@savefiona: #catsoftiktok #foryoupage

save Fiona

Open In TikTok:

Region: UG

Thursday 28 May 2026 08:57:00 GMT

751

158

16

43

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.46MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0.47MB) Watermark .mp4 (1.2MB) Music .mp3

Comments

🎀🐈‍⬛ :

Hi

2026-05-28 09:00:02

4

user80600181896 :

@.letmelovey: Love Fiona. Save Fiona. Did you know that Tik tok pays every 9 words and one dot??? Let’s help this girls car . 💖💖

2026-05-28 12:36:23

1

Jakob Čurin :

hi

2026-05-28 09:00:33

2

aurora :

hiiii❤️❤️❤️

2026-05-28 09:02:53

4

𝐣𝐚𝐲𝐝𝐞𝐧🪽 :

hiii

2026-05-28 09:00:32

3

betta :

❤️❤️❤️vbv V

2026-05-28 12:57:56

0

lucas :

upp

2026-05-28 10:16:02

1

🎀🐈‍⬛ :

Hey

2026-05-28 09:00:05

3

Tsuki :

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSxqam5au/

2026-05-28 08:59:54

3

A :

🌹🌹🌹

2026-05-28 10:24:33

0

skaeongans-sang :

🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀

2026-05-28 09:15:04

0

asi7074 :

.

2026-05-28 09:10:17

0

jaeda :

😻😻😻

2026-05-28 09:03:46

0

reeceperry2 :

🥰🥰🥰

2026-05-28 09:01:32

0

🇹🇩 maya_2000 🇹🇩 :

🥰🥰🥰

2026-05-28 15:05:44

0

To see more videos from user @savefiona, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

#Fitness #GymTok #fitnessprogress #fitnessmotivation #gymmotivation

#Fitness #GymTok #fitnessprogress #fitnessmotivation #gymmotivation

#fyp #پشتون_تاجیک_هزاره_ازبک_زنده_باد🇦🇫 #afghanistan🇦🇫 #afghan #viral 💔

#fyp #پشتون_تاجیک_هزاره_ازبک_زنده_باد🇦🇫 #afghanistan🇦🇫 #afghan #viral 💔

Nami island miss u #korea

Nami island miss u #korea

The judge in the wrongful death lawsuit against Karen Read told the attorneys to familiarize themselves with conduct rules regarding publicity after confidential information about former Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor was shared online. Judge Mark Gildea spoke for about 12 minutes today at a hearing he scheduled after he learned someone shared the information on the social media website X 30 minutes after it was emailed to counsel on June 8. Everyone denied sharing the information, but Glidea said he knows it happened and urged the lawyers to act with integrity. He also told them to familiarize themselves with Rule 3.6 of the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct. “The rule sets forth a basic general prohibition against a lawyer's making statements that the lawyer knows or should know would have will have a substantial likelihood on materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding. The rule applies to lawyers who are or have been involved in the investigation or litigation of a case and their associates,” said Gildea, who presides in Plymouth County Superior Court. Gildea said the rule notes the difficulty of balancing “protecting the right to a fair trial and safeguarding the right of free expression.” “However, preserving the right to a fair trial for everyone necessarily entail some contaminant of information that may be disseminated prior to trial, especially where trial by jury is involved. If there were no such limits, the result would be the practical nullification of the protective effect of the rules of forensic decorum and the exclusionary rules of evidence,” the judge said. He said the rule considers the public’s “legitimate interest in the conduct of judicial proceedings, particularly in matters of general public concern.” “However, I'm not so sure that churning the waters to generate social media coverage necessarily can result in a legitimate interest in the conduct of judicial proceedings,” Gildea said. The judge reminded lawyers of “the quiet expectation of fairness that we have as citizens.” “Such expectation is based on the framework the founders of our country built 250 years ago and trusted future generations to maintain,” Gildea said. “Counsel, do your part to maintain the quiet expectation of fairness. Do not succumb to the attraction of seeking to influence this case through social media.” He told the lawyers to “be what a trial lawyer should be, one that tries their case in the courtroom, and remember the provisions of General Laws, Chapter 221, Section 28, relative to the oath of office for an attorney in Massachusetts.” He said the rules says “I solemnly swear that I will do no falsehood, I will delay no man for lucre or malice, but I will conduct myself in the office of an attorney within the courts, according to the best of my knowledge and discretion, and with all good fidelity, as well to the courts as my clients. So help me God.” The next hearing is scheduled for July 10. #law #court

The judge in the wrongful death lawsuit against Karen Read told the attorneys to familiarize themselves with conduct rules regarding publicity after confidential information about former Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor was shared online. Judge Mark Gildea spoke for about 12 minutes today at a hearing he scheduled after he learned someone shared the information on the social media website X 30 minutes after it was emailed to counsel on June 8. Everyone denied sharing the information, but Glidea said he knows it happened and urged the lawyers to act with integrity. He also told them to familiarize themselves with Rule 3.6 of the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct. “The rule sets forth a basic general prohibition against a lawyer's making statements that the lawyer knows or should know would have will have a substantial likelihood on materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding. The rule applies to lawyers who are or have been involved in the investigation or litigation of a case and their associates,” said Gildea, who presides in Plymouth County Superior Court. Gildea said the rule notes the difficulty of balancing “protecting the right to a fair trial and safeguarding the right of free expression.” “However, preserving the right to a fair trial for everyone necessarily entail some contaminant of information that may be disseminated prior to trial, especially where trial by jury is involved. If there were no such limits, the result would be the practical nullification of the protective effect of the rules of forensic decorum and the exclusionary rules of evidence,” the judge said. He said the rule considers the public’s “legitimate interest in the conduct of judicial proceedings, particularly in matters of general public concern.” “However, I'm not so sure that churning the waters to generate social media coverage necessarily can result in a legitimate interest in the conduct of judicial proceedings,” Gildea said. The judge reminded lawyers of “the quiet expectation of fairness that we have as citizens.” “Such expectation is based on the framework the founders of our country built 250 years ago and trusted future generations to maintain,” Gildea said. “Counsel, do your part to maintain the quiet expectation of fairness. Do not succumb to the attraction of seeking to influence this case through social media.” He told the lawyers to “be what a trial lawyer should be, one that tries their case in the courtroom, and remember the provisions of General Laws, Chapter 221, Section 28, relative to the oath of office for an attorney in Massachusetts.” He said the rules says “I solemnly swear that I will do no falsehood, I will delay no man for lucre or malice, but I will conduct myself in the office of an attorney within the courts, according to the best of my knowledge and discretion, and with all good fidelity, as well to the courts as my clients. So help me God.” The next hearing is scheduled for July 10. #law #court

#lips #eyes #trend #prtoi

#lips #eyes #trend #prtoi

QUE SAUDADE♥️@Família Cacau Haxkar Oficial

QUE SAUDADE♥️@Família Cacau Haxkar Oficial

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy