professorofyap
Region: US
Wednesday 29 April 2026 17:16:26 GMT
98333
6893
42
272
Music
Download
Comments
David parkinson :
you can't justify a man marrying a 6 year old and doing the deed when she turned 9
2026-05-07 18:12:59
58
TheHeartEmperor :
The ummah appreciates you akhi
2026-05-06 19:00:06
323
…gg :
I feel like you just explained what happened with context that didn't solve anything. Khadija was the prophets first wife, and she is also praised as being the second ever Muslim and first Female Muslim. She had all his children except one, two boys and four girls. The three boys all died early with none of them making it past a year old, the girls lived longer but only Fatima, his last daughter, outlived him. The only other child he had was Ibrahim and that was with Maria al-Qibtiyya. This a mainly Sunni view btw. the Shia view is that Ruqayya, Umm Kulthum, and Zainab were adopted (they are the first three girls), I suspect this is because the prophet also had a foster son Zayd ibn Harithah. Another thing to note is that Khadija was older than the prophet, some sources say she was 28 others say 40( I personally thought that she was 40). Back to the Aisha, First she wasn't married to give birth to his children or anything or the sort , she was the third wife after Khadija and Sawda (Khadija was dead by this time due to old age) and she wasn't originally supposed to marry the prophet she was supposed to marry Jubayr ibn Mut'im, who was basically the son of a Pagan ally, which was very rare at the time. Also it wasn't her father's idea but Khawla bint Hakim's idea to get the prophet married to all his wives after Khadija's death. This was mainly because the Prophet needed much emotional support at the time. Aisha should be remembered not as the youngest wife of the prophet but as one of the Greatest Muslims to have lived, she was a scholar, poet, mentor, General and the person responsible for narrating 2210 Hadiths. The conversations about her name have only brought shame to her reputation, It's genuinely annoying that someone so great can be insulted this way. The prophet had ten Wives after Aisha, all Widows and Victims of discrimination against Muslims, none were virgins, actually Aisha was the only virgin the prophet eve married. So please when talking about the Prophets Wives, speak of Khadija first, She was a successful business woman who was basically of nobility due to how influential and successful she was. And speak highly of Aisha's name
2026-05-06 21:18:59
7
Bastitio :
Thanks for all this context, I appreciate it.
2026-04-30 13:35:39
124
Yusri Shaggy Sapari :
Thank you brother 🙏
2026-05-06 14:27:49
30
tumtume2018 :
most of those people are elites so... nothing have changed in history. The elites love to diddle kids
2026-05-11 20:29:49
2
Wazzwazz :
Thanks for the clarification
2026-05-07 09:23:20
9
licuccii :
You should reduce the background music
2026-05-07 06:09:31
37
MYSTIC-x-BLADE :
There are serious historical contradictions, and even within Sunni scholarship this issue is debated.. I'd like to share some clarifications here 👇🏽
2026-04-30 00:37:20
32
Nocompromise :
You say..." now its within this precise timeline..." But its not a precise timeline is it? How are you establishing this " precise timeline?
2026-05-07 04:20:19
7
kingbob2297 :
Fire
2026-05-01 13:35:56
7
Hamlouchi :
Meh
2026-05-01 21:23:47
6
Nocompromise :
First of all how do you know they are " real life figures"? What historical proofs are you using to establish their historicity?
2026-05-06 18:58:51
1
AITheChillGuy :
There is no debate about it between scholars
2026-05-07 07:45:32
3
paybacktime25 :
How old
2026-05-07 02:05:48
2
Malik esco :
SAW
2026-05-07 05:30:51
1
azizicutz :
👏🏽
2026-04-29 21:36:01
5
✞GODOY✞ :
I get what you’re trying to do but you kinda gave the whole thing away without realizing it. You admit the sources like Bukhari and Muslim say 6 and 9, then say “it was normal back then” and “it’s wrong today” but that doesn’t solve the issue, it creates it. If Muhammad is supposed to be a timeless moral example, you can’t fall back on “7th century context” when something doesn’t hold up. That logic works for kings, not prophets of God. “Everyone did it” isn’t a defense either. Slavery was common too, doesn’t make it right. A prophet is supposed to correct culture, not reflect it. And saying “don’t use it as precedent” just proves the point. If you need later principles to override his example then his example alone isn’t sufficient as a moral standard. So the real tension is simple, you’re calling him the perfect model while also admitting part of his example has to be set aside. That’s not just nuance, that’s a contradiction.
2026-05-01 21:28:43
136
Arangzeeb_returns :
You're just stuck with one hadith. There are other hadiths that she MABP says she reach puberty before her family became Muslim, She narrates she is tall as the Prophet Mohammed S.A.W, There's hadiths says that her 10 years older sister got married age 28 and Aysha got married year later. We cannot isolate hadiths.
2026-05-07 16:12:20
21
أيوب السيف القحطاني 414 :
Human rights, women's rights, and other 20th-century movements are not obligatory for Islam.
2026-05-07 03:51:08
9
iamjustaskingquestions :
I appreciate your analysis, I think the distinction that is important to make is that even if it was historically unremarkable for the time, if Muhammad (PBUH) is meant to be a universal moral example then it’s hard to square his marriage to Aisha within the context of modern moral customs. In a sense, it was either wrong then and Muhammad is not a moral example for all time or it was wrong and Muhammad is a flawed human like the rest of us and not a perfect moral example. If there are some actions which are specific to him (i.e. permissible because of his standing) then that’s really avoiding the question of the moral character of the action itself. You said yourself it was wrong by all standards. Would be interested to hear your thoughts on whether the prophet (PBUH) can be considered of high moral standards generally or a “perfect moral example”, with all due respect? (I am not Muslim just trying to understand so my apologies if I misstated anything)
2026-04-29 23:29:43
29
420pakster :
yeah but the differance is that muhammed is claiming to be guided by an all knowing all benevalont god. So human ignorance of intrinsic harm does not apply here, as timeless benevolance would not permit or regulate intrinsic harm, such as child-marriage or sex-slavery, it would prohibit it. that's the issue.
2026-05-14 17:02:51
3
Ray :
I honestly still cannot understand why it's wrong for others but ok to Muhammad. If a prophet see his people doing immoral thing, he should condemned it, not join. Honestly I love the content and I want to be respectful, but can anyone give me an respectful explain why Muhammad is morally superior to Christ. Don't be mad I just want to learn from the Muslim. I know you will hate if I condemned Islam without knowing it first
2026-06-04 05:12:12
0
To see more videos from user @professorofyap, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
