slide 3 is wrong. human random selection is biased to numbers that end. pick a random number between 2 and 3 -> 2.7 comes out way more than e.
2026-04-30 15:33:15
351
Thedoomguy111 :
3 is wrong, mathematically speaking the set of natural numbers is a subset of the set of integers, and the set of integers is a subset of the set of rational numbers AND the set or rational numbers is a subset of real numbers, so every integer is a rational number, 3 is also 6/2, 9/3, 12/4, 5 is also 10/2, 15/3, 20/4 and so on
2026-05-27 19:29:01
0
🎧♒ :
infinity^-1 = zero
2026-05-28 17:46:42
49
Ludovico_colaci :
4 is wrong because the minimum is 1 not 0
2026-04-30 14:09:09
162
hola :
the third one IS technically right but the probability of It being irracional IS also 0
2026-05-27 14:24:31
1
user5529303991305 :
Slide 3 - should be ‘tending towards 0’
2026-05-25 18:39:43
2
User :
3 doesn’t account for the fact that the majority of people would view choosing a number as choosing an integer
2026-06-21 15:29:05
4
Хлорид кальция :
3 is why I hate probability topic, because the P for choosing exact number=0, and for every other it's 1, but when you pick, you get P=0
2026-05-30 22:04:48
0
Tozy2009 :
Or just use a 1.6x conversion?
2026-04-30 21:10:19
25
Indestinate :
well yeah since fibonacci is n
1 * 1.6182....^n
2026-05-22 16:49:11
0
lebonbons top 1 edger :
can anyone explain the last one
2026-05-23 12:55:49
1
Кластер Б :
because Miles in km is 1≈1,61
phi coefficient is 1,618
2026-06-05 21:33:18
1
friendly_bs :
You are getting a follow🔥
2026-06-18 10:14:44
0
Simon :
does the last slide read Comedy Space Center?
2026-05-07 15:18:19
1
JDC :
This is too smart for me
2026-05-25 14:08:28
0
Marnie :
g = 10
2026-06-19 16:07:06
1
rinoeterra :
the miles to km thing is really useful
2026-06-06 04:32:03
0
me :
if americans only knew what imperial was
2026-06-21 11:33:11
0
apoyu sikiyor🤤 :
😁😁😁
2026-05-04 14:17:23
1
The Voice of Somewhere :
😂😂
2026-04-29 18:30:36
0
To see more videos from user @sciencefunn, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.