@audittime: (Part 1) "You Could Have Been Behind Our Gate!" First Amendment #audit #1stamendment #1stamendmentaudit #firstamendment #firstamendmentaudit #copwatch #knowyourrights #civilrights #viral #fyp #trending

DUGZ :

Why’s an officer covering his face????

MysticFlow :

guilty until proven innocent.

Proud Trot Mycology :

best auditor, this guy is a personal hero of mine 👏 💪

THUNDER :

Nice lawsuit

ziggo73 :

sounds like a false report to me

Apple User scorecard :

Land of the free

On point :

The police have no respect for the people. They are never held accountable for their actions. That’s the problem.

Wade :

Enjoy that IA complaint

Joshuma32 :

Should ask him “is that what you’re going to say when my lawyer asks during your deposition?”

Redgrave :

the fact theyre all wearing masks. this is hell

Gus :

Guilty until proven innocent.

Domz ~~+ :

They seemed to forgot that they are Public Servant ?

redbullz23 :

America is no longer free

ginger :

Waste of tax money if I’ve ever seen it

ian :

And they wonder why the cops are hated

Sebastien Gauvin Lan :

That attitude changed real quick 😂😂

User1264 :

America, the land of the free😂😂😂 we don’t see this freedom.

skreamies :

The same officers who said they couldn’t breath under those masks but now decide to wear them lmao

Phi B :

Kelly75 :

straight to bullyboy tactics 🙄

wolfie :

just another lawsuit easy money

SANDRA :

Another officer saw him inside the gate ? Just wanted to dbl check…so they lied.

Richard Bowman :

Case Outcome: Arrest vs. Release No Arrest: Despite the heated exchange and the officers' claims that the auditor was being "detained" for a trespass investigation, the auditor was not arrested. After the officers finished "checking the video" (as mentioned several times in the clip), they were unable to establish Reasonable Articulable Suspicion (RAS) or probable cause that a crime had been committed. The Trespass Claim: The officers attempted to use California Penal Code 602 (Trespass) as the basis for the stop. However, the auditor correctly pointed out that under California law, a person generally cannot be arrested for trespassing on property open to the public unless they refuse to leave after being asked by the owner or a peace officer, or if there is clear "No Trespassing" signage—neither of which applied to his location on the sidewalk/public easement. Officer Discipline No Formal Discipline: There is no public record of formal disciplinary action (such as suspension or termination) against Officers Miguez, Moore, or Olsen regarding this specific encounter. The "Identify" Dispute: A major point of contention in the full video is the auditor's demand for the officers' names and badge numbers. While California law and CHP policy generally require officers to identify themselves upon request, the delay or refusal by Officer Miguez is often cited by critics as a policy violation. However, such incidents are typically handled through internal "retraining" rather than public-facing discipline. Officer Olsen's Interaction: As noted in the video's captions, Officer Olsen is often highlighted in the full version for being the "seasoned" officer who de-escalated the situation by immediately providing his name and ID, which eventually led to the conclusion of the contact.

starmyskyz1 :

the lawsuit