@drshadizari: علاجات تساقط الشعر: كل واحد يشتغل بطريقة مختلفة. خليني اشرحها لك في دقيقة

Drshadizari
Drshadizari
Open In TikTok:
Region: SA
Tuesday 02 June 2026 11:18:20 GMT
195705
4120
88
644

Music

Download

Comments

ik_mr
『𝑲𝑹𝑶𝑴』 :
خساير عالفاضي ازرع افضل اذا تبي شعر والشعر الي موجود حافظ عليه بأنك تبعد عن الشامبو واستخدم كل 5 شهور بلازما جلسه ب 200 طبعا البلازما للحفاظ على الشعر الي ما طاح واذا ما حافظت عليه يطيح بس المزروع ان شاءالله ما راح يطيح
2026-06-04 22:58:03
4
qahtan10
Qahtan :
دوتاسترايد
2026-06-04 15:17:30
0
cc1ee8
cc1ee8 :
يعني مينوكسديل و فيناسترايد مع بعض احسن شي
2026-06-05 20:37:19
2
user37191923626863
اسم مستعار :
الزراعة الحل فقط
2026-06-10 01:09:29
0
ahme.d_cr7
احمد حيدر :
صحيح المينوكسديل اذا اتركه يزيد التساقط
2026-06-08 08:58:13
0
geeth0101
غيث🇸🇦 :
المينوكسيديل البخاخ اغلبه مغشوش وخساير علىً قله سنع الحبوب افضل
2026-06-11 02:51:43
1
amar.h07
amar :
هل مينوكسيدل يتوقف نتيجته مجرد توقفها
2026-06-03 14:54:08
0
g.91111
g.91111 :
الميزو ثيرابي زين لو لا
2026-06-06 06:32:17
0
samirfaysal
Samir Faysal :
دكتور المينوكسديل اذا وكفته الشعر يوكع اكثر من قبل الأستخدام ؟
2026-06-10 22:47:50
1
saudis2030
Clever man :
وش نستخدم ؟ هل نستخدمهم كلهم
2026-06-02 17:56:06
0
user12755478897545679
user39292947472282 :
وفر وقتك وازرع شعر
2026-06-03 18:34:50
0
lr1xx
- m :
ابغى حبوب منوكسديل مانفع معي البخاخ
2026-06-08 02:55:03
0
rrtech143
🐣🐣🐣 :
جديد جداً انصح به 👍
2026-06-06 23:15:13
0
ajml.one
.. :
بلاطه .. ازرع .. شعر خفيف او مقبل ع تساقط .. مينوكسيديل + مثبط dht ( انتهينا ، غير كذا كلام طويل ومضيعة وقت )
2026-06-07 01:27:37
2
sisterofthemartyrsofsir0
*مُنَى*🦋 :
هذا دكتور مفيد
2026-06-05 16:13:55
2
aangel_975
ْS.F :
اجمعوهم كلهم .شات جي بي تي . يعطيكم تسلسل الافضل وشرح وااااي. Ai بعد قريب نستغني عن الاسأله والاحوبه اللي تيجي بالقطاره من الدكاتره. 🌹
2026-06-04 19:11:05
1
i.sam.2
⚛️ سام ابن نوح 🌝 :
كل هذا عشان حضرة البصيلة 😑
2026-06-04 02:28:03
1
user3246049071147
The king :
ايهم افضل دكتور؟
2026-06-02 16:09:42
0
sa5ql
ٰ :
اعشق نطق حرف الراء هذا
2026-06-11 03:05:42
0
rafikrafik4833
rafik rafik :
mostal
2026-06-11 08:46:48
0
babeeii5
B :
منوكسديل لامواض القلب لا
2026-06-10 02:37:06
0
tofy.tofy578
Tofy Tofy :
البلازما ماقتنعت فيها ابد كويس مأسويته ألم ع ألفاظي
2026-06-11 04:11:51
1
zuoz_221
Zu🪽 :
الدرما ستامب؟
2026-06-09 06:01:13
0
zuoz_221
Zu🪽 :
تونر الكافين ؟
2026-06-09 06:00:43
0
abdurasool.mohamm
Abdurasool Mohammed :
رقم واحد فيهم لو سمحت
2026-06-02 18:08:52
0
To see more videos from user @drshadizari, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

In a 1989 interview with Marlon Brando, conducted by Connie Chung, the performance is not in what he says, but in what he refuses to play along with. Brando, already canonized as one of the most influential actors of the 20th century, sits in quiet defiance of the very machinery that helped build his myth. There is no charm offensive, no polished anecdote, no willingness to inhabit the role of cultural idol. Instead, he dismantles the premise of the interview itself, questioning the artificial intimacy, the rehearsed reverence, the unspoken contract that demands he be legible, inspirational, consumable. This resistance feels entirely consistent with the man who brought method acting into the mainstream and then recoiled from the spotlight it created. Brando revolutionized cinema by making emotion internal, messy, and unperformative, most famously in A Streetcar Named Desire and On the Waterfront, yet off-screen he rejected the idea that authenticity could survive fame. In the Chung interview, he turns that skepticism outward. He refuses to be positioned as a moral authority or cultural oracle, gently but firmly critiquing the notion that actors should be elevated to anything beyond what they are: interpreters, not prophets. The moment lands with particular force because it exposes the tension at the heart of celebrity culture. Brando isn’t being difficult for effect; he’s being intellectually honest. He understands that interviews often masquerade as truth while operating as theater, and he declines to confuse the two. Watching it now, the exchange feels startlingly contemporary, a refusal of branding before branding had a name. Brando appears less interested in being understood than in remaining unowned, reminding us that his greatest act may not have been on film, but in his persistent rejection of the roles the world kept trying to assign him.
In a 1989 interview with Marlon Brando, conducted by Connie Chung, the performance is not in what he says, but in what he refuses to play along with. Brando, already canonized as one of the most influential actors of the 20th century, sits in quiet defiance of the very machinery that helped build his myth. There is no charm offensive, no polished anecdote, no willingness to inhabit the role of cultural idol. Instead, he dismantles the premise of the interview itself, questioning the artificial intimacy, the rehearsed reverence, the unspoken contract that demands he be legible, inspirational, consumable. This resistance feels entirely consistent with the man who brought method acting into the mainstream and then recoiled from the spotlight it created. Brando revolutionized cinema by making emotion internal, messy, and unperformative, most famously in A Streetcar Named Desire and On the Waterfront, yet off-screen he rejected the idea that authenticity could survive fame. In the Chung interview, he turns that skepticism outward. He refuses to be positioned as a moral authority or cultural oracle, gently but firmly critiquing the notion that actors should be elevated to anything beyond what they are: interpreters, not prophets. The moment lands with particular force because it exposes the tension at the heart of celebrity culture. Brando isn’t being difficult for effect; he’s being intellectually honest. He understands that interviews often masquerade as truth while operating as theater, and he declines to confuse the two. Watching it now, the exchange feels startlingly contemporary, a refusal of branding before branding had a name. Brando appears less interested in being understood than in remaining unowned, reminding us that his greatest act may not have been on film, but in his persistent rejection of the roles the world kept trying to assign him.

About