@noname321403: Bro is not michael scofield #побег #edit #prisonbreak #michaelscofield #razj

©️8055𝕽𝖆𝖟𝕵
©️8055𝕽𝖆𝖟𝕵
Open In TikTok:
Region: KZ
Wednesday 27 May 2026 04:31:56 GMT
2855
108
8
42

Music

Download

Comments

nationalist_86
alash :
(тату ішіндегі бірде біреуі келген жоқ)
2026-05-27 08:30:12
2
To see more videos from user @noname321403, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


Based on reports surrounding today's Blue Ribbon hearing, these are the strongest allegations raised by the group of 18 former Marines and military personnel. It is important to note that these are allegations under investigation and not proven facts. � Philstar.com +1 1. The ₱805-Billion Kickback Allegation This is the biggest and most explosive claim. The witnesses allege that kickbacks from flood control projects nationwide reached around ₱805 billion, and that they participated in transporting portions of this money. According to them, the cash was allegedly moved in suitcases and bags through land, sea, and air routes. � Philstar.com +2 Why it matters: If true, it would be one of the largest corruption scandals in Philippine history. Challenge: Critics, including Panfilo Lacson, have questioned the logistics, arguing that physically moving ₱805 billion in cash would require enormous weight and volume. � POLITIKO - News Philippine Politics 2. The "Maleta ng Pera" Delivery Operations The former Marines claim that cash was packed into suitcases, including luxury luggage, and delivered to designated recipients. This allegation is powerful because it describes a specific method rather than a vague accusation. The witnesses claim they acted as couriers and security personnel during these deliveries. � POLITIKO - News Philippine Politics 3. Direct Naming of High-Ranking Officials The witnesses allegedly identified several powerful political figures as recipients or beneficiaries of the money. Among the names repeatedly mentioned in reports are Martin Romualdez, Zaldy Co, and even Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and members of his family. All of these personalities have either denied wrongdoing or have not been found guilty of any offense related to the allegations. � POLITIKO - News Philippine Politics Why this is significant: The allegations are not against low-level officials but against individuals at the highest levels of government. 4. The Claimed ₱48-Million Delivery One witness, former Marine Orly Guteza, previously testified under oath that he personally delivered approximately ₱48 million hidden inside suitcases to locations allegedly linked to certain political figures. � POLITIKO - News Philippine Politics Why investigators focus on this: Unlike the broader ₱805-billion claim, this allegation involves a specific amount, specific deliveries, and a specific witness. 5. Multiple Witnesses Corroborating the Same Story The appearance of 18 former military personnel is significant because investigators will look for whether their accounts match on: Dates Locations Delivery methods Names of handlers Amounts involved If their testimonies independently align on key details, that could strengthen the credibility of the allegations. If there are major inconsistencies, it could weaken the case. � Philstar.com +1 What Could Make or Break the Allegations? The hearing's next phase will likely focus on evidence beyond testimony: Flight records Vehicle logs Photos or videos Phone communications Bank records Witness corroboration from non-military sources Physical evidence linking specific deliveries to specific recipients At this point, the strongest allegation politically is the claim that a network of former military personnel was used to move flood-control kickbacks hidden in suitcases to high-ranking officials. The strongest allegation evidentially is the more specific claim involving identified deliveries and amounts, because those are potentially verifiable through records and witnesses. � POLITIKO - News Philippine Politics +1 #TIKTOK #VIRAL #philippines #TRENDING #BREAKINGNEWS

About