@zegert: وحيد شاه چراغي (أحمد وحيدي) أو كما يعرفه العدو "شريفي" أو كما لقبه الاعلام الايراني "محطم الأصنام" الفريد من نوعه، بكالوريوس الكترونيات، ماجستير هندسة صناعية، دكتوراه علوم استراتيجية، داعم مشروع المقـ،اومة في المنطقة، والمؤسس والقائد الأول لفيلق القُـ،دس المُبارك (الجناح الخارجي لحر،س الثو،رة)، من العسكرية إلى المدنية، عضو في مجلس تشخيص مصلحة النظام، مستشار ونائب لوزارتي الدفاع والداخلية، إلى وزير لهما، إلى مسؤول استخبا،رات الحـ،رس ومسؤول المنظومية الصا،روخية والصناعات الجوية الإيرانية، في أي موضع كان، يوظف خبراته ويكون أولوية، حتى بعد شهادة القائد اللواء محمد باكبور، تسلم قيادة الحـ،رس في معارك شهر رمضان، وتقارير العدو، تعتبر القائد وحيدي أقرب ما كان للشهـ،يد عماد مغـ،نية، أو كما يعبروا عنهم "اخوة السـ،لاح" وكما عبر عنه الصهـ،اينة قائد كتيبة لبنان في حـ،رس الثو،رة (والمقصد حُب الله) وصولًا لاتهامات بخطف عميل الـ CIA وليام باكلي (لبنان ١٩٨٤م) ورُبما أكبر عملية ارتبط اسم وحيدي بها هي تفجـ،ير وكر التجسس الصهـ،يوني (آميا) في بيونس آيريس (الارجنتين ١٩٩٤م) التي كانت حصيلتها ٨٥ قـ،تـ،يل و ٣٠٠ اصابة، وتبقى مجرد اتهامات، لا دقة ولا ادلة لها، وحيدي بث الرعب في نفوس الاعداء والهلع، وكل ما ذكر هو مما هو معروف عنه ويعرفه العدو، رُبما حاول العدو كثيرًا اغتياله، لكنه فشل، وهو مطلوب من الثمانينات لهم، لكن يد الله كانت فوق أيديهم، واستفادة الثـ،ورة من عقليته وخبراته، نسأل الله أن يكتب له النصر والعزة والاقتدار وحُسن العاقبة في سبيل الله.

zegert7
zegert7
Open In TikTok:
Region: OM
Thursday 23 April 2026 04:01:06 GMT
11152
267
1
34

Music

Download

Comments

walid.el.ahmad
Walid El Ahmad :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-04-23 04:12:53
0
To see more videos from user @zegert, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number-and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a , even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is 964, [2] where if n = 1 and In { 39n-13, if n ≥ 2. Graham's number was used by Graham in However, Graham's number can be explicitly conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was#truecringecomunnity #🍵🌊🌊 #aigenerated #51 #truecrimecomunnity
Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number-and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a , even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is 964, [2] where if n = 1 and In { 39n-13, if n ≥ 2. Graham's number was used by Graham in However, Graham's number can be explicitly conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was#truecringecomunnity #🍵🌊🌊 #aigenerated #51 #truecrimecomunnity

About