1. Home
  2. Detail

@ksushakazakevich: Обезболивающие при зубной боли #воспаление #зубнаяболь #стоматолог #боль #стоматит

ПРОВИЗОР || ЗДОРОВЬЕ
ПРОВИЗОР || ЗДОРОВЬЕ
Open In TikTok:
Region: BY
Tuesday 26 May 2026 16:30:30 GMT
53415
1306
37
236

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.94MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (2.22MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

user5834219444494
user5834219444494 :
Полная лажа. Ни один из этих препаратов мне не помог
2026-05-27 03:31:22
2
katiakorne
Katiakorne :
Нет зубов, нет проблем 😂
2026-05-26 19:03:20
11
odinokiivolk395
Карина светлова :
нет не помогает ибупрофен савсем динапар это супер обезбаливающее
2026-06-08 11:18:34
0
oksana_16079
oksana_16079 :
Кетанов.
2026-05-31 08:58:22
0
elenasaramud
Елена :
Немисулид
2026-05-28 18:15:52
2
zinaidakor61
zinaidakor61 :
Когда болит зуб то эти ваши препараты не как не помогут.
2026-06-10 20:02:29
0
user2506284574499
Ирина :
темпалгин👍👍👍
2026-05-27 05:30:59
0
valerio.ferrari12
Valerio.Ferrari. :
не одно не работает как кеторолак
2026-05-31 12:10:07
1
musicvithvova
лед и пламя :
я пил немесил
2026-05-27 08:27:46
0
user9755027792329
Джера :
напроксен больше подходит
2026-05-31 11:40:01
0
user9870461357441
ludmila :
Нимесулид
2026-05-27 14:09:55
0
lateskii
lateskii :
Кеторолак
2026-05-27 19:38:46
0
userlwzuamki0z
Dolce Vita :
пенталгин??
2026-05-27 12:33:26
0
user9829410723800
user9829410723800 :
налгезин лучше всех работает, проверено
2026-05-27 11:42:16
0
user6023301257971
user6023301257971 :
Спасибо! 🙏
2026-05-26 16:45:09
0
hudaybergan.maham7
Hudaybergan mahamedov :
для спины
2026-05-29 02:14:31
0
user6082552262561
Алексей-Лёха :
а самое лутш е с перечисленого какое?
2026-05-28 05:12:11
0
user43087021065094
User4308702106509 :
при зубной боли мне помогает Темпалгин: большие зелёные таблетки. другие мне не помогают
2026-06-10 20:36:40
0
user108534069650101
ваня :
Нимесулид девушка супер 👍 таблетки
2026-05-27 00:54:56
0
user1331775992424
user1331775992424 :
Реклама запрещённых как опасных препаратов в Германии? 😄
2026-05-26 19:11:41
0
alekskuparos
Алексей Гагарин :
при острой сильной боли только помог кетанов, остальное шляпа даже наметили слабовато
2026-05-29 20:28:14
0
nilufar.matnazaro
Nilufar Matnazarova :
лабдик.
2026-05-27 13:36:01
0
xuja.91
🦅𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐄𝐍𝐃𝐀🕋❤️🦅 :
👍👍👍
2026-05-28 20:19:00
0
user6023301257971
user6023301257971 :
👌👌👌
2026-05-26 16:44:31
0
To see more videos from user @ksushakazakevich, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

🩵.#تخمطين_اعتبرج_فانزه_الي💆🏻‍♀️ #فرقان
🩵.#تخمطين_اعتبرج_فانزه_الي💆🏻‍♀️ #فرقان
دعاء يوم الجمعة | اللَّهُمَّ فِي يَوْمِ الجُمُعَةِ #دعاء_يوم_الجمعه #ليلة_الجمعة #دعاء #الجمعة #ماهرالمعيقلي
دعاء يوم الجمعة | اللَّهُمَّ فِي يَوْمِ الجُمُعَةِ #دعاء_يوم_الجمعه #ليلة_الجمعة #دعاء #الجمعة #ماهرالمعيقلي
just a man going to pray❤️ Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound in the answer to a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes' number, which is itself much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming each digit occupies a Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be so large that its digital representation could not be represented in the observable universe. Not even the number of digits of that number, and so on, repeated a number of times that vastly exceeds the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical power towers on the scale of the universe of the form: a^(b^(c^(...))) although Graham's number is in fact a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or an equivalent notation, as was done by Ronald Graham, after whom the number is named. Since there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, whose sequence grows faster than any computable sequence. Although far too large to be computed in full, the digit sequence of Graham's number can be calculated explicitly through simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are 2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g₆₄, where: g₁ = 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 gₙ = 3 ↑^(gₙ₋₁) 3, for n ≥ 2 Graham's number was used by Ronald Graham in conversations with the popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever used in a published mathematical proof. The number was featured in the 1980 edition of the Guinness Book of World Records, increasing public interest in it. Since then, other specific integers known to be much larger than Graham's number (such as TREE(3)) have appeared in serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with various finite forms of Harvey Friedman's version of Kruskal's theorem. Furthermore, smaller upper bounds have since been proven valid for the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was originally derived.#tcc #Love #51 #capcut
just a man going to pray❤️ Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound in the answer to a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes' number, which is itself much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming each digit occupies a Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be so large that its digital representation could not be represented in the observable universe. Not even the number of digits of that number, and so on, repeated a number of times that vastly exceeds the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical power towers on the scale of the universe of the form: a^(b^(c^(...))) although Graham's number is in fact a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or an equivalent notation, as was done by Ronald Graham, after whom the number is named. Since there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, whose sequence grows faster than any computable sequence. Although far too large to be computed in full, the digit sequence of Graham's number can be calculated explicitly through simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are 2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g₆₄, where: g₁ = 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 gₙ = 3 ↑^(gₙ₋₁) 3, for n ≥ 2 Graham's number was used by Ronald Graham in conversations with the popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever used in a published mathematical proof. The number was featured in the 1980 edition of the Guinness Book of World Records, increasing public interest in it. Since then, other specific integers known to be much larger than Graham's number (such as TREE(3)) have appeared in serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with various finite forms of Harvey Friedman's version of Kruskal's theorem. Furthermore, smaller upper bounds have since been proven valid for the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was originally derived.#tcc #Love #51 #capcut
Lelo nde lelo #evoloko #RDC #liege #congo #fifaworldcup
Lelo nde lelo #evoloko #RDC #liege #congo #fifaworldcup
don't forget about me #teenwolf #teenwolfedit #teenwolfedits
don't forget about me #teenwolf #teenwolfedit #teenwolfedits
المرأءه تعشق الرجل القوي بالطريقة الصحيحة . القوة ليست تسلطاً او استبداداً او عنفً . القوي بالحماية، والإنفاق، والمسؤلية والقيادة الرشيدة التي تحفظ التوازن . القوي بالعطاء والاهتمام والتفاهم والإحترام . مرجع المرأءه دايماً للرجل القوي ، القادر على احتواءها وتحمل مسؤليتها . #اكسبلورexplore #foryou #fypシ #foryoupage #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp
المرأءه تعشق الرجل القوي بالطريقة الصحيحة . القوة ليست تسلطاً او استبداداً او عنفً . القوي بالحماية، والإنفاق، والمسؤلية والقيادة الرشيدة التي تحفظ التوازن . القوي بالعطاء والاهتمام والتفاهم والإحترام . مرجع المرأءه دايماً للرجل القوي ، القادر على احتواءها وتحمل مسؤليتها . #اكسبلورexplore #foryou #fypシ #foryoupage #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp

About

Legal