reigns did not need it. BRAY needed it. it should have been Bray that ended the streak
2026-05-20 17:23:01
14
thebeastandc :
Brock makes sense, Bray Wyatt makes sense, Roman Reigns kinda makes sense, Drew McIntyre makes sense. What edge said Brock was already a world beater so why not go for something so prestigious? Take a streak away. Bray Wyatt makes sense as it boosts his career and makes him look more dominant. Roman Reigns didn’t really need the boost as he was still in the shield at that time. The streak is a huge factor in the undertakers career so having the shield interfere would make zero sense and they just won the crowd over.
2026-06-06 16:32:10
1
robinwilliamsinjumanji :
Yeah I don’t understand how they thought having some new guy come in and beat undertaker who has defeated many legends in a row would have made sense. Imagine Undertaker losing his streak to someone like Sami Zayn.
2026-05-22 14:11:49
3
Timothy D Schmittens :
Should’ve retired 21-0.
2026-05-21 16:14:41
2
ManAmongGods :
I will always say they should've switched opponents with Brock and Bray. Bray vs taker and Cena vs Brock
2026-05-20 18:49:56
2
user9164550055544 :
Bray should have ended it or he should have drawn with Sting. Worst decision in Vince’s long line of bad decisions.
2026-05-20 18:47:22
5
Abe R. Poncho :
Bray would’ve been the new dead man/ streak starter would’ve allowed undertaker to pass the mantle and the story of sister Abigail
2026-05-20 18:10:38
5
D :
The idea these guys have to make someone who’s not established be the one to end the streak is hilariously garbage. Brock was the only one who made sense. Freak athlete, giant, REAL fighting UFC heavyweight champion, it had to be him
2026-05-21 08:44:05
1
Ringside Podcast :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-05-22 18:23:28
1
To see more videos from user @fightlegionn5, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.