@20a570: #تصويري📸 #مصورة_جوال #vairal #الطبيعه #صلاح_الدين

هَويتك.
هَويتك.
Open In TikTok:
Region: IQ
Thursday 04 June 2026 17:12:03 GMT
4060
229
2
11

Music

Download

Comments

userbm71sf7tov
𓆩عـلـي𓆪« 𝕬𝖑𝖎» :
2026-06-06 06:44:14
1
a5mk2
عماد آل علي❤️‍🔥 :
الحبل لا يُشد من طرف واحد ، لأنك مهما كنت مخلصاً ، لن تبقي علاقة حية وحدك، ستنهكك المحاولة، سيستهلكك الانتظار، وستشعر مع الوقت أنك تركض في طريق لا نهاية له، تنادي قلباً لا يسمعك، وترمم شيئًا لا يريد أن يُرمم ستمسك بالحبل بأصابعك المرتجفة، ستنزف وأنت تحاول ألا يسقط، ستعتذر عن أشياء لم تفعلها ، وتبرر كل غيابهم، وتحاول أن تخلق ألف سبب لبرودهم، لصمتهم، لنسيانهم لك. ستقنع نفسك أن الحب ،صبر، أن الحب تضحية وستبقى تشد، وتشد ، وتشد حتى تنقطع داخلك أشياء لا تُرى. ستستيقظ في يوم باكر ، تنظر ليدك الفارغة، وتدرك أنك كنت وحدك منذ البداية، أنك كنت تحارب من أجل من استراح، وتبكي من أجل من ضحك، وتنتظر من رحل، وتحلم بمن نسي. حينها فقط ستفهم أن الحب الذي يترك فيه طرف وحيدًا لا يُسمى حباً ، بل عقوبة مؤجلة وأن القلب الذي أحب أكثر من اللازم، خسر نفسه قبل أن يخسر أحدًا . 🤍
2026-06-04 19:21:03
1
To see more videos from user @20a570, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

You've probably heard of Occam's Razor, which says that if there are two or more explanations for a fact, you should pick the simplest and the most obvious. For example, if you wake up tomorrow morning and find the ground is all wet, it's likely because it rained in the night and not because aliens landed and had a big water fight.  But Occam's Razor has an evil twin known as Occam's Broom, and it goes back to the late Daniel Dennett. Occam's Broom is when somebody sweeps away all of the facts because they are inconvenient, or do not satisfy the arguments they are trying to make.  For example, it might be a journalist who is trying to prove a point, and so only includes those facts and historical data points which support them. Or it might be when a pharmaceutical company promises a new drug and they run ten trials and in four the drug works perfectly. And those four are published, written up, and celebrated. But the six in which the drug did nothing are quietly filed away, and they are never spoken of again.  Occam's Broom is usually a kind of confirmation bias. It is when somebody wants to protect a belief, or to establish a certain narrative, and so they will cherry pick their facts, and they will leave out that which is inconvenient. But it is also more dangerous than an ordinary lie, because you cannot overturn that which you cannot see. If somebody leaves out the relevant data, you cannot hope to falsify it, or to challenge it.  Beware anybody who presents an argument that is faultless and without any critique whatsoever, the chances are they are leaving the things that they don't want you to see.
You've probably heard of Occam's Razor, which says that if there are two or more explanations for a fact, you should pick the simplest and the most obvious. For example, if you wake up tomorrow morning and find the ground is all wet, it's likely because it rained in the night and not because aliens landed and had a big water fight. But Occam's Razor has an evil twin known as Occam's Broom, and it goes back to the late Daniel Dennett. Occam's Broom is when somebody sweeps away all of the facts because they are inconvenient, or do not satisfy the arguments they are trying to make. For example, it might be a journalist who is trying to prove a point, and so only includes those facts and historical data points which support them. Or it might be when a pharmaceutical company promises a new drug and they run ten trials and in four the drug works perfectly. And those four are published, written up, and celebrated. But the six in which the drug did nothing are quietly filed away, and they are never spoken of again. Occam's Broom is usually a kind of confirmation bias. It is when somebody wants to protect a belief, or to establish a certain narrative, and so they will cherry pick their facts, and they will leave out that which is inconvenient. But it is also more dangerous than an ordinary lie, because you cannot overturn that which you cannot see. If somebody leaves out the relevant data, you cannot hope to falsify it, or to challenge it. Beware anybody who presents an argument that is faultless and without any critique whatsoever, the chances are they are leaving the things that they don't want you to see.

About