@abyanabdirahman90: Ilahay talo saaro 🥹🧕🏻🤲🏾#ilaahow_noodambi_dhaf #wacdi_iyo_waano #muslim

Abyan qurux
Abyan qurux
Open In TikTok:
Region: SO
Wednesday 29 April 2026 08:54:55 GMT
17868
5310
24
541

Music

Download

Comments

user8113515402309
maria :
allahu akbar❤️
2026-06-15 16:23:20
0
asmo3220
Hayad💖💓 :
Allah🥰🥰
2026-06-10 20:27:26
0
myquee184
in mustafe :
👑
2026-06-07 05:20:40
0
ibaadaqurx2021
Drs Amiisha :
sax wllhi 🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
2026-06-08 04:28:10
0
qeeunsagal
Adna maxamed :
scw🤲🥰
2026-06-05 23:37:34
0
amino.maxamed611
amino maxamed :
allha abkar 🤲🤲🤲🤲
2026-06-08 14:55:48
0
qaboow132
Qaboow1 :
2026-05-13 11:47:56
0
qeeunsagal
Adna maxamed :
allahu akbar 🤲🥰
2026-06-05 23:37:40
0
carfoon504
Carfoon👸❤ :
2026-06-08 10:49:08
0
kibirleyyyyyyyyy
isku filan🦋 :
Allahu Akbar
2026-06-11 15:41:30
0
raxmo1282
Raxmo :
2026-06-04 19:11:48
0
queensahra69
queen sahra752 :
🙏🙏🙏
2026-06-15 18:29:10
0
shacniyey821
shacniyey💞💞💞💞 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-06-01 08:49:35
0
user5337991557539
maxamed :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-06-11 10:03:50
0
munaabdilahi28
muuna dheeman :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-06-13 21:46:40
0
myquee184
in mustafe :
👑👑👑
2026-06-07 05:20:30
0
falis9497
falis :
🤲🤲🤲
2026-06-05 11:54:28
0
fahmom595
maxamed maxamuud :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-06-05 06:30:00
0
siyaaali25
siyà ali :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-04-29 10:06:47
0
poqoradaapka
inDHozzz🫶👀❤️‍🩹 :
♥️♥️♥️
2026-06-15 16:32:41
0
siman8499
anfaceyyyyyy💥👸✨️ :
🤲🤲🤲
2026-05-06 08:31:39
0
ikrancabdillaahi
Ikran Cabdillaahi :
😭😭😭😭😭💔😭
2026-05-04 13:20:55
0
queensahra69
queen sahra752 :
😭😭😭
2026-06-15 18:29:10
0
queensahra69
queen sahra752 :
🙏🙏🙏
2026-06-15 18:29:16
0
To see more videos from user @abyanabdirahman90, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

pozzi edit Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form  a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is  g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if  n = 1  and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if  n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.||#pozzitifon #pozzi #furri #rampage #edit #fyp #elbruso #creatorsearchinsights #кепочник
pozzi edit Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.||#pozzitifon #pozzi #furri #rampage #edit #fyp #elbruso #creatorsearchinsights #кепочник

About