@micah_erfan: MAGA has a bit of a concerning pattern…

CONNORSUCKS :

I want to hear their argument

gamingshulker :

what else was in the bill

elijahwalker :

This was proposed by 2 republicans btw

Haroldeen :

I'd like to see what was actually in the bill they're voting against.

jdub :

What and the actual fuk!

Lokantus Obeer :

"but the context..."

Lerxst69 :

Wow

jackboback :

https://www.oklegislature.gov/cf_pdf/2025-26%20INT/SB/SB504%20INT.PDF

Zander :

Of course they voted no. Republicans will always vote against Democrats even if it's shit like this. I hate the two part system

arandomguywithsusaura :

35 republicans voted yes with the democrats. not all republicans are bad people

Reat :

So you’re own research just because you see something online doesn’t mean it’s true this is fake for those who don’t know

cathodicreaction :

say there's a 17 year old that has a child and the other party to the child making wants to marry before child is born, there's no provision to allow this now. that's actually one of the provisions struck down by sb504. some might say "good, they shouldn't be marrying that early" but there's also the part where they're about to be parents without being legally bound

3rdEyeWide :

God, I hope this is fake

Rachel X :

it’s not just Oklahoma- it was Republicans on Kansas, WV, NJ, TN, Iowa, etc too

Alisa :

So gross

Chris :

Wait so the republicans said no to the ban that would get rid of child marriage?

JordanSpeithFan177 :

Tuepeai Williams :

that needed a vote

Hardcore, godless communist :

Persuasive definition fallacy

Carl Allen17 :

@Turning Point USA

Trint1313 :

what else was in the bill I gaurentee like every bill that gets proposed there was some fucked thing they were try to slip by they always do and yes im talking about both sides

givemetheslab :

Look at these morons in the comments trying to defend the republicans. Ya really are a cult.