@feel8266xr9: #audit #fyp #foryou #police #usa🇺🇸

Frostyfixer :

Police misconduct in the U.S. has cost taxpayers tens of billions of dollars since 2000 — and that’s only what’s been officially recorded. Major cities alone pay out hundreds of millions every few years for wrongful arrests, excessive force, and misconduct. The real cost is likely much higher, since many cases are never fully reported. And behind every dollar is a person whose rights were violated.

mundane man :

I hope u got paid

troysjourney2 :

Droklin Icepetal :

so... if I can ask is there a part 2 please put it up.

Devlin Oneal :

Apocalyps_❌_74🇳🇱 :

skilo :

🤣🤣🤣

carylbreidel :

Land of the free

Richard Bowman :

The Incident Overview The interaction began when Officer Robles and his partner stopped Miller for allegedly jaywalking (crossing the street more than 100 feet from a crosswalk). At the time, Miller was openly carrying a rifle. Officer Robles immediately disarmed Miller, removed the magazine, and placed him in handcuffs, sparking a heated verbal exchange regarding Miller's rights and the officer's authority to disarm a law-abiding citizen. Legal & Practical Outcomes 1. Arrest Status Detention vs. Arrest: Although Miller was placed in handcuffs, he was not formally arrested or charged with a crime on that day. Resolution: After a supervisor arrived on the scene (as Miller repeatedly requested in the video), the situation was de-escalated. The supervisor determined that Miller had not committed a jailable offense and was within his rights to open carry. Property Return: Miller’s rifle and magazine were returned to him on-site, and he was released. 2. Officer Discipline Internal Affairs Investigation: Following the viral spread of the footage, the SAPD conducted an internal review. Disciplinary Action: Officer Robles was issued a written reprimand. The department found that while the initial stop for jaywalking was legally permissible, the immediate disarming and handcuffing of Miller without specific evidence of a crime or a direct threat was a violation of department policy and Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable seizure. Policy Refresher: The incident led to additional training for SAPD officers regarding the nuances of Texas open carry laws and the rights of citizens to record police interactions.

Kevin Scott :

feelings enforcement officers.

George :

Have no right to TOUCH his PROPERTY

inyourguts27 :

the new cop may come away clean because he looked apprehensive, the other ones I'm sure we're part of the lawsuit that was filed.

Jacob :

yup when they Know they fucked up when say "it's for MY safety" because it can make them not lose their immunity most the time because it's such a low bar...

native :

perfect example of why the people want to defund the police for this level of criminal activity by police

heyguy349 :

They need to fire all these police officers immunity

Steven [email protected] :

why are there so many bad cops still working that doesn't know the laws should be fired

Shane Marcum :

when did they pass the law you have to know every single cop? makes no sense

Tiphoon :

👀 Sounds like easy Lawsuit & easy Payday 💰

joe picanco :

there are no good cops no more

C. W. 🇨🇦 :

Fake cops

Steven [email protected] :

Sue the hell out of the police department and cops and City

Pierre Boaventura Souza Silva :

Queria saber é o pós...🤔 Como se resolve isso? Vai para o tribunal? Os policiais são punidos ou os indivíduos que estão gravando?

Darcy Cherrington :

sorin :

these policemen are always aggressive