@9iijl.s: #taşacakbudeniz #4u #eleni #avayaman

ســارة
ســارة
Open In TikTok:
Region: SA
Wednesday 20 May 2026 16:46:38 GMT
186708
19720
92
2343

Music

Download

Comments

To see more videos from user @9iijl.s, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

The XRP Ledger, the underlying blockchain for XRP (CRYPTO: XRP), has seen impressive growth, pulling in $2.2 billion in net inflows for tokenized commodities in 2026—surpassing Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH), which garnered $1.6 billion. Net inflows represent the value of assets entering a blockchain minus those leaving it. Yet despite this achievement, XRP’s price has kept falling. As of October 9, XRP is trading around $1.40, about 51% lower than a year ago and 62% below its $3.65 peak. By comparison, ETH has dropped about 44% over the same period. So, does outperforming Ethereum in tokenized commodities affect the XRP price, or does the ledger value remain disconnected from demand for the coin itself? The XRP Ledger’s $2.2 Billion Commodity Lead Relies on One Energy Token Tokenization involves creating a digital token that represents ownership of assets like bonds, shares, or commodity contracts. On the XRP Ledger, a significant portion of the $2.2 billion in commodity inflows comes from JMWH, a Justoken token representing electricity-generation contracts. As of October 7, JMWH accounted for roughly 89% of the ledger’s total commodity value. Interestingly, JMWH has only 165 holders, suggesting a small number of investors control most of its value. Earlier this year, just 19 wallets held JMWH, and the token showed no movement in May. Overall, the XRP Ledger’s performance looks strong, attracting $3.6 billion in real-world asset (RWA) inflows in 2026 (up to September 11), the highest of any blockchain. The monthly transfer volume for RWAs reached about $7 billion. However, the ledger’s strong numbers hinge on just a couple of tokens, particularly JMWH. Several companies, including Franklin Templeton (NYSE: BEN | BEN Price Prediction) and Ondo Finance, are utilizing the XRP Ledger to create tokenized funds. Notably, Ondo’s OUSG Treasury fund held approximately $188 million on the ledger as of October. However, issuers need only a small amount of XRP for account setup and transaction fees, so launching a fund on the ledger is separate from buying XRP in large quantities. Transaction fees are the only direct link between ledger activity and XRP demand. Every transaction on the XRP Ledger burns at least 0.00001 XRP in fees. For instance, one million transfers would burn about 10 XRP, valued at roughly $14 at the current price of $1.40, against a total supply of nearly 100 billion tokens. Ripple’s stablecoin, Ripple USD (RLUSD), is the ledger’s largest real-world asset, totaling about $1.2 billion. This stablecoin lets companies settle payments in dollars, so much of the ledger’s activity doesn’t require buying XRP. Price data indicates that the ledger’s growth has not translated into gains for XRP, which has lost about 51% of its value over the past year. In contrast, ETH has declined about 44%, despite being the second-largest tokenized commodity. Ethereum’s market value stands at about $306 billion, more than three times XRP’s $89 billion. Moreover, over the week leading up to October 9, XRP fell 8.4%, nearly matching ETH’s 8.6% decline. Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) also fell 4.1% during that time, suggesting that both XRP and ETH are influenced more by the broader crypto market than by their respective ledger’s tokenization figures. Does the XRP Ledger’s Win Over Ethereum Affect the XRP Price? In conclusion, while the XRP Ledger has outperformed Ethereum in tokenized commodities, this success has not increased XRP’s price. The $2.2 billion in commodity inflows is largely concentrated among JMWH’s 165 holders, and transaction fees from ledger activity burn only a small fraction of XRP. Additionally, XRP has declined more than ETH over the past year. For XRP holders, the challenge is clear: the ledger value may not directly reflect demand for XRP. Tokenization totals can rise even as XRP’s price falls. #xrp #ripple #xrpl #ethereum #eth
The XRP Ledger, the underlying blockchain for XRP (CRYPTO: XRP), has seen impressive growth, pulling in $2.2 billion in net inflows for tokenized commodities in 2026—surpassing Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH), which garnered $1.6 billion. Net inflows represent the value of assets entering a blockchain minus those leaving it. Yet despite this achievement, XRP’s price has kept falling. As of October 9, XRP is trading around $1.40, about 51% lower than a year ago and 62% below its $3.65 peak. By comparison, ETH has dropped about 44% over the same period. So, does outperforming Ethereum in tokenized commodities affect the XRP price, or does the ledger value remain disconnected from demand for the coin itself? The XRP Ledger’s $2.2 Billion Commodity Lead Relies on One Energy Token Tokenization involves creating a digital token that represents ownership of assets like bonds, shares, or commodity contracts. On the XRP Ledger, a significant portion of the $2.2 billion in commodity inflows comes from JMWH, a Justoken token representing electricity-generation contracts. As of October 7, JMWH accounted for roughly 89% of the ledger’s total commodity value. Interestingly, JMWH has only 165 holders, suggesting a small number of investors control most of its value. Earlier this year, just 19 wallets held JMWH, and the token showed no movement in May. Overall, the XRP Ledger’s performance looks strong, attracting $3.6 billion in real-world asset (RWA) inflows in 2026 (up to September 11), the highest of any blockchain. The monthly transfer volume for RWAs reached about $7 billion. However, the ledger’s strong numbers hinge on just a couple of tokens, particularly JMWH. Several companies, including Franklin Templeton (NYSE: BEN | BEN Price Prediction) and Ondo Finance, are utilizing the XRP Ledger to create tokenized funds. Notably, Ondo’s OUSG Treasury fund held approximately $188 million on the ledger as of October. However, issuers need only a small amount of XRP for account setup and transaction fees, so launching a fund on the ledger is separate from buying XRP in large quantities. Transaction fees are the only direct link between ledger activity and XRP demand. Every transaction on the XRP Ledger burns at least 0.00001 XRP in fees. For instance, one million transfers would burn about 10 XRP, valued at roughly $14 at the current price of $1.40, against a total supply of nearly 100 billion tokens. Ripple’s stablecoin, Ripple USD (RLUSD), is the ledger’s largest real-world asset, totaling about $1.2 billion. This stablecoin lets companies settle payments in dollars, so much of the ledger’s activity doesn’t require buying XRP. Price data indicates that the ledger’s growth has not translated into gains for XRP, which has lost about 51% of its value over the past year. In contrast, ETH has declined about 44%, despite being the second-largest tokenized commodity. Ethereum’s market value stands at about $306 billion, more than three times XRP’s $89 billion. Moreover, over the week leading up to October 9, XRP fell 8.4%, nearly matching ETH’s 8.6% decline. Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) also fell 4.1% during that time, suggesting that both XRP and ETH are influenced more by the broader crypto market than by their respective ledger’s tokenization figures. Does the XRP Ledger’s Win Over Ethereum Affect the XRP Price? In conclusion, while the XRP Ledger has outperformed Ethereum in tokenized commodities, this success has not increased XRP’s price. The $2.2 billion in commodity inflows is largely concentrated among JMWH’s 165 holders, and transaction fees from ledger activity burn only a small fraction of XRP. Additionally, XRP has declined more than ETH over the past year. For XRP holders, the challenge is clear: the ledger value may not directly reflect demand for XRP. Tokenization totals can rise even as XRP’s price falls. #xrp #ripple #xrpl #ethereum #eth

About