ReginaOnTheClock
Region: MX
Wednesday 03 June 2026 20:31:00 GMT
295186
7692
89
2109
Music
Download
Comments
Manu :
hay que afinar la voz para que no suene dormido jajaja
2026-06-04 23:58:01
238
Alejandro - Canta :
mi alarma suena solo 5 min antes de la call jajaja
2026-06-04 02:34:42
69
Raul Gil 🇨🇺 & 🇵🇾 :
asi mismo es, y luego a la cama a terminar ese sueñito
2026-06-04 23:23:08
63
MugenDramon93 :
Muy temprano siempre es mejor estar listo a las 8:99
2026-06-04 20:19:00
19
Liz :
con 3 min antes es mas que suficiente jajaja
2026-06-04 16:50:02
12
🐑✝️Peregrina🙋♀️💡 :
😂😂 La realidad
2026-06-05 20:08:04
0
Russell :
Simón jajja
2026-06-06 15:02:26
0
Matsuo :
Entro a las 9. La primera alarma: 8 (para ir agarrando señal) La segunda alarma: 8:30 (para reconfirmar por si apague la primera) La tercera 8:45 (para gozar lo de "5 minutitos más") La 100% real no fake: 8:55 (enciendo la pc, me lavo la cara y joya)
2026-06-06 19:33:07
12
Mar Gom :
Esa podría ser yo, pero tengo hijos... 🤣🤣
2026-06-06 01:25:25
7
Manlio Rolon :
si soy 😂😂😂
2026-06-09 15:41:51
0
ok.ok :
totalmente 😝
2026-06-05 23:40:50
0
AsistenteVirtual20 | Remoto💻 :
yo!
2026-06-11 00:08:50
0
Vanessa Rozo | Storytelling :
y sin cámara siempre que puedo 🤣
2026-06-04 18:42:40
11
Celia 🐎 :
confirmo
2026-06-06 02:22:54
0
Claudia Marcela Cepe :
Si somos
2026-06-04 20:28:53
0
NightStar ~ :
yo
2026-06-06 01:48:42
0
AnxelinaCatólica :
😂😂😂 si soy
2026-06-05 02:50:43
0
Deckforgetcg :
Confirmando 🤣🤣🤣
2026-06-04 18:26:54
0
Eli y Back :
Jajajajaja si; extraño eso
2026-06-04 20:55:30
0
Andiee Contreras💫 :
Soy sjjsjss
2026-06-04 05:01:47
0
anarkotierna :
Soi
2026-06-05 05:10:34
0
D-/2 :
Es lo peor tener reunión apenas comienza el día jajaja. Hay que afinar la voz lo más rápido posible para que no se note 😅
2026-06-29 14:15:09
1
John Doe and 753 others :
por qué tanto esfuerzo yo solo pongo la laptop sobre la otra almohada
2026-06-06 20:51:35
2
Gerard Gonzalez 🧤 :
El tráfico gatuno
2026-06-04 20:58:14
2
To see more videos from user @reginaontheclock, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.#truecrimecommunity #larp #viral #foryoupage #zeroday](/video/cover/7659525092380069128.webp)
