@meghannmcuniff: A lawyer for a California woman who's in prison for killing two young brothers while speeding in her SUV told a jury in a civil trial that she wasn’t impaired or racing another driver but "there was a rush to judgment to immediately determine" the crash was her fault. Esther Holm is a partner in Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP's Orange County office. Her clients are Rebecca Grossman and her husband, Peter, who are being sued for wrongful death along with Grossman's ex-boyfriend, former professional baseball player Scott Erickson. Grossman and Erickson were speeding alongside each other in their Mercedes SUVs on Sept. 29, 2020, when Grossman struck Mark Iskander, 11, and his brother Jacob Iskander, 8, while they crossed the road in a marked crosswalk with their mother and younger brother near Westlake Village in west Los Angeles County. A jury in 2024 convicted Grossman, now 62, of two counts of second-degree murder, two counts of vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence and one count of hit and run driving resulting in death or serious injury. She is serving 15 years to life in prison. An appellate panel affirmed her convictions in a 143-page opinion issued March 17. Erickson was not charged with a crime. He’s expected to testify in the jury trial that began Friday (April 24) in Judge Huey P. Cotton’s courtroom at the Los Angeles County Superior Court branch courthouse in LA’s Van Nuys neighborhood. Lawyer Brian Panish, who represents the boys' parents, told jurors in his opening statement that Grossman will “never admit” she was at fault @Meghann Cuniff, and Holm made that clear in her opening statement. “We believe the evidence will show Ms. Grossman was not driving impaired. She did have a margarita, but we believe the evidence will show she was not impaired,” Holm said. She did not mention that tests placed Grossman’s blood-alcohol content at .08 — the legal limit for driving in California — three hours after the crash. Panish told jurors in his opening that Grossman also had Benzodiazepines (benzos) in her system, which is a prescription central nervous system depressant. Holm said Grossman "never saw the children in the crosswalk" and "did not try to flee the scene." “You heard a bunch of witnesses that Mr. Panish brought up. All these people are going to say this and that. But not one of those people, not one of those persons, can come in here and tell you they knew what she was thinking," Holm said. “There's not going to be a psychic or a psychiatrist or psychologist that comes in here and says, ‘Ms. Grossman meant to do this,’ or … ‘She was clearly doing that.'" “The only person who knows what Ms. Grossman had in her head is Ms. Grossman. So while well, people can say, ‘Oh, I believe this is what happened,’ it's speculation,” Holm continued. Grossman is not expected to testify. She’s currently at the California Institution for Women in Corona, according to California prison records. You can watch Holm’s entire opening on my YouTube channel or Facebook page, where you also can find Panish’s opening and the testimony of the first witness, Michael Hale, and investigator with the Orange County District Attorney's Office. #law #court #crime #lawyer

Meghann Cuniff
Meghann Cuniff
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Sunday 26 April 2026 16:16:22 GMT
42615
693
76
37

Music

Download

Comments

bradg8152
bradg8152 :
Terrible opening. "The evidence will show" is old and unconvincing language.
2026-04-26 20:25:23
379
arieshellonwheels69
Headless Gal :
Temo defense attorney
2026-04-27 02:01:34
152
bayridgepizzalvr
Carmela Soprano :
Lawyer #3
2026-04-27 00:18:15
17
bigpanty99
SrGrande :
Racing or not she was still speeding going 70+ in a 45 mph zone that alone is negligence
2026-04-28 08:02:55
168
lazy_closetgirl
lazy_closetgirl :
Ummm one drink is impairment……
2026-04-26 17:35:24
97
fatkid05
fatkid05 :
Who else’s fault could it be for speeding and hitting a family on a crosswalk?
2026-04-26 16:25:58
128
its_tewj
Its_tewj :
How big was said margarita?
2026-04-26 18:10:46
75
robowogi5ao
robowogi5ao :
81 in a 45 with a legal amount of alcohol in her system isnt a good defense
2026-04-28 18:08:37
37
damagedcrow
Phoenix’s Damaged Crow :
She was found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal case and is serving 15 years. Civil cases are preponderance, which is a much lower threshold and the criminal result is admissible.
2026-04-27 13:47:49
35
mysticattorney
mysticattorney :
Truly bad opening
2026-04-29 04:55:55
8
rocko1934
Rockey :
The evidence was 73+ mph and no braking at TOI
2026-04-28 09:34:47
19
tobias9550
Tobias88 :
Absolutely disgusting
2026-04-28 15:26:37
5
pf25983
pf😡 :
Yes, a 0.05% BAC (Blood Alcohol Concentration) limit is the standard for most of continental Europe (e.g., France, Germany, Spain, Italy). However, legal limits vary by country, ranging from zero-tolerance in nations like the Czech Republic and Romania to 0.02%-0.04%. Don't tell me that you need 4 drinks to become impaired. Impairment starts at very low levels!!
2026-04-26 22:55:34
33
janelle.pereira1
Janelle :
What a joke
2026-04-26 16:58:11
8
pjsd2828
PJSD2828 :
Lawyers will defend anyone for enough $$$
2026-05-13 03:23:10
3
jeremyhernandez4148
Chrono :
um when I had to do a 6 month substance abuse traffic offender program they try and teach you if ya blow anything at all it's considered impaired driving sooooooo
2026-05-18 16:22:02
1
imrtl_wzrd33
Von :
Well the one thing they do know is her actions are the reason two lives are lost, so it wouldn’t matter what she was thinking in the moment..
2026-04-28 17:10:07
5
lecroy213
Lecroy :
Doesn’t matter if she saw them or not… she was going 30+ over the speed limit.
2026-04-28 17:32:56
4
woogtok
Woogie :
Maybe I’m cracked but imo even if what this lawyer is saying is true, this is still negligence. It’s not like the car malfunctioned. She had a duty to not drive into people on the road and she failed at that, period,
2026-05-01 02:07:02
1
joshwallace94
Josh :
The evidence will show if she was going anywhere near the speed limit there would not have been an issue regardless of being able to see the crosswalk or not.
2026-04-30 01:40:19
1
jlaw2294
Jay and Jenn Lawlor :
Umm…she could see them cuz she was driving at 81 mph or about 117 feet per second
2026-04-28 12:12:51
4
aaront41
AT :
Everything she said still doesn’t excuse 30 mph over the limit when she hit two children
2026-04-28 16:59:16
2
attorneyayda
Ayda Mirafshar, Esq. :
The defense stands no chance
2026-04-27 00:19:00
5
jagdhd1574
J :
Money can buy happiness just not a good lawyer
2026-04-29 10:49:25
2
To see more videos from user @meghannmcuniff, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About