@mhowyvas: curhat di sini >>

່
Open In TikTok:
Region: MY
Sunday 19 April 2026 00:24:04 GMT
5484248
546728
1697
32611

Music

Download

Comments

jajashah_
JajaShah96 :
nangis pon dlam diam😌
2026-04-19 06:33:55
1215
hislsaaa_
panggilakusalsaa :
Tapi percayalah, itu sangat merusak mental, sampai kita tidak tau cara buat marah. setidaknya kalaupun tenang, kamu harus tetap bisa ngungkapin apa yang kamu rasain, kalau enggk itu akan buat kamu lebih 😞
2026-04-20 01:03:36
4234
aku_lutfiiii
✨ :
mulutku diam tapi pikiran berisik sampe²dada rasanya nyesek ujung²nya netes juga air mata
2026-04-20 13:14:45
1515
_emfh
公主❦❧ :
Sebelum jadi perempuan yg tenang tu, kita kena alami fasa yg tantrum dulu. 🙃🙏🏼
2026-04-19 14:40:17
210
cidae__
Yuyenggg ♡ :
lalu diam diam pergi hehehe
2026-04-20 00:25:46
263
crazygirll063
madebyfa :
Setulus apa pun dirimu mencintai, sekuat apa pun perjuangan yang kamu jalani, sebesar apa pun pengorbanan yang kamu beri waktu, tenaga, air mata, dan harapan pada akhirnya tidak semua cinta bisa dimenangkan hanya dengan ketulusan. Kamu boleh mencintai sehabis-habisnya, tapi jika dia tidak memilihmu, kamu tetap akan kalah oleh kenyataan. Kamu yang berharap, kamu juga yang terluka. Dan dari situ kamu akan mengerti, bahwa cinta yang paling menyakitkan adalah cinta yang diperjuangkan sendirian.🥀🥀🥀
2026-04-20 00:52:08
180
mhowyvas
່ :
ya Allah gantikanlah segala kekecewaanku dengan ribut taufan rezeki yang hebat , biar hatiku sembuh tanpa perlu membenci
2026-04-24 10:19:30
38
aprileditzz_0
──𝙍𝙖𝙮 𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙭𝙞𝙚'. :
adek, are you okay?
2026-04-22 04:08:35
14
adistiafatmariani
disti_ :
saking banyaknya diem aku sampe terkena panic attack, gerd anxiety...ternyata mental ku yang tidak aman😌
2026-04-20 04:36:52
184
nm.opq3579
ISYARRRN_☠ :
Rasulullah : "Tenagkanlah dirimu wahai ummatku .. Aku akan selalu ada untukmu" . always a reason to smile
2026-04-22 04:32:36
31
yunitanayana_ginting
𝐍α𝗒αα 𝐆𝗂𐓣𝗍𝗂𐓣𝗀 :
Ternyata capek juga harus ngalah terus😔
2026-04-19 17:03:39
123
gemini_2805
racunbyminn :
direndahin, disepelein, dihina sampe ke fisik gua diem aja ga bereaksi apapun, tapi dalem hati selalu ngomong ya Allah ini sakit banget aku cuma minta rasa sabar sama ikhlas aku di luaskan lagi
2026-04-22 10:20:00
34
ncuknzuk2
Trio N 🔥🔥🔥 :
maaf numpang curhat karna udah ga kuat gue pernah di posisi ini sering banget, pada saat hari kartini banyak banget yang makai kebaya sederhana sedangkan aku dibikinin ibuku sendiri dan aku nya dari bahwa penampilanku gak sebagus punya mereka dan akhirnya aku berangkat kesekolah ada salah satu teman dan dia termasuk besty gue juga dan disitu dia pakai kebaya bridesmaid sama besty yang satunya kembar di saat itu aku lewat didepannya namun dia berkata gini : alis bajunya kaya emak" disitu gue nahan kecewa gua sakit hati yg gue lakuin hanya bisa diam dan langsung pergi tanpa ngomong apa" di situ gue rasanya hancur hati gue namun gue tetap kuat menahan air mata meskipun gue udah ga kuat tapi di saat upacara selesai gue cerita sama temen samping bangku gue dan dia berkata * emang dia kalo bicara ga mikir "dulu * dan disitu gue belajar kuat ikhlas untuk apa yg teman gue lakuin,😭😭, Terima kasih yg udah mau dengerin cerita hati gue tank you banget maaf kalo ga jelas 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
2026-05-27 15:24:20
5
_amoynia
26 :
duh gak bisa gw emosian bgt 😭
2026-04-20 01:57:49
10
onelndutss
Caca :
sumpah cape banget kalo nahan terus tapi kalo di omongin tambah panas nantinya malah lebih sakit lagi, harus gimana dong bingung
2026-04-28 12:45:40
5
hdyatris
Yatris :
yg biasanya kalo mau nangis ya nangis, sekarang nangis pun aku tahan
2026-04-24 08:02:06
6
rawrrrrrrr1109
r🍑 :
berat bgtttt jdi anak perempuan bungsuuuu 🥺🥺🥺
2026-04-20 02:33:26
23
panggil_nama19
ℛ𝓎𝓎𝓃𝒶 :
Sakit ya sakit banget, tpi untuk apa kita mempertnyakan berulang kali hal yang kita tidak suka, tpi d anggap sepele dan ttp di lakukan, lebih baik diam daripda memberi tau, yang ada kita cuman di bilang cari masalah trus☺️
2026-04-19 12:17:17
55
qwins_1
riiiiiiin :
dan sekarang aku ada di fase ituu..
2026-04-20 03:36:18
12
cherlinana4
Cher :
terkadang diam lebih baik dari pada menjelaskan
2026-04-21 14:08:15
22
fbyni_21
hii, ini ell :
mulut ku diamm tp pikiran ku berantakan.
