@assiut_sarcasm: #كوكب_المعنجرين ❤💪 #متابعه #لكي_نستمر_في_نشر_المزيد_إن_شاء_الله #صعيدي #اسيوط_سوهاج_قنا_الاقصر_اسوان_المنيا

Assiut sarcasm society
Assiut sarcasm society
Open In TikTok:
Region: EG
Thursday 28 May 2026 22:06:58 GMT
9828
114
4
153

Music

Download

Comments

user1943482328694
حـسـام :
تحيتي لك 🥀🥀🥀
2026-05-29 17:58:34
1
user9930888318163
السلطان محمود الاول :
مهجه
2026-05-31 10:34:56
0
omarafandy41
𒆜الديـب :
😂😂😂
2026-06-14 13:21:02
1
dyk04iwb6t4q
خالد ناصر ⚖️🕊 :
@محمد احمد
2026-06-17 18:08:45
1
To see more videos from user @assiut_sarcasm, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

An example of the SCRC Classification Engine (TNA & TNA’) What is SCRC? The Superficial Cephalometric Relations of Craniofacial (SCRC) system is the analytical framework  developed to evaluate how craniofacial structures are positioned, oriented, rotated, and proportioned relative to one another using externally visible landmarks rather than radiographic imaging. SCRC vs. Facial Harmony: Most facial harmony systems are outcome-based because they start with a visual characteristic (ratio/angle) & attempt to quantify how closely it is with an “ideal” range. The only problem is when people begin treating those outputs as explanations rather than observations. A facial harmony system may identify that a particular facial third is elongated. It may identify that the lower face occupies a larger proportion of total facial height than expected. It may identify a midface ratio that falls outside a preferred range. But the mathematics itself generally stops there. The system has quantified the outcome without necessarily explaining the structural pathway that produced it.  The SCRC approaches the problem differently. Rather than focusing primarily on proportional outcomes, it focuses on relationships between structures. Most of its measurements are not designed to function independently. They are designed to interact. A TNA measurement has meaning, but its meaning changes once it is viewed alongside TNA', ANB', TNB', facial angle, mandibular plane orientation, and vertical distributions. The measurement itself is rarely the endpoint.  This relationship-based approach was heavily influenced by traditional cephalometric analysis with orthodontic diagnosis historically relying on evaluating how skeletal, dental, and soft tissue structures relate to one another rather than relying on individual measurements in isolation. Systems such as the Steiner, Downs, and Ricketts analyses all operate on this principle. The important finding is often not the angle itself, but how multiple measurements agree, contradict, reinforce, or compensate for one another.  ##face##looksmax##Science
An example of the SCRC Classification Engine (TNA & TNA’) What is SCRC? The Superficial Cephalometric Relations of Craniofacial (SCRC) system is the analytical framework developed to evaluate how craniofacial structures are positioned, oriented, rotated, and proportioned relative to one another using externally visible landmarks rather than radiographic imaging. SCRC vs. Facial Harmony: Most facial harmony systems are outcome-based because they start with a visual characteristic (ratio/angle) & attempt to quantify how closely it is with an “ideal” range. The only problem is when people begin treating those outputs as explanations rather than observations. A facial harmony system may identify that a particular facial third is elongated. It may identify that the lower face occupies a larger proportion of total facial height than expected. It may identify a midface ratio that falls outside a preferred range. But the mathematics itself generally stops there. The system has quantified the outcome without necessarily explaining the structural pathway that produced it. The SCRC approaches the problem differently. Rather than focusing primarily on proportional outcomes, it focuses on relationships between structures. Most of its measurements are not designed to function independently. They are designed to interact. A TNA measurement has meaning, but its meaning changes once it is viewed alongside TNA', ANB', TNB', facial angle, mandibular plane orientation, and vertical distributions. The measurement itself is rarely the endpoint. This relationship-based approach was heavily influenced by traditional cephalometric analysis with orthodontic diagnosis historically relying on evaluating how skeletal, dental, and soft tissue structures relate to one another rather than relying on individual measurements in isolation. Systems such as the Steiner, Downs, and Ricketts analyses all operate on this principle. The important finding is often not the angle itself, but how multiple measurements agree, contradict, reinforce, or compensate for one another. ##face##looksmax##Science

About