@kellycntq37:

Kels 🙈
Kels 🙈
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Wednesday 15 April 2026 21:15:29 GMT
20654
360
8
12

Music

Download

Comments

tufail_k05
tufail_k05 :
How Is This 🤭😝
2026-06-15 07:17:15
0
maliksajid5001
Malik Sajid—501 :
Rply 👍
2026-04-25 05:30:14
0
juantambriz33
juantambriz33 :
h🥰la 😍
2026-04-21 14:40:32
0
angielee120
Salvador :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-04-15 22:40:23
1
yurigfkm5at
alex :
😂😂😂
2026-04-15 21:41:06
1
seckoluis8
Seckoluis8 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-04-15 21:27:14
1
diegobenjamin35
Diego sarat :
😅😅😅
2026-05-16 02:05:10
0
monster9266
Евгений :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-06-29 20:11:32
0
To see more videos from user @kellycntq37, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

It is sickening to hear how many ppl will claim that Sam had a good childhood, smthing to be grateful for. Dean may have felt paternal towards him, but he was NOT his father. Dean may have sacrificed for Sam, but that implies he had much to give in the first place. Dean was not an adequate substitute. & as soon as Sam was ‘old enough’, he was left behind while Dean & John hunted. Everyone blames him for his hyper independence like he ever had a choice, ever had someone he could depend on. Certainly, he couldn’t depend on Dean, & I mean emotionally too. In s1, even after John kicked Sam out, Dean still defended & believed his father was right, & that Sam had abandoned them. Dean never stood up to John for Sam. He was too conditioned. So, Sam was the problem child, the rebellious child, to the BOTH of them; someone to be micromanaged. & in a fight, he didn’t help or defend Sam, he was the mediator, except In arguments where one person holds more power (always John), an attempt at neutrality can actually perpetuate inequality by siding with the more dominant party. & of course, Dean did actually agree with John, so the only thing Dean was really doing, was attempting to get Sam to shut up, & suck it up. But his voice was all Sam ever had control over. That was not support. He just helped in silencing Sam & stealing his autonomy. Also, u never owe gratitude to a parent simply because u received what u were owed: the basic needs of a child. & especially since Sam was never the one who asked Dean to parent him. Still, Sam is grateful to Dean for what he did, & does, & there’s nothing wrong with that, up until the point that it’s assumed Sam OWES Dean for this, which is completely ludicrous. Moving forward, in times such as season 8, or season 4, Dean is downright cruel to Sam. In general, Dean scarcely ever makes an effort to see, consider or understand Sam’s point of view, & villainizes him for choices he doesn’t even comprehend. He micromanages everything he does, treats him like a child, & refuses to let him grow up. & this is absolutely the pushing factor for the Ruby fiasco in s4. He came in, after Sam escaped the bunker, not with the mindset of helping Sam, but instead with rage. Sam only wanted to take some agency in his own life & make something good out of this evil he felt was in him (evil Dean constantly berated him about as if he had any control over what was in him) and Dean made no effort to understand this. Saying, that Sam was either completely manipulated ( which invalidates the fact that he’s capable of making his own choices & was) or he’s a monster. This removes any nuisance & condemns Sam for not simply ‘falling in line & doing whatever Dean says’ like Dean always expects. Dean is unable to respect or trust In Sam’s decisions. Which is why it’s farcical that he revokes trust to Sam in s5. He never trusted HIM before. He trusted that Sam would always defer to his decisions. This crumbled when he could not secure Sam to his side in s4. The entirety of s5 was actually Dean giving Sam room to be his own Individual for the very first time. & to get into Gadreel real quick, ppl are too desensitized to what the loss of autonomy actually* is & does, so let me paint this in a way that may appeal to your understanding. Dean allowed an angel to POSSESS ( definition: have as belonging to one; own.) Sam. To live in his body, to be privy to every most intimate thing about him, to do with him what he pleases whenever he pleases it. If you thought of that as, instead, Dean letting Sam be repeatedly r2ped in order to “save his life” would u better understand the trauma, guilt, vulnerability, the lasting effects of being so invaded!? Didn’t the whole “Man VS Bear” stand to say most would rather die than experience that violation? Because what Sam suffered was nothing short of that, yet ppl act as if Sam should be GRATEFUL, has no right to anger, or simply shouldn’t be so ‘dramatic’. But he was used. And he’s allowed to feel so.