2026-04-20 13:34:44
6
queenly_moon11
Queenly Moon :
aku selalu begini sampe suatu saat emosiku meledak dan kalian tau reaksi orang sekitarku"aku berlebihan", sejak hari itu aku jarang bicara dengan mereka😌
2026-04-20 05:19:36
9
inirara218
naura_rara :
udah di fase kalau sakit atau marah diem tapi gabisa ngerasain apa apa kaya dingin aja ni hidup gabisa lagi nangis gabisa lagi emosi cuman diem aja kaya yaudah mau gmna lgi
2026-04-20 20:57:15
16
To see more videos from user @mhowyvas, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Who Turned China into a Bad-Debt Nation? And Now Others Are Told to Bear “Lifetime Responsibility” This is Jersey’s News Commentary Channel. On April 15, the General Office of the State Council issued the Opinions on Deepening the Reform of the Investment Approval System. One line in the document has been widely picked up as a headline:  “Implement a lifetime accountability system for decision-making on government investment projects. Leading officials and directly responsible personnel who make illegal or improper decisions causing major losses or severe negative impacts will be held strictly accountable.” At first glance, this sounds tough, righteous, and responsible. It gives the impression that from now on, those who launch projects on a whim, invest recklessly, and leave behind a mess will finally be held accountable—that their good days are over. But my first reaction to this statement was not encouragement—it was a strong sense of unreality. Because I have heard this kind of language too many times before. The document also reiterates that, unless otherwise required by the Party Central Committee, the State Council, or by law, all government investment projects must strictly go through the approval procedures of project proposals, feasibility studies, preliminary design, and investment budgeting. The problem is, none of this is new. As early as 2019, the Regulations on Government Investment had already clearly stipulated that government investment projects must prepare project proposals, feasibility study reports, and preliminary designs, and follow the proper approval procedures. Similar requirements existed even earlier. In other words, the procedures now being repackaged as “hard constraints” have been sitting there for decades. More than thirty years ago, I personally participated in drafting feasibility study reports for some government investment projects. The reports were written, the procedures were followed, every required stamp was stamped—so what? In practice, many government investment projects treat procedures as a façade, evaluation as decoration, and feasibility reports as a mere pass ticket. What people truly care about is not whether the project will generate real returns, whether it will create genuine value, or who will be held accountable if it fails. What matters is that the project gets approved first, funds arrive first, banks release loans first, construction begins first, and political achievements are secured first. As for how much is lost afterward, how much is wasted, or how much sits idle—none of that really matters. Because the losses are not borne by the market, but by public finance, banks, government financing platforms, and ultimately taxpayers. This is one of the most entrenched structural problems in China’s system: the soft budget constraint.  Spend others’ money to gamble on one’s career. Success counts as political achievement; failure is blamed on the times; losses are socialized; risks are absorbed by the state. Precisely because of this, the new document adds an important clause:  it strictly prohibits the use of state-owned enterprises or similar vehicles to disguise government investment projects as corporate projects in order to bypass approval procedures. This wording is effectively an admission that, in recent years, a large number of projects that should have been strictly regulated as government investments were repackaged, reshaped, and rerouted into platform projects, SOE projects, or quasi-corporate investments—to evade scrutiny, leverage more borrowing, and expand debt. Therefore, the real focus of this document is not the polished rhetoric about “improving scientific decision-making,” but a far more pressing reality:  there are simply too many bad debts, and the scale of losses has become too large to ignore. When investment impulses collide with mounting fiscal debt, when land finance declines meet sunk infrastructure costs, and when slogans of “high-quality develop
