Zaya
Region: US
Thursday 28 May 2026 23:16:27 GMT
569047
68951
890
711
Music
Download
Comments
ཀ sven `` ˖ :
she should change her name to pattie goonia
2026-08-04 09:34:39
0
💢 :
Here diva I fixed your pfp
2026-05-29 08:56:39
9164
palegreencircle :
Patagonia is a geographic region in South America! You can't trademark a geographic region!!
2026-05-28 23:32:15
7604
BRADY :
Mind you Mattel (the toy brand) and Trixie Mattel are still co-existing perfectly fine
2026-05-29 15:09:40
2654
Zaya :
Tired of greedy corporations 😭
2026-05-28 23:17:23
3871
Taylor Rose Liles :
I disagree- Patagonia was extremely respectful and supportive of Patti Gonia in their communications (from the court documents), but made it clear that Patti can not use Patagonia’s logo or block white lettering when selling/promoting merchandise. If Patagonia DOESNT sue to protect their trademark, they lose it. The Jan Sport situation you mentioned was a collab- but if Jan Sport trademarked Jan Sport in the athletic/outdoors industry, that would be infringement. When she sells merch, she sells it under her “Jan” trademark. The same way Trixie Mattel sells items under her “Trixie” trademark, because using the Mattel name to sell toys/trinkets would be infringement. I’d recommend reading the court docs for more context!
2026-05-30 19:16:05
204
eleanor 🌷🦢🪽🌈 :
All these comments are sooo misinformed about the terms of the lawsuit, and what Pattie actually did, which was directly go against the agreement that she had with Patagonia: that they were cool with her doing her thing unless she made merch with their logo/similar to their logo, which she did. That’s just basic trademark law y’all, they have to protect their brand and have tried to communicate with her so it didn’t come to having to sue. They’re also suing for $1 which shows that they’re not just after money. The legal fees part is unfortunate, but she did directly go against the agreement they had, so it could have been avoided if she hadn’t infringed on their agreement. Doesn’t seem like they want to sue at all, but trademark law says they have to affirmatively protect their brand against anyone and everyone who infringes upon it, they cannot pick and choose who to sue. Seems like they tried to deescalate it first, and Pattie didn’t back down. Please watch actual lawyers’ videos about this topic instead of allowing Pattie to win the court of public opinion like she’s attempting to do, because she knows she is not going to win this lawsuit.
2026-05-30 02:28:16
572
saturn 🪐💫 :
Trademark law protects all companies, small or big. I don’t like defending big companies but they’re well within their right to sue her. She used a very similar name, likeness and branding within the exact same nice. If Jan sport started selling backpacks with ‘Jan *space* Sport’ she almost def would’ve gotten sued. But she never attempted to, which is why she never got sued. Pattie started selling merch with the exact same color scheme and likeness as Patagonia. Trademarks are meant to protect small businesses. If this one was allowed to happen, they all would
2026-05-30 15:11:56
84
KyleDaRealest :
Its giving the whole Lexi Love situation
2026-05-28 23:31:50
593
thesonofthesteppe :
Patagonia (the land) should sue Patagonia (the company)
2026-05-29 11:32:51
1046
LANDYN :
They aren’t suing Patagonia because of her name they are suing because Pattie filed a trademark for clothing under the climate activism space which Patagonia already owns so yes Pattie would be hurting their brand and infringing on their trademark
2026-05-30 09:20:49
49
Zack :
Pattie literally used their logo on one of her merch stickers, yall will believe anything. Love Pattie but she did mess up.
2026-05-29 06:25:29
54
Tomatoplaydo :
I feel like yall are intentionally misunderstanding the situation
2026-06-01 18:19:16
120
⚛️Kai Kai⚛️ :
Why are corporations so dumb?
2026-05-28 23:22:00
119
vistarilvoid :
I love what Pattie stands for, but this whole situation feels like a preventable IP mess. Patagonia is doing what big brands always do with trademarks: if they don’t enforce, they risk losing strength later. Pattie’s team seems to have treated this more like playful homage than a serious legal line, and then doubled down with a trademark move that gave Patagonia the perfect opening to act. I can support the advocacy and still think the strategy here was not thought through.
2026-05-29 07:13:51
90
Lorrispriv :
Are yall ok? Most companies do this….if it’s already trademarked then you’ll get sued, that’s how trademarks work
2026-05-30 01:05:34
9
marchatepage.com :
if Mattel can share their name with Trixie, why can't they?
2026-05-29 21:12:41
9
𝐽𝑜𝑐𝑦 𝐺𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑒 :
Did i know who Pattie was before this? No. Will I support her now and ignore the Patagonia brand? Absolutely yes
2026-05-28 23:41:38
177
Lan :
Like does the brand not know this?
2026-05-29 08:36:01
162
🔻🍉Koriand’r Tamaran🍉🔻 :
The “trademark” isn’t even something she’s SELLING, it’s a single sticker you get as a reward for DONATING
2026-05-29 06:51:11
147
DustinDoesPoker :
Reminder: This has NOTHING to do with her name. NOTHING.
2026-06-01 05:17:24
37
periodperiod85 :
People making minute long videos blabbering about literally nothing, with NO valid points, is so frustrating.
2026-05-30 14:44:43
11
To see more videos from user @zayaperysian, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
