karl :
👽 A simple way to evaluate claims of “channeling” is to look at language.👽
If someone truly believes they are channeling information from an external intelligence—something beyond their own mind—then the words, ideas, and expressions they produce are not originating from them. They are, by definition, coming from another entity.
If we accept that premise, then that entity should not be limited by the human channeler’s personal knowledge or linguistic ability. An advanced intelligence—especially one described as extraterrestrial—would presumably have no restriction to a single human language. It could communicate in any language, multiple languages, or even in entirely novel forms of expression.
If a supposed channeler can only deliver messages in the language they already know—most often English—and only to people who understand that same language, that strongly suggests the source of the message is not external. An advanced, non-human intelligence would not be limited by one person’s vocabulary or language. This limitation alone raises serious doubts about the authenticity of the claim and points to the information being generated internally rather than coming from an independent entity. —- With that said, all those people claiming to be channelers, are frauds. Imagine an “alien” being interrupted in the middle of his channeling session by a Hispanic man, asking him to please tell him what he’s saying in Spanish, because he really doesn’t understand English — then to have the alien turn to him and say “No Speaki Spanish”
2026-06-04 18:09:22