Who Turned China into a Bad-Debt Nation? And Now Others Are Told to Bear “Lifetime Responsibility” This is Jersey’s News Commentary Channel. On April 15, the General Office of the State Council issued the Opinions on Deepening the Reform of the Investment Approval System. One line in the document has been widely picked up as a headline: “Implement a lifetime accountability system for decision-making on government investment projects. Leading officials and directly responsible personnel who make illegal or improper decisions causing major losses or severe negative impacts will be held strictly accountable.” At first glance, this sounds tough, righteous, and responsible. It gives the impression that from now on, those who launch projects on a whim, invest recklessly, and leave behind a mess will finally be held accountable—that their good days are over. But my first reaction to this statement was not encouragement—it was a strong sense of unreality. Because I have heard this kind of language too many times before. The document also reiterates that, unless otherwise required by the Party Central Committee, the State Council, or by law, all government investment projects must strictly go through the approval procedures of project proposals, feasibility studies, preliminary design, and investment budgeting. The problem is, none of this is new. As early as 2019, the Regulations on Government Investment had already clearly stipulated that government investment projects must prepare project proposals, feasibility study reports, and preliminary designs, and follow the proper approval procedures. Similar requirements existed even earlier. In other words, the procedures now being repackaged as “hard constraints” have been sitting there for decades. More than thirty years ago, I personally participated in drafting feasibility study reports for some government investment projects. The reports were written, the procedures were followed, every required stamp was stamped—so what? In practice, many government investment projects treat procedures as a façade, evaluation as decoration, and feasibility reports as a mere pass ticket. What people truly care about is not whether the project will generate real returns, whether it will create genuine value, or who will be held accountable if it fails. What matters is that the project gets approved first, funds arrive first, banks release loans first, construction begins first, and political achievements are secured first. As for how much is lost afterward, how much is wasted, or how much sits idle—none of that really matters. Because the losses are not borne by the market, but by public finance, banks, government financing platforms, and ultimately taxpayers. This is one of the most entrenched structural problems in China’s system: the soft budget constraint. Spend others’ money to gamble on one’s career. Success counts as political achievement; failure is blamed on the times; losses are socialized; risks are absorbed by the state. Precisely because of this, the new document adds an important clause: it strictly prohibits the use of state-owned enterprises or similar vehicles to disguise government investment projects as corporate projects in order to bypass approval procedures. This wording is effectively an admission that, in recent years, a large number of projects that should have been strictly regulated as government investments were repackaged, reshaped, and rerouted into platform projects, SOE projects, or quasi-corporate investments—to evade scrutiny, leverage more borrowing, and expand debt. Therefore, the real focus of this document is not the polished rhetoric about “improving scientific decision-making,” but a far more pressing reality: there are simply too many bad debts, and the scale of losses has become too large to ignore. When investment impulses collide with mounting fiscal debt, when land finance declines meet sunk infrastructure costs, and when slogans of “high-quality develop

About