@william.americanm: ⚖️ CLAIM VS TANAKH — WHERE IT BREAKS 🔹 CLAIM 1: “THE WORD = A PERSON (JESUS)” What the Tanakh actually shows: The “Word of YHWH” is: His speech (He said… and it was) His command His instruction (Torah) Example: Genesis 1 → God speaks creation Isaiah 55:11 → His word goes out and accomplishes His will 👉 The Word is something YHWH uses, not someone He is. The contradiction: The poster turns an action/extension of God into a separate being. That shift is not in the Tanakh at all. 🔹 CLAIM 2: “THE WORD BECAME FLESH” (This is straight from John 1:14, even if not written on the poster) What the Tanakh says about God: God is not a man Numbers 23:19 God does not become human 1 Samuel 15:29 👉 YHWH doesn’t transform into flesh. He remains unchanging and not human. The contradiction: Saying the Word (which they claim is God) became a man directly clashes with: “God is not a man…” You can’t have both without redefining God. 🔹 CLAIM 3: “JESUS = YHWH” What the Tanakh is crystal clear on: YHWH is ONE Deuteronomy 6:4 He does not share His identity: Isaiah 42:8 → “My glory I give to no other” 👉 No second figure is ever introduced as equal to YHWH Himself. The contradiction: The poster merges: YHWH → Word → Jesus → God But the Tanakh never: Identifies a man as YHWH Splits YHWH into multiple persons Or presents YHWH as incarnating 🔹 CLAIM 4: USING “LOGOS” TO DEFINE GOD Here’s the quiet move being made: “Logos” is a Greek philosophical term Meaning: reason, logic, divine ordering principle Problem: The Tanakh was written in Hebrew thought, not Greek philosophy. 👉 In Hebrew: “Dabar” (word) = speech, command, matter Not a cosmic person or divine entity The contradiction: They import a Greek definition and then read it back into Hebrew scripture. That’s not interpretation—that’s replacement. 🧠 THE CORE ISSUE If someone says: “Tanakh is the final authority” Then they have to answer this honestly: 👉 Where in the Tanakh does it ever say: The Word is a separate divine person? God will become a man? A man will be equal to YHWH Himself? Not hinted. Not assumed. Clearly stated. 🎯 BOTTOM LINE (NO SPIN) This poster teaches: YHWH = The Word = Jesus = God But the Tanakh teaches: YHWH is one and not a man His Word is His command—not a person He does not become flesh He does not share His identity ⚠️ So what has to give? You can’t hold both positions fully. Either: You reinterpret the Tanakh through later writings OR You reject the poster’s equation as something added later

William “24 Books” Scruggs

Open In TikTok:

Region: US

Monday 27 April 2026 12:32:34 GMT