elenanisonoff
Region: US
Wednesday 15 April 2026 01:47:26 GMT
36364
4495
153
256
Music
Download
Comments
andretti 🇳🇬 :
this is the free market capitalist brag about
2026-04-15 01:56:57
557
Jennifer💙 :
I’m in advertising. X is ineffective from a performance perspective besides being toxic politically. How can they prove it’s politically motivated?
2026-04-15 03:22:43
204
nano_sledge :
Not a chance that survives the inevitable lawsuit
2026-04-15 03:22:52
121
pizza pizza :
FTC is losing that lawsuit lol
2026-04-15 04:13:11
52
Trate :
According to the Supreme Court Cooperations have a right to use unlimited money supporting political speech. Therefore withholding money supporting political views is also free speech. They need to pick a lane.
2026-04-16 01:32:43
50
Zugzwehng :
so violate the first amendment rights of these companies?
2026-04-15 03:57:38
25
BubblePinkElle :
"free" market btw
2026-04-16 00:09:21
5
NikolaiSikes :
Naw that's BS. If my company pays for ad space, even through an agency, I can decide where I do or DONT want my ads to be placed.
2026-04-15 02:11:47
41
𝔹𝕆ℕℕ𝕀𝔼 :
so it's also illegal to refuse to air Lincoln project ads during Fox News then?
2026-04-15 03:28:34
53
Loredor :
I have a feeling this is going to get challenged
2026-04-15 02:08:30
38
JonM9979 :
This should last for 2.5 years
2026-04-15 04:06:58
11
JohnnyDoughBoy :
All right! Time to stop ANYONE from advertising on Twitter.
2026-04-15 08:36:11
5
Doug Garrison :
Weird how “freedom of contract” evaporates under certain circumstances
2026-04-15 12:31:30
7
roses_ofgold | Cosplay | YT&IG :
What do you mean they HAVE to spend their money on X ads. So X is just entitled to EVERYONE’s money?
2026-04-16 13:06:16
7
ju456783 :
So Orwellian.
2026-04-15 03:15:34
8
Bm :
But the real question is do these companies even want to stop their spending on those platforms or are they just doing it because they feel like they need to? Now they can say to the public we have to continue advertising here. It takes the moral obligation out of their hands
2026-04-15 03:33:41
5
Thumoeides :
That is forced silence based on content which is a 1st Amendment violation
2026-04-15 02:09:05
11
𝖓𝖚𝖑𝖑.𝖎𝖔 :
So a company that protects their brands was told they couldn’t protect their brand? On point for this timeline. Also, how many times do you get accused of being AI every day?
2026-04-15 05:26:46
6
Steve :
Okay, here's the thing - as we all know, corporations are people too, and can spend freely on political campaigns via PACs, as that's protected "free speech." Boycotts are well established protected speech. Which one of these is no longer true?
2026-04-15 11:07:22
5
Dan Walker :
If a brand tells their agency "If you promote us on Twitter, you're f*cking fired.", that's just the free market, baby!
2026-05-17 02:42:37
1
Bon Trose :
"Per the FTC I'm not allowed to tell you all of the negatives of advertising on X. I am allowed to tell you the positives... you'll need to give me a minute though."
2026-04-16 11:31:02
0
jimbobbybob2 :
Forcing companies to advertise on twitter? Yeah that doesn’t sound like free market capitalism to me
2026-04-21 05:38:52
2
thefauxpas42 :
Well the overturning of Chevron deference may actually do some good here
2026-04-17 08:03:14
3
David Slater :
I am pretty sure you are AI. I have watched hours of your videos. But still pretty sure
2026-04-15 02:34:00
3
AM1 🇨🇦 :
This is madness
2026-04-17 18:08:04
1
To see more videos from user @elenanisonoff, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
