@systemswithscotty: I can’t take it anymore 🤮 #healthcare #crowdhealthpartner #crowdhealth

systemswithscotty

Open In TikTok:

Region: US

Thursday 28 May 2026 04:30:54 GMT

944

83

27

2

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (6.58MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (2.8MB) Watermark .mp4 (5.94MB) Music .mp3

Comments

xxCourtneyLeigh :

As a type one diabetic, insurance likes to try to decide how much insulin that I need to survive. They have tried to limit me to 15 units a day before.

2026-05-28 05:02:12

4

Walter in Vermont :

“Deny, Delay, Defend” -HealthCorp CEO

2026-05-28 10:10:53

4

sunshinegirl84 :

Because we've let the for profit model into our healthcare system. Crowdhealth is not the way, replace the current system with universal Healthcare AND expand residency spots and grants for med school!

2026-05-29 00:46:28

3

stephlikesu :

It’s not even the insurance companies anymore they outsource to get rid of liability, they’re called “pharmacy benefit managers” they set formularies that require patients to try the cheapest option drugs first, and if a drug is too new or too expensive there will literally just be a “block” on that medication entirely, I highly recommend looking into your states rules on an “insurance external review” but first her doctor will have to submit an “appeal” for the specific medication citing “medically necessity” if that doesn’t work the patient can file an insurance external review usually it’ll get pushed through then bear if they deny it without good cause you can sue them (again this is dependent of what state you live in)

2026-05-28 05:05:29

2

2ShaiBeautyCo :

Yeah, my insurance denied my autistic son for AAC speech device. Is completely nonverbal and uses a device for him. Our insurance is what it is not considered a medical equipment. It’s only his voice.

2026-05-28 05:12:28

2

JICE :

She can still get the prescription using coupons like GoodRX. This is why I no longer pay for insurance, I am self pay and pay for prescriptions with GoodRX and sometimes CVS is even cheaper than most coupons. Even when I had insurance and the deduction is so high for meds, I used coupons

2026-05-28 05:24:12

2

Point Beach Poodles+Doodles :

Ya it does. They don’t want to spend money. They will take it but not give it.

2026-05-28 04:59:33

1

Nic :

capitalism

2026-05-28 12:15:47

1

Bravolover2024 :

Let me tell you I went off on my insurance company in 2024 because they denied a medication that it’s not life or death by no means but if a man has low testosterone, it can affect their heart. My doctor felt two doctors actually I need testosterone. My insurance company was like no we’re not. We’re not doing this so when I called I spoke to just a customer service representative that we were in around and around and I finally snapped and said so let me get this straight. I have two doctors that both tell me I need this medication to give myself a better quality of life I said and I pay a lot of money every month for this healthcare and I have a non-doctor and a non-pharmacist telling me that I can’t get this drug covered through my insurance.

2026-05-29 00:34:38

1

Tom031 :

health insurance are stock market corporations which a share profit first and foremost

2026-06-01 11:44:54

1

To see more videos from user @systemswithscotty, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

daily affirmations #khhv #aura #fyp #viral #tlpur Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers such as Skewes's number and Moser's number, both of which are in turn much, much larger than a googolplex. As with these, it is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain an ordinary digital representation of Graham's number, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume, possibly the smallest measurable space. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form abc⋅⋅⋅ , even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g64 Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.

daily affirmations #khhv #aura #fyp #viral #tlpur Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers such as Skewes's number and Moser's number, both of which are in turn much, much larger than a googolplex. As with these, it is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain an ordinary digital representation of Graham's number, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume, possibly the smallest measurable space. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form abc⋅⋅⋅ , even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g64 Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.

Cheb Bouaa Feat Lydia La La La - 2009 #song #music #foryou #fyp#vibes

Cheb Bouaa Feat Lydia La La La - 2009 #song #music #foryou #fyp#vibes

Yo este año elijo “CREER”. 🐙 El increíble Pulpo Paul – El oráculo del Mundial 2010 ⚽ En este video recordamos la historia del famoso Pulpo Paul, el animal que sorprendió al mundo durante el Mundial de 2010 con sus predicciones de partidos. Desde su acuario en Alemania, Paul eligió correctamente varios resultados, convirtiéndose en un fenómeno mundial y una de las historias más curiosas del fútbol. ¿Fue suerte, coincidencia o algo más? Descubre cómo este pulpo pasó a la historia del deporte. #PulpoPaul #Mundial2010 #Fútbol #PaulTheOctopus #HistoriaDelFútbol

Yo este año elijo “CREER”. 🐙 El increíble Pulpo Paul – El oráculo del Mundial 2010 ⚽ En este video recordamos la historia del famoso Pulpo Paul, el animal que sorprendió al mundo durante el Mundial de 2010 con sus predicciones de partidos. Desde su acuario en Alemania, Paul eligió correctamente varios resultados, convirtiéndose en un fenómeno mundial y una de las historias más curiosas del fútbol. ¿Fue suerte, coincidencia o algo más? Descubre cómo este pulpo pasó a la historia del deporte. #PulpoPaul #Mundial2010 #Fútbol #PaulTheOctopus #HistoriaDelFútbol

Promesa cumplida ✅

Promesa cumplida ✅

#semuaorang

#CapCut #your_coffee #هواجيس #اكسبلور #الوائلي

#CapCut #your_coffee #هواجيس #اكسبلور #الوائلي

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy