@courtneyjordan_esq: The federal government has a documented program that allows investigators to hide where evidence in your case actually came from. Your defense attorney will never see the original source. They have a name for it. It is called parallel construction. Here is how it works. Investigators identify a target using surveillance intelligence or a confidential source that cannot be disclosed in court. They then rebuild the investigation from a clean starting point. A traffic stop. A tip. A routine observation. The reconstructed investigation is what goes into your case file. That is what your attorney sees in discovery. The original source disappears from the record. In 2013 Reuters obtained DEA training documents through a public records request that described this process explicitly. I have been on the inside of a system where this was a known practice. I now defend people who never knew it was used against them. Your attorney cannot challenge what your attorney does not know exists. The specific questions to ask your attorney if you suspect parallel construction was used in your case will be inside The War Room. Link in bio. #ParallelConstruction #FederalInvestigation #HiddenEvidenceEconomy #FederalProsecutor #DEA
Fruit of the poisonous tree does apply if there is anything illegal involved in the initial discovery of a crime. But that depends on the defense uncovering the process used in the initial discovery. And that's where the courts are protecting the parallel construction, they have refused to make a ruling directly on the practice of parallel construction investigation. Instead they rule on 4th amendment criteria or chain of custody... etc.
2026-05-25 00:06:31
7
raysilvaNOLA :
Hopeless header !!! Brilliant!!!
2026-06-03 20:41:56
0
Wade7642 :
Fabrication! 🤔
2026-05-24 07:18:20
0
JennyLynn :
Of course they do and a good defense attorney will know this and why a good defense attorney will put a prosecutor on the stand.
2026-05-25 01:34:15
1
Dread Team Leader :
i was afraid that they might use that strategy
2026-05-30 03:34:50
1
yikes_thatwasrough :
Isn’t this attenuation, inevitability doctrine, or independent source doctrine? In ca anyways…
2026-06-01 20:07:12
0
0x4e4448 :
I guess the information can’t be authenticated.
2026-05-23 15:21:40
1
KyKy :
Is it not subject to Brady, Giglio, Napue, etc?
2026-05-23 16:40:52
0
glen69 :
hey it wasn't me man I was in a parallel universe at that time 😲
2026-05-23 21:47:12
1
elizabethgamagam1 :
That’s scary
2026-05-24 02:05:40
4
Dylan🔻 :
are there any tangible reforms that you see as possible that we could all push for?
2026-05-23 18:24:12
2
Ms. Demetrice Clayton❌ :
I need you as my attorney
2026-05-23 19:54:56
5
tomgocke :
discovery
2026-05-23 18:31:04
1
S.O.S.143,999 :
Those informations are not always accurate!
2026-05-24 04:20:50
2
grace.fan.984 :
That is so disturbing for law bidding citizens.🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
2026-05-23 18:40:01
1
dark nebula :
2 party diatorship
2026-05-23 19:45:03
1
Aifos :
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY AMAZING.......... 🌹
2026-05-23 19:33:08
3
FlipFlops & Caulk :
I love your content keep going!!!🥰🥰🥰🥰
2026-05-23 15:41:55
2
liberalsarecommunists :
legal doesn't mean right , lawful or just
2026-05-25 13:53:21
0
best4last2029 :
That’s just called fabricating evidence.
2026-05-26 00:05:43
0
francodemartino8 :
You are conflating issues. What ur describing is actually illegal from the perspective of an officer of the court especially when applying for warrants and or court orders.
2026-06-01 14:56:55
0
Hazel_Attorney :
That that’s why I love working at the Department of Justice
2026-05-25 14:00:17
0
rumanova8 :
No one can escape the law
2026-05-25 21:07:42
0
ElBuenote8654 :
isn't that considered hearsay?? I mean "someone told me you did something bad but I can't tell you who is it and you can never question him " wtf?
2026-05-25 09:39:25
0
To see more videos from user @courtneyjordan_esq, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.