@drevs.me: Как понять женщину за 30 секунд

drevs.me
drevs.me
Open In TikTok:
Region: NL
Wednesday 15 April 2026 11:01:19 GMT
3697441
194973
1038
100867

Music

Download

Comments

sarykishmish
Кішміш :
мило 😁😁😁
2026-04-24 23:16:44
437
anyamakarenko33
Анна :
Я сама себя не могу понять!Как это зделает другой человек?😂
2026-04-16 04:23:53
2675
user15081114090519
user15081114090519 :
Господи, как вы мне нравитесь. Как ЧЕЛОВЕК 👌🥰
2026-04-15 11:19:25
536
oksana471878
Оксана 🥰 :
он нас разгадал 😁
2026-04-17 15:24:12
82
perviz9929
perviz :
39раз смотрел не понял
2026-04-17 23:59:39
31
user6172569012856
. :
О да!Я кричу на мужа с любовью!Я потратила лучшие годы своей жизни на тебя зная как ты любишь меня!🥰
2026-04-17 22:04:27
13
marinabubowitsch
marinabubowitsch :
Вот это молодец, первый раз слышу, чтоб вот так. Молодец 👍 👍 👍, легко и просто объяснил и как будто бы, рассказал. 🙏🙏🙏👏👏👏Умный был доцент
2026-04-17 21:29:54
10
nelli.1960
Нелли1960 :
Все верно❤️❤️❤️❤️
2026-04-15 19:20:08
17
belorus14
BELO RUS 777 :
класс🥰
2026-04-16 04:39:43
6
oxnv.a
oxnv.a :
Спасибо за ваши контенты , спасибо огромное очень интересно смотреть!!
2026-04-24 23:51:11
6
ruslanakotova1968
Ruslana Kotova :
Интересно, но факт!🔥🔥🔥 Благодарю Вас!🙏❤️😻
2026-04-15 17:15:09
42
user5933693954269
user5933693954269 :
реально ,никогда не задумывалась, спасибо познавательно!
2026-04-21 05:43:36
10
ekaterinajavadova
Екатерина :
Очень мудрый и умный человек 👍👍👍
2026-04-17 17:13:30
12
bamburik13
БайДон :
Доктор Майлс Монро много хороших книг написал.
2026-04-15 22:53:30
32
_bloodycake
kian 🩸 :
я аналитична и это не значит, что я не излагаю факты наравне с рассказом о своих чувствах
2026-05-05 04:12:20
9
iryna_novokhatska
Ирина Новохатская :
очень здорово кайфую спасибо🥰
2026-04-15 11:53:34
88
feiczka
💞💗💞feiczka💞💃💞 :
Эмоции которые возникли сию секунду,ничего не значат😂😁😍
2026-04-15 19:12:19
134
psymuha
Псимуха :
не надо ее понимать в принципе. я не понимаю зачем вообще пытаться, дня чего?
2026-04-16 03:06:08
231
lizik_021
елизавета форкош :
я это уже лет так 10 назад сама поняла
2026-04-16 05:34:13
24
user14523430787914
ірина :
Скажите, кто он ? хочу его еще прослушать...сппсибо
2026-04-17 05:57:53
20
khrystyna.0110
Христя (Kristina) :
Я емоційна від того що він думає
2026-04-16 06:36:57
7
patriotka884
Patriotka :
Автор вы мне очень нравитесь, Вы хороший человек, у Вас добрая улыбка🥰
2026-04-17 04:44:12
5
vi.sb3
Vi.Sb :
Где найти оригинал?🥰
2026-04-18 01:39:04
6
www.immer.sport
Anatolii :
Я 11 Лет думал, как Вежливо сказать ето своей Же не!
2026-04-15 22:43:19
8
user7963599765445
Денис Монаков :
Гениально🥰🥰
2026-06-07 16:56:20
4
To see more videos from user @drevs.me, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

You've probably heard of Occam's Razor, which says that if there are two or more explanations for a fact, you should pick the simplest and the most obvious. For example, if you wake up tomorrow morning and find the ground is all wet, it's likely because it rained in the night and not because aliens landed and had a big water fight.  But Occam's Razor has an evil twin known as Occam's Broom, and it goes back to the late Daniel Dennett. Occam's Broom is when somebody sweeps away all of the facts because they are inconvenient, or do not satisfy the arguments they are trying to make.  For example, it might be a journalist who is trying to prove a point, and so only includes those facts and historical data points which support them. Or it might be when a pharmaceutical company promises a new drug and they run ten trials and in four the drug works perfectly. And those four are published, written up, and celebrated. But the six in which the drug did nothing are quietly filed away, and they are never spoken of again.  Occam's Broom is usually a kind of confirmation bias. It is when somebody wants to protect a belief, or to establish a certain narrative, and so they will cherry pick their facts, and they will leave out that which is inconvenient. But it is also more dangerous than an ordinary lie, because you cannot overturn that which you cannot see. If somebody leaves out the relevant data, you cannot hope to falsify it, or to challenge it.  Beware anybody who presents an argument that is faultless and without any critique whatsoever, the chances are they are leaving the things that they don't want you to see.
You've probably heard of Occam's Razor, which says that if there are two or more explanations for a fact, you should pick the simplest and the most obvious. For example, if you wake up tomorrow morning and find the ground is all wet, it's likely because it rained in the night and not because aliens landed and had a big water fight. But Occam's Razor has an evil twin known as Occam's Broom, and it goes back to the late Daniel Dennett. Occam's Broom is when somebody sweeps away all of the facts because they are inconvenient, or do not satisfy the arguments they are trying to make. For example, it might be a journalist who is trying to prove a point, and so only includes those facts and historical data points which support them. Or it might be when a pharmaceutical company promises a new drug and they run ten trials and in four the drug works perfectly. And those four are published, written up, and celebrated. But the six in which the drug did nothing are quietly filed away, and they are never spoken of again. Occam's Broom is usually a kind of confirmation bias. It is when somebody wants to protect a belief, or to establish a certain narrative, and so they will cherry pick their facts, and they will leave out that which is inconvenient. But it is also more dangerous than an ordinary lie, because you cannot overturn that which you cannot see. If somebody leaves out the relevant data, you cannot hope to falsify it, or to challenge it. Beware anybody who presents an argument that is faultless and without any critique whatsoever, the chances are they are leaving the things that they don't want you to see.

About