It is sickening to hear how many ppl will claim that Sam had a good childhood, smthing to be grateful for. Dean may have felt paternal towards him, but he was NOT his father. Dean may have sacrificed for Sam, but that implies he had much to give in the first place. Dean was not an adequate substitute. & as soon as Sam was ‘old enough’, he was left behind while Dean & John hunted. Everyone blames him for his hyper independence like he ever had a choice, ever had someone he could depend on. Certainly, he couldn’t depend on Dean, & I mean emotionally too. In s1, even after John kicked Sam out, Dean still defended & believed his father was right, & that Sam had abandoned them. Dean never stood up to John for Sam. He was too conditioned. So, Sam was the problem child, the rebellious child, to the BOTH of them; someone to be micromanaged. & in a fight, he didn’t help or defend Sam, he was the mediator, except In arguments where one person holds more power (always John), an attempt at neutrality can actually perpetuate inequality by siding with the more dominant party. & of course, Dean did actually agree with John, so the only thing Dean was really doing, was attempting to get Sam to shut up, & suck it up. But his voice was all Sam ever had control over. That was not support. He just helped in silencing Sam & stealing his autonomy. Also, u never owe gratitude to a parent simply because u received what u were owed: the basic needs of a child. & especially since Sam was never the one who asked Dean to parent him. Still, Sam is grateful to Dean for what he did, & does, & there’s nothing wrong with that, up until the point that it’s assumed Sam OWES Dean for this, which is completely ludicrous. Moving forward, in times such as season 8, or season 4, Dean is downright cruel to Sam. In general, Dean scarcely ever makes an effort to see, consider or understand Sam’s point of view, & villainizes him for choices he doesn’t even comprehend. He micromanages everything he does, treats him like a child, & refuses to let him grow up. & this is absolutely the pushing factor for the Ruby fiasco in s4. He came in, after Sam escaped the bunker, not with the mindset of helping Sam, but instead with rage. Sam only wanted to take some agency in his own life & make something good out of this evil he felt was in him (evil Dean constantly berated him about as if he had any control over what was in him) and Dean made no effort to understand this. Saying, that Sam was either completely manipulated ( which invalidates the fact that he’s capable of making his own choices & was) or he’s a monster. This removes any nuisance & condemns Sam for not simply ‘falling in line & doing whatever Dean says’ like Dean always expects. Dean is unable to respect or trust In Sam’s decisions. Which is why it’s farcical that he revokes trust to Sam in s5. He never trusted HIM before. He trusted that Sam would always defer to his decisions. This crumbled when he could not secure Sam to his side in s4. The entirety of s5 was actually Dean giving Sam room to be his own Individual for the very first time. & to get into Gadreel real quick, ppl are too desensitized to what the loss of autonomy actually* is & does, so let me paint this in a way that may appeal to your understanding. Dean allowed an angel to POSSESS ( definition: have as belonging to one; own.) Sam. To live in his body, to be privy to every most intimate thing about him, to do with him what he pleases whenever he pleases it. If you thought of that as, instead, Dean letting Sam be repeatedly r2ped in order to “save his life” would u better understand the trauma, guilt, vulnerability, the lasting effects of being so invaded!? Didn’t the whole “Man VS Bear” stand to say most would rather die than experience that violation? Because what Sam suffered was nothing short of that, yet ppl act as if Sam should be GRATEFUL, has no right to anger, or simply shouldn’t be so ‘dramatic’. But he was used. And he’s allowed to feel so.

About