@olavv.5:

👣

Open In TikTok:

Region: ID

Saturday 02 May 2026 09:49:20 GMT

77985

20058

38

1335

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.64MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (1.64MB) Watermark .mp4 (3.2MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Hii inii raa💤 :

ya Allah ngene men to

2026-06-12 15:15:44

10

Tizzz Bizzz :

gara² ego jadi bubarr😭

2026-06-12 09:26:54

14

wandaaa'🐳 :

ego+ego=supri

2026-06-12 15:47:56

2

☞pannstc×͜× :

walaaa

2026-06-12 16:21:34

1

olyne :

mumet

2026-06-12 15:38:22

0

Adit Ganteng :

Adit

2026-06-11 11:17:30

1

bebell. :

lueh milih asing demi kebaikan masing'

2026-06-12 14:39:23

1

litutt👣 :

Podo Podo moh kelangan e tapi sek Atos atosan ego.

2026-06-12 16:04:41

0

inott 🤍🙆🏻‍♀️ :

@🚭

2026-06-10 22:32:30

1

gall :

@donat

2026-06-02 14:55:06

3

👀 :

@⁰³ @?

2026-06-12 10:13:03

0

pis :

@dytcńta￣p2

2026-06-03 12:39:04

2

kamugkpapalaaaa👶🏻💃🏻👀 :

@JB || SATRAEL. STORE

2026-06-11 07:09:40

1

𝐇𝐢,𝐈𝐍𝐈 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐚𝐚𝟎𝟐? :

@Pahhh @pahh

2026-06-12 14:30:24

0

𝚠𝚘𝚙𝚜𝚜 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚊𝚊 :

woahhh nekk akuu ga boss ego+peredam kok 😭😭@Binzz⚡🌊

2026-06-12 16:02:58

0

NURIL 2011 :

@tiang.jawi05 lah yooo ikuuu yanggg 😞

2026-06-12 15:48:13

1

pirzaaa🌀 :

@zarr🐊 nah

2026-06-12 14:37:58

0

a :

@#MUNIRR ELK

2026-06-12 16:36:30

0

@𝕹𝕬𝖀𝕱𝕬𝕷 :

@Syaaa_🎀🙌🏻 ☺️

2026-06-12 14:29:57

0

na_ana :

@GARAGE WONOGIRI

2026-06-12 13:05:39

0

زيدنا أولياء :

@?

2026-06-09 04:45:54

1

To see more videos from user @olavv.5, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

$What a lovely day in Paris❤️ || Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a^{b^{c^{\cdot^{\cdot^{\cdot}}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is \bm{g_{64}} where \bm{g_n} { 3 \bm{\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow} 3 if n 1 and 3 \bm{\uparrow^{g_{n-1}}} 3 if n \bm{\geq} 2. \bm{{\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.#paris #2015 #rampage #actor #treanding$
What a lovely day in Paris❤️ || Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a^{b^{c^{\cdot^{\cdot^{\cdot}}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is \bm{g_{64}} where \bm{g_n} { 3 \bm{\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow} 3 if n 1 and 3 \bm{\uparrow^{g_{n-1}}} 3 if n \bm{\geq} 2. \bm{{\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.#paris #2015 #rampage #actor #treanding

Sheikh saalax mucalim Cabdulaahi

Sheikh saalax mucalim Cabdulaahi

El primero de este 2026 ⭐️🎵

El primero de este 2026 ⭐️🎵

Justificados, temos paz com Deus

Justificados, temos paz com Deus

#somalitiktok #viral?videotiktok😇😇 #creatorsearchinsights #views #somalilandtiktok💚🤍❤ @HALAQ TV 𓃵

#somalitiktok #viral?videotiktok😇😇 #creatorsearchinsights #views #somalilandtiktok💚🤍❤ @HALAQ TV 𓃵

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy