
lnghan_nina
𝓖𝓲𝓪 𝓗𝓪𝓷 :
tưởng mi iu han
2026-04-14 11:22:11
0
na.iu.oi77
na iu oi ♡ :
ủa quán cf của t mà
2026-04-14 05:34:47
0
uyeii.nhie_
uyên nhi :
con capybara này đẹp nè
2026-04-14 05:28:36
0
_quynhtram.021
Quỳnh Trâm :
xao xuyến
2026-04-14 05:54:48
1
_quynhtram.021
Quỳnh Trâm :
rung động
2026-04-14 05:54:44
1
lehieu7557
Hiếu :
woowowowowoowoe
2026-04-14 06:37:27
1
huy_070121
Hoàng Huy :
đỉnh quá nội
2026-04-14 14:58:56
1
chuotdeptraitopgialai
🐭 :
dịu á
2026-04-14 06:52:12
1
vinhtin03012010
𝕍𝕚̃𝕟𝕙 𝕋𝕚́𝕟 :
em không chơi,em không đùa, em hay cọc
2026-04-14 05:38:08
0
nxs_08_
0,1% :
Tới nữa r
2026-04-14 05:28:08
1
To see more videos from user @miixiggai.115, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

“Is it enough to say, ‘That wasn’t real Christianity’?” Madalyn Murray O’Hair, one of America’s most outspoken atheist activists, repeatedly challenged Christianity—not simply by questioning the existence of God, but by challenging the authority and influence of religion itself. Her criticism focused on a difficult historical question: If terrible things have been done in the name of a religion, how should those actions be understood in relation to the religion’s teachings? O’Hair pointed to religious persecution, warfare, dogmatism, inequality, and conflicts within Christian history as reasons to question whether the darker chapters could simply be separated from Christianity altogether. She also challenged the idea that Jesus should automatically be accepted as a moral authority. In public appearances, she made deliberately provocative arguments about Jesus, the Bible, morality, and the influence of Christianity. Her criticisms were often sweeping and confrontational, reflecting her broader opposition to organized religion. (PBS) But there is an important distinction. Christianity has encompassed vastly different traditions, interpretations, institutions, and movements across roughly two thousand years. Historians therefore debate how directly particular wars, persecutions, political actions, or social practices should be attributed to Christian doctrine itself. That makes O’Hair’s argument less about simply listing Christianity’s darkest moments—and more about asking how we judge a belief system. Should a religion be judged primarily by: 1️⃣ Its teachings? 2️⃣ What its followers have done in its name? 3️⃣ Or both? And if a believer says, “That wasn’t true Christianity,” what should determine whether that distinction is historically justified? O’Hair’s conclusions were fiercely controversial. But the question she raised remains worth examining: Do we judge ideas by their principles, their consequences, or the people who act in their name? What do you think? 👇🏾 #MadalynMurrayOHair #Christianity #Atheism #Religion #ReligiousHistory
“Is it enough to say, ‘That wasn’t real Christianity’?” Madalyn Murray O’Hair, one of America’s most outspoken atheist activists, repeatedly challenged Christianity—not simply by questioning the existence of God, but by challenging the authority and influence of religion itself. Her criticism focused on a difficult historical question: If terrible things have been done in the name of a religion, how should those actions be understood in relation to the religion’s teachings? O’Hair pointed to religious persecution, warfare, dogmatism, inequality, and conflicts within Christian history as reasons to question whether the darker chapters could simply be separated from Christianity altogether. She also challenged the idea that Jesus should automatically be accepted as a moral authority. In public appearances, she made deliberately provocative arguments about Jesus, the Bible, morality, and the influence of Christianity. Her criticisms were often sweeping and confrontational, reflecting her broader opposition to organized religion. (PBS) But there is an important distinction. Christianity has encompassed vastly different traditions, interpretations, institutions, and movements across roughly two thousand years. Historians therefore debate how directly particular wars, persecutions, political actions, or social practices should be attributed to Christian doctrine itself. That makes O’Hair’s argument less about simply listing Christianity’s darkest moments—and more about asking how we judge a belief system. Should a religion be judged primarily by: 1️⃣ Its teachings? 2️⃣ What its followers have done in its name? 3️⃣ Or both? And if a believer says, “That wasn’t true Christianity,” what should determine whether that distinction is historically justified? O’Hair’s conclusions were fiercely controversial. But the question she raised remains worth examining: Do we judge ideas by their principles, their consequences, or the people who act in their name? What do you think? 👇🏾 #MadalynMurrayOHair #Christianity #Atheism #Religion #ReligiousHistory

About