PrimalEmpress
Region: GB
Thursday 23 April 2026 16:34:26 GMT
1976
68
36
4
Music
Download
Comments
AC :
As Meghan and Harry have said: “Service is universal.” You do not have to be a working royal to give back. That is what makes them so impactful. They do this work because they truly want to make a positive difference. That is why they visit these various countries. THAT is what it is for. They are humanitarians and love bringing visibility to various causes and charities. Actually, they DO highlight their charities via sussex.com. Please visit and you will see all the highlights.
2026-04-24 00:01:11
8
mycapsulekitchen :
I’m in Australia. I think being seen as royal helps them in their popularity and success. So a tour that looks royal helps remind everyone that they are in fact royal adjacent, working or not. So the buzz it creates is important to them to remain relevant.
2026-04-23 23:10:04
4
Debra :
I just don’t think ( for whatever reason ) they have the public pull that the royal family does . Them going to a hospital with minimal crowd attention isn’t going to generate a great deal. I don’t really get what they are trying to do
2026-04-24 11:35:56
6
Michelle Morgan :
What Meghan wore to Bondi Beach is still on the website, never removed! And the same tabloids that trash Meghan are doing fashion articles where they highlight her clothing with affiliate links. The Sussex.com website highlights the philanthropic work Harry and Meghan do with a more detailed description much more effective than the snippets of information then you could ever put in a social media post.
2026-04-24 11:55:27
1
Chez :
It’s self promotion, that’s all it is. They need to make money, I’m not sure why she doesn’t go back to acting and he can concentrate on his charities. I feel if that’s what they had done originally rather than the books and interviews about their family they might have been more successful tbh.
2026-04-23 18:09:30
17
Username.24601 :
Is it because they are afraid the backlash will result in less money for the charities?
2026-04-23 16:55:10
2
ridinsolo :
Bc they r not working royals and they now provide for themselves, why is it a problem with anything they do that is considered charity or humanitarian work? I don’t understand.
2026-04-24 19:25:57
1
CBW :
lots of people do exactly what they do. the media merely covers harry and meghan
2026-04-28 10:27:23
0
LoveOurRoyals :
It’s because it’s all about Me me me
2026-04-23 21:12:26
2
Antonio :
“They’re not doing enough to be genuinely benevolent.” That’s what you said. What a sentence. What a throne to perch on, dispensing moral verdicts like a reluctant monarch of virtue. Because one must ask, by what measure? And measured against whom? Respectfully, you don’t know what you’re talking about. You’re judging from a screen, while Prince Harry and Meghan are on the ground, in places like Colombia and Nigeria not just waving, but asking what do you need, writing cheques, connecting donors, building partnerships.That’s real work. Not theatre. When the "working" Royals travel it cost millions to the visiting country. Meanwhile, you hold them to a standard you don’t apply to others. Where was this outrage for Prince Andrew? Where is it when institutions disappear from their own charities for years, yes, even Catherine, Princess of Wales faced criticism when a patronage said they hadn’t seen or heard from her. But Meghan? She must prove her “benevolence” on demand. HRH Prince Michael of Kent, used his titles, gave paid speeches, also worked with charities.And I'll leave the Putin / Russia scandal out. Sarah did the same for years and she was divorced from Andrew. Zara Tindall and Mike have no titles but boy do they benefit from being a family member. For nearly a decade, UK media has fed on Meghan, monetizing her image, her clothing, her very existence, down to the stitch and the seam. Entire industries built on her visibility. And now, now that she dares to reclaim even a fraction of that economy, you call it a "grift" Let’s be honest. This isn’t about charity. It’s about control. Because when they show up quietly, it’s “not enough.” When they’re visible, it’s “self-serving.” So which is it? Or is the truth simpler… No version of them will ever satisfy you. You accept whatever version of them the tabloid sells you but question their intentions. You think you're being balanced...far from the truth.
2026-04-24 06:06:29
6
Michelle Morgan :
And Harry in Ukraine, with his speech single-handedly brought the war in Ukraine back into public consciousness. There are very few people on the planet who could have done that, it was so badly needed and he used his platform to do it.
2026-04-24 11:43:29
3
To see more videos from user @primalempress, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
