@belle.liuu: Don’t fall for this TWISTED mistranslation of John 1:1 by Jehovah’s Witnesses. They say Jesus is “a god”…. but any genuine reading of the text shows that Jesus is the Most High God. #jesus #cult #jehovahswitness #christiantiktok

Faith in Action MM :

I’m confused, are you for or against Jehovah’s Witnesses?

Belle Liu :

Sorry for the chopped audio! Working on getting it better 🤍

Godisjustice :

Prove me wrong... Trinity is nowhere found in the Bible nor Jesus has any teaching about it. Debunk this statement if you think you can.

Jaguarsfan88 :

I learn so much from your tik toks

Shonin :

that's not the only translation that says that. and we are correct

clintloudermilk :

also mary is the mother of Jesús christ not the mother of god

Marc :

I'm not a JW. I agree with you. if you study the scriptures, they are the closest to what the bible teaches

Usernckfkdkdhejejekek :

You do realise there are many translations that agree with the NWT?

moses livingstone :

In John 1:1 Jesus is theos ( God or a god) The one that he was with however is ton Theon ( The God). John was highlighting that they are both mighty supernatural spirit beings, but one ranks higher than the other.

Belle Liu :

Full vid on YT: BelleLiuApologetics

creatinesniffler :

yes mamm

Carpe Diem :

dan_ivkv :

Seed planted. 👏🏼

Logan :

ahora yo les pregunto, ya envestigaron como disen en las traducciones antiguas, y en los escritos originales??

clintloudermilk :

the word was with god and was god showing 2 individuals in one essence the word was with god and was a god is no differents both show 2 individuals in one essence

Jade3 :

Read Matthew 3 verse 17.

Alonso :

While many Bible translators render the verse this way, others see the need to render it differently. In the original-language text, the two occurrences of “God” (Greek, the·osʹ) at John 1:1 are grammatically different. In the first occurrence, the word “God” is preceded by the Greek definite article, while the article does not appear before the second occurrence. Many scholars note that the absence of the definite article before the second the·osʹ is significant. For example, The Translator’s New Testament says regarding this absence of the article: “In effect it gives an adjectival quality to the second use of Theos (God) so that the phrase means ‘The Word was divine.’” b Other scholars c and Bible translations point to this same distinction. Complete article: https://www.jw.org/finder?wtlocale=E&docid=502300113&srcid=share

Alonso :

The way in which we understand Jhon 20:28 must be in line with other biblical passages. For example takin about Jehova: "He is One, and there is no other besides him’" Mark 12:32

l′Écossais :

give an award to this girl

Gar :

luke 1:32 Jesus is the son of the most high

artur :

This verse says ‘in the beginning,’ whereas God has no beginning.

clintloudermilk :

the only true God is the father and Jesús christ is lord seated at the right hand of god the word gave up its devine privileges born a human being and appeared in human form fully human and the father work through jesus christ and raised him from the dead and the holy spirit was never called god Jesús christ had a god that delagated authority and power also exalted him to the most highest position after he ascended to the father they are 2 individuals the father and the son

clintloudermilk :

the word became flesh born a human being and appeared in human form fully human and the father the only true God delagated authority and power to jesús christ and work through him jesus was not god on earth the word was devine the human jesus christ was fully human