1. Home
  2. Detail

@lordwerity: #обзор #oxide #креатор

perfect victory🪞
perfect victory🪞
Open In TikTok:
Region: BY
Monday 25 May 2026 11:08:59 GMT
1696
18
4
3

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.22MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (1.22MB) Watermark .mp4 (2.96MB) Music .mp3

Comments

666aeo1
Е.А :
бро я твой подпишик можешь мне в серв зайти и несколько штучек поставить 🙏
2026-05-25 12:15:08
0
To see more videos from user @lordwerity, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Sini Nyesigi (préparer l’avenir partie 07 la fin
Sini Nyesigi (préparer l’avenir partie 07 la fin
🤍#kesfet #sevgi #Love #N
🤍#kesfet #sevgi #Love #N
Экспонат 😈 #kasai #hinty #ttofine #so2 #standoff2
Экспонат 😈 #kasai #hinty #ttofine #so2 #standoff2
#standoff2 #стандофф2 #стандофф
#standoff2 #стандофф2 #стандофф
Nana patekar laughing Memes Templets video 🤣 Fanny laughing
Nana patekar laughing Memes Templets video 🤣 Fanny laughing
⚠️ A federal appeals court just ruled that privately possessing AI-generated child s*xual ab*se material at home can be protected by the First Amendment, as long as no real child is identified.This isn't okay. Here's the honest, full picture: The court (the Seventh Circuit) tossed one charge, home possession, citing Supreme Court precedent from 1969 and 2002. Producing this material, distributing it, and sending it to a minor are all still crimes, and in this case (US v. Anderegg) those charges are still moving forward. So it wasn't
⚠️ A federal appeals court just ruled that privately possessing AI-generated child s*xual ab*se material at home can be protected by the First Amendment, as long as no real child is identified.This isn't okay. Here's the honest, full picture: The court (the Seventh Circuit) tossed one charge, home possession, citing Supreme Court precedent from 1969 and 2002. Producing this material, distributing it, and sending it to a minor are all still crimes, and in this case (US v. Anderegg) those charges are still moving forward. So it wasn't "legalized." But here's why it's still wrong. The whole ruling rests on "no real child was involved." That premise is already breaking. These tools were trained on data scraped from the open web, and Stanford researchers found actual ab*se material inside the dataset behind the very tool used here. The judges themselves said the fake-versus-real line is collapsing and urged the Supreme Court to revisit it. 👀 The law is behind. Until it catches up, awareness is the protection. Share this so more people understand exactly what's allowed right now, and why it can't stay this way. 🙏 This is why CybersecureDad exists. Let's keep our kids safe online.

About

Legal