𝕭𝖔𝖈𝖎𝖑 𝐤𝖊𝖒𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖆𝖓🦇
Region: ID
Monday 01 June 2026 05:00:39 GMT
1243229
63437
741
1885
Music
Download
Comments
Pucyl. :
merendah untuk merakyat
2026-06-01 05:23:46
23414
☆☆☆ :
kasian bgt youtuber ini open donasi yuk guys 😢🥹
2026-06-01 16:07:32
11371
𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑧 :
PC elit kursi sulit 😹😹
2026-06-03 07:30:56
957
Alya[PutrA]🤍 :
akibat efek samping dari streamer menyediakan live nya resolusi 2k sampai-sampai kursi nya 144p
2026-06-01 07:31:04
2024
ilhim_god :
kasihan YouTubeer perintis
2026-06-01 15:33:58
995
🌊TSUNAMI RENZ❗ :
salfok ama kursinya❌ salfok ama game nya✅🗿
2026-06-29 11:50:29
351
𝒏𝒂𝒛` :
udah masuk belum win? 😢
2026-07-12 12:01:36
183
|| nihbillimprove || :
mau kasihan tapi gw lebih kasihan😭
2026-06-12 05:35:02
154
feby🐟 :
nemenin windah dari kursi gaming sampe ke kursi kondangan
2026-07-03 14:31:37
46
Teteh geming 🤭 :
kursinya 🥺 Ruangannya 🗿🗿
2026-06-02 01:06:19
42
Qwyt. :
Jokes Streamer kaya
2026-06-06 11:21:01
6
sayang? 🥰 :
kursi Kondangan😭😭
2026-06-01 05:04:03
60
jutssCyəə🎲 :
maaf dikit
2026-06-09 11:28:53
6
vincelale😹 :
nantu bisulan loh bg
2026-07-09 06:57:33
9
kyky_10 :
jangan pake bantal bang entar bisulan
2026-06-06 11:04:18
10
rіz ძ ⍴gіᥣ kᥡ. :
nih buat beli kursi geming
2026-07-03 01:23:33
6
Star★ :
perasaan di live ga gitu🗿
2026-06-06 13:42:57
8
Hii,ini h1lmi :
gila game ya banyakkk bngt
2026-06-01 07:49:00
17
aweth :
req tambah satu kursi lagi
2026-06-02 17:43:26
13
:
banyak bet game nya jir
2026-06-01 07:07:00
41
aLiy :
gua kasih fakta...Windah gk pernah main tiktok.
2026-07-03 16:02:03
15
★1liy_luvv🕸️ :
mau kasian tapi lebih kasian gue 🥺😌
2026-07-03 01:24:22
5
ᴍ. :
emg kalian ga liat setiap stream dia duduk pke apa? pdhl kliatan bgt loh 😭😭
2026-07-04 22:27:50
7
Dit? :
asli nya mah bisa beli kursi gaming 20jt🤣
2026-06-02 08:27:57
12
To see more videos from user @bngrell, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![My brother gives out 4 candies right? // Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. . . . . #aracruz #truecrimecomunnity #rampage #tccc #🍵🌊🌊](/video/cover/7669194838788672781.webp)
