The Murder Men Podcast
Region: US
Sunday 31 May 2026 20:25:12 GMT
215111
2510
249
49
Music
Download
Comments
Nate Be Fishin :
Danny Masterson? the dude from That 70s Show?
2026-06-01 12:00:45
3
dmoney23free :
Charging people retroactively based on statute of limitations is a slippery slope slope
2026-06-01 03:59:58
105
qqq1701 :
I've never understood statute of limitations. if you committed a crime you committed a crime. why do you get it for free if you don't get caught for a certain amount of time?
2026-06-01 15:29:26
29
❌Rambo’s Dad❌ :
Are you defending him?
2026-06-01 01:41:01
43
UNONUMUS :
did the prosecutor have physical evidence??? or did they convict based on personal testimony?
2026-06-01 09:55:09
49
Greeneyes :
Why would you have an issue with that?
2026-06-01 02:28:08
13
JOEY SPOCK :
Don't you love how these guys who are previous criminals, say he's a scumbag and danny masterson deserves to be locked up which they have to say because they will lose viewers.. but they don't agree with him being locked up because of the new statute of limitations laws. They say that because then maybe laws can be created that can get get rid of limitations on laws THEY broke.
2026-06-01 09:02:07
3
jayhawks88 :
but the weed laws aren't retroactive
2026-06-01 06:59:58
16
gravystix :
I dont have a problem with extending thr statute of limitations for crimes, specially serious ones...but charges and convictions have to be based off of strong evidence like you had a DNA sample and years down the road a match shows up in a criminal database. it cant just be witness testimony or something that is flimsy and would only get less accurate over time
2026-06-01 14:21:33
15
I'm a gopher :
It is insane, I'm never stepping foot in California. Im pretty boring and don't really do much but it's not worth the risk
2026-06-01 13:44:00
5
Alex :
That’s crazy it’s retroactive.
2026-06-02 03:06:08
0
Alexander Gudajtes :
I don't hate the change to the law but I think the statue of limitations should still apply to those crimes that happened prior to the new change in 2017 that had exceeded the statue of limitations like if statue of limitations is 15 years then any crime that happened longer than 15 years prior to 2017 should still apply but any crime that has not reached the statue of limitations but occurred prior to 2017 shouldn't apply the statue of limitations. I think that's a fair way to make that work
2026-06-01 17:33:11
1
Constitution101_bkup :
No legislation can be passed and make it retroactive. See Article 1 section 9 clause 3. No expost facto laws. He can appeal it and win on constitutional grounds. I would move it to federal court first.
2026-06-02 09:03:41
1
Dalton :
its b.s plain n simple
2026-06-01 20:36:21
2
Gman2133 :
Most state standards give the victim 10 years after the 18th birthday to make a complaint
2026-06-01 06:31:24
0
Mr Church415 :
he was convicted in the court of public opinion long before he ever went to trial for anything.
2026-06-01 18:34:34
7
jeffreylapointe0 :
No proof either
2026-06-12 02:11:23
2
BrandonChill :
idk, California law that statute of limitations don't apply to crimes that may carry a life sentence seems to date back to theblate 1800s
2026-06-01 11:43:43
1
Slo :
Changing a law and making it retroactive is pretty nuts.
2026-06-11 01:37:06
5
autologousdm :
it's bs
2026-06-01 11:57:20
2
James P Retornyo :
What have you done?
2026-06-02 05:45:38
0
kendalkearsley :
Is this fake?
2026-06-15 14:59:23
0
thewhitephoenix96 :
Are you aware his lawyer also didn’t do their job defending him like a lawyer is supposed to do when hired
2026-06-05 02:15:14
0
Aaron Arnfield :
Not many countries have a state of limitation except for minor crimes, I think they are called “misdemeanor offenders” in America
2026-06-11 10:25:38
0
The_ChiWeeknd :
Is this satire?
2026-06-13 19:10:54
0
To see more videos from user @murdermenpod, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
