2a_education :
I agree with you in principle, but this is why elections matter. Winning does not just mean controlling office for a term. It means gaining the power to shape institutions and create advantages that make your agenda more durable. That may feel unfair, but some amount of durability is a feature of the system, not a bug.
Stability is one of the main benefits. Our system is designed to change slowly, not lurch violently every time public opinion shifts. That friction gives voters, courts, states, and future elections time to stop bad decisions before they pass a point of no return. The party in power gets to govern, but it does not get unlimited power forever. If it overreaches, coalitions shift and voters can eventually reverse course. Madison’s argument in Federalist 51 was basically that ambition should be made to counteract ambition, meaning power should be checked by other power rather than trusted to pure virtue. In plain English, the system was built around the assumption that people in power will try to keep power, so the answer is not to pretend otherwise. The answer is to make sure other institutions, other factions, and ultimately voters can push back. The important limit is that it only lasts as long as voters continue to tolerate it. Gerrymandering can make political control more durable, but it does not make it permanent. States and districts have shifted from blue to red and back again over time because voter coalitions change, turnout changes, candidates change, and public opinion eventually catches up with parties that overreach.
2026-05-11 01:23